Literature DB >> 19222021

Propensity score estimation with missing values using a multiple imputation missingness pattern (MIMP) approach.

Yongming Qu1, Ilya Lipkovich.   

Abstract

Propensity scores have been used widely as a bias reduction method to estimate the treatment effect in nonrandomized studies. Since many covariates are generally included in the model for estimating the propensity scores, the proportion of subjects with at least one missing covariate could be large. While many methods have been proposed for propensity score-based estimation in the presence of missing covariates, little has been published comparing the performance of these methods. In this article we propose a novel method called multiple imputation missingness pattern (MIMP) and compare it with the naive estimator (ignoring propensity score) and three commonly used methods of handling missing covariates in propensity score-based estimation (separate estimation of propensity scores within each pattern of missing data, multiple imputation and discarding missing data) under different mechanisms of missing data and degree of correlation among covariates. Simulation shows that all adjusted estimators are much less biased than the naive estimator. Under certain conditions MIMP provides benefits (smaller bias and mean-squared error) compared with existing alternatives. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19222021     DOI: 10.1002/sim.3549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  21 in total

1.  Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.901

2.  Antihypertensive medications and risk for incident dementia and Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis of individual participant data from prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Jie Ding; Kendra L Davis-Plourde; Sanaz Sedaghat; Phillip J Tully; Wanmei Wang; Caroline Phillips; Matthew P Pase; Jayandra J Himali; B Gwen Windham; Michael Griswold; Rebecca Gottesman; Thomas H Mosley; Lon White; Vilmundur Guðnason; Stéphanie Debette; Alexa S Beiser; Sudha Seshadri; M Arfan Ikram; Osorio Meirelles; Christophe Tzourio; Lenore J Launer
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 44.182

3.  Survival Outcomes of Younger Patients With Mantle Cell Lymphoma Treated in the Rituximab Era.

Authors:  James N Gerson; Elizabeth Handorf; Diego Villa; Alina S Gerrie; Parv Chapani; Shaoying Li; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Michael I Wang; Jonathon B Cohen; Oscar Calzada; Michael C Churnetski; Brian T Hill; Yazeed Sawalha; Francisco J Hernandez-Ilizaliturri; Shalin Kothari; Julie M Vose; Martin A Bast; Timothy S Fenske; Swapna Narayana Rao Gari; Kami J Maddocks; David Bond; Veronika Bachanova; Bhaskar Kolla; Julio Chavez; Bijal Shah; Frederick Lansigan; Timothy F Burns; Alexandra M Donovan; Nina Wagner-Johnston; Marcus Messmer; Amitkumar Mehta; Jennifer K Anderson; Nishitha Reddy; Alexandra E Kovach; Daniel J Landsburg; Martha Glenn; David J Inwards; Reem Karmali; Jason B Kaplan; Paolo F Caimi; Saurabh Rajguru; Andrew Evens; Andreas Klein; Elvira Umyarova; Bhargavi Pulluri; Jennifer E Amengual; Jennifer K Lue; Catherine Diefenbach; Richard I Fisher; Stefan K Barta
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Methods for Handling Missing Secondary Respondent Data.

Authors:  Rebekah Young; David R Johnson
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2013-02

5.  Propensity score techniques and the assessment of measured covariate balance to test causal associations in psychological research.

Authors:  Valerie S Harder; Elizabeth A Stuart; James C Anthony
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2010-09

6.  Considerations for Using Multiple Imputation in Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis - A Tutorial with Applied Example.

Authors:  Andreas Halgreen Eiset; Morten Frydenberg
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 5.814

7.  Methods for constructing and assessing propensity scores.

Authors:  Melissa M Garrido; Amy S Kelley; Julia Paris; Katherine Roza; Diane E Meier; R Sean Morrison; Melissa D Aldridge
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 8.  Propensity score methods to control for confounding in observational cohort studies: a statistical primer and application to endoscopy research.

Authors:  Jeff Y Yang; Michael Webster-Clark; Jennifer L Lund; Robert S Sandler; Evan S Dellon; Til Stürmer
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Investigating the potential causal relationship between parental knowledge and youth risky behavior: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Melissa A Lippold; Donna L Coffman; Mark T Greenberg
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2014-12

10.  Propensity score and proximity matching using random forest.

Authors:  Peng Zhao; Xiaogang Su; Tingting Ge; Juanjuan Fan
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.