Literature DB >> 19224004

Is the pass/fail system applicable to a medical school in Korea?

Mee Young Kim1.   

Abstract

To determine whether a pass/fail system is more appropriate for medical education instead of a grade-based system, a survey of medical students and faculty members of Hallym University, Korea, was taken. A questionnaire was delivered to 54 junior students and 36 faculty members from a medical school in Korea and analyzed. Of these participants, 37.7% of students and 36.1% of faculty agreed to the pass/fail system, while 28.3% of students and 52.8% of faculty objected to it. The most frequent reason for objection was the potential decrease in learning achievement. A pass/fail system should be considered after persuasion of the students and faculty to think positively of this system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Education Evaluation, Pass/Fail System; Medical Education

Year:  2007        PMID: 19224004      PMCID: PMC2631203          DOI: 10.3352/jeehp.2007.4.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof        ISSN: 1975-5937


  10 in total

1.  What is the "ideal" grading system for the junior surgery clerkship?

Authors:  C Ravelli; P Wolfson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 2.  Grading student clinical practice performance: the Australian perspective.

Authors:  K Andre
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.442

3.  Outcome measurement in postgraduate year one of graduates from a medical school with a pass/fail grading system.

Authors:  K L Vosti; C D Jacobs
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Pass/fail grading: a disadvantage for students applying for residency.

Authors:  J A Dietrick; M T Weaver; H W Merrick
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  A more explicit grading scale decreases grade inflation in a clinical clerkship.

Authors:  Christopher S Weaver; Aloysius J Humbert; Bart R Besinger; James A Graber; Edward J Brizendine
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  Reliability of different grading systems used in evaluating surgical students.

Authors:  R K Reznick; J A Colliver; R G Williams; J R Folse
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Preferences of program directors for evaluation of candidates for postgraduate training.

Authors:  J L Provan; L Cuttress
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  The effect of pass/fail grading and weekly quizzes on first-year students' performances and satisfaction.

Authors:  L S Robins; J C Fantone; M S Oh; G L Alexander; M Shlafer; W K Davis
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  The benefits of pass-fail grading on stress, mood, and group cohesion in medical students.

Authors:  Daniel E Rohe; Patricia A Barrier; Matthew M Clark; David A Cook; Kristin S Vickers; Paul A Decker
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 7.616

10.  An empirical study of the predictive validity of number grades in medical school using 3 decades of longitudinal data: implications for a grading system.

Authors:  Joseph S Gonnella; James B Erdmann; Mohammadreza Hojat
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.251

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.