Literature DB >> 19222236

Statistical design of quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomic experiments.

Ann L Oberg1, Olga Vitek.   

Abstract

We review the fundamental principles of statistical experimental design, and their application to quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomics. We focus on class comparison using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and discuss how randomization, replication and blocking help avoid systematic biases due to the experimental procedure, and help optimize our ability to detect true quantitative changes between groups. We also discuss the issues of pooling multiple biological specimens for a single mass analysis, and calculation of the number of replicates in a future study. When applicable, we emphasize the parallels between designing quantitative proteomic experiments and experiments with gene expression microarrays, and give examples from that area of research. We illustrate the discussion using theoretical considerations, and using real-data examples of profiling of disease.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19222236     DOI: 10.1021/pr8010099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  94 in total

1.  Selected Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry for Absolute Protein Quantification.

Authors:  Nathan P Manes; Jessica M Mann; Aleksandra Nita-Lazar
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Discovery of mouse spleen signaling responses to anthrax using label-free quantitative phosphoproteomics via mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Nathan P Manes; Li Dong; Weidong Zhou; Xiuxia Du; Nikitha Reghu; Arjan C Kool; Dahan Choi; Charles L Bailey; Emanuel F Petricoin; Lance A Liotta; Serguei G Popov
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Relative quantification: characterization of bias, variability and fold changes in mass spectrometry data from iTRAQ-labeled peptides.

Authors:  Douglas W Mahoney; Terry M Therneau; Carrie J Heppelmann; Leeann Higgins; Linda M Benson; Roman M Zenka; Pratik Jagtap; Gary L Nelsestuen; H Robert Bergen; Ann L Oberg
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 4.466

4.  Multi-omics Comparative Analysis Reveals Multiple Layers of Host Signaling Pathway Regulation by the Gut Microbiota.

Authors:  Nathan P Manes; Natalia Shulzhenko; Arthur G Nuccio; Sara Azeem; Andrey Morgun; Aleksandra Nita-Lazar
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 6.496

5.  Axonal transport proteomics reveals mobilization of translation machinery to the lesion site in injured sciatic nerve.

Authors:  Izhak Michaelevski; Katalin F Medzihradszky; Aenoch Lynn; Alma L Burlingame; Mike Fainzilber
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  mProphet: automated data processing and statistical validation for large-scale SRM experiments.

Authors:  Lukas Reiter; Oliver Rinner; Paola Picotti; Ruth Hüttenhain; Martin Beck; Mi-Youn Brusniak; Michael O Hengartner; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2011-03-20       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  A Primer and Guidelines for Shotgun Proteomic Analysis in Non-model Organisms.

Authors:  Angel P Diz; Paula Sánchez-Marín
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

8.  From lost in translation to paradise found: enabling protein biomarker method transfer by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Russell P Grant; Andrew N Hoofnagle
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 9.  Optimizing Mass Spectrometry Analyses: A Tailored Review on the Utility of Design of Experiments.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Hecht; Ann L Oberg; David C Muddiman
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.109

10.  Getting started in computational mass spectrometry-based proteomics.

Authors:  Olga Vitek
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.