PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to apply a bi-factor model for the determination of test dimensionality and a multidimensional CAT using computer simulations of real data for the assessment of a new global physical health measure for children with cerebral palsy (CP). METHODS: Parent respondents of 306 children with cerebral palsy were recruited from four pediatric rehabilitation hospitals and outpatient clinics. We compared confirmatory factor analysis results across four models: (1) one-factor unidimensional; (2) two-factor multidimensional (MIRT); (3) bi-factor MIRT with fixed slopes; and (4) bi-factor MIRT with varied slopes. We tested whether the general and content (fatigue and pain) person score estimates could discriminate across severity and types of CP, and whether score estimates from a simulated CAT were similar to estimates based on the total item bank, and whether they correlated as expected with external measures. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis suggested separate pain and fatigue sub-factors; all 37 items were retained in the analyses. From the bi-factor MIRT model with fixed slopes, the full item bank scores discriminated across levels of severity and types of CP, and compared favorably to external instruments. CAT scores based on 10- and 15-item versions accurately captured the global physical health scores. CONCLUSIONS: The bi-factor MIRT CAT application, especially the 10- and 15-item versions, yielded accurate global physical health scores that discriminated across known severity groups and types of CP, and correlated as expected with concurrent measures. The CATs have potential for collecting complex data on the physical health of children with CP in an efficient manner.
PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to apply a bi-factor model for the determination of test dimensionality and a multidimensional CAT using computer simulations of real data for the assessment of a new global physical health measure for children with cerebral palsy (CP). METHODS: Parent respondents of 306 children with cerebral palsy were recruited from four pediatric rehabilitation hospitals and outpatient clinics. We compared confirmatory factor analysis results across four models: (1) one-factor unidimensional; (2) two-factor multidimensional (MIRT); (3) bi-factor MIRT with fixed slopes; and (4) bi-factor MIRT with varied slopes. We tested whether the general and content (fatigue and pain) person score estimates could discriminate across severity and types of CP, and whether score estimates from a simulated CAT were similar to estimates based on the total item bank, and whether they correlated as expected with external measures. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis suggested separate pain and fatigue sub-factors; all 37 items were retained in the analyses. From the bi-factor MIRT model with fixed slopes, the full item bank scores discriminated across levels of severity and types of CP, and compared favorably to external instruments. CAT scores based on 10- and 15-item versions accurately captured the global physical health scores. CONCLUSIONS: The bi-factor MIRT CAT application, especially the 10- and 15-item versions, yielded accurate global physical health scores that discriminated across known severity groups and types of CP, and correlated as expected with concurrent measures. The CATs have potential for collecting complex data on the physical health of children with CP in an efficient manner.
Authors: Unni G Narayanan; Darcy Fehlings; Shannon Weir; Shannon Knights; Sonia Kiran; Kent Campbell Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 5.449
Authors: Bryce B Reeve; Ron D Hays; Jakob B Bjorner; Karon F Cook; Paul K Crane; Jeanne A Teresi; David Thissen; Dennis A Revicki; David J Weiss; Ronald K Hambleton; Honghu Liu; Richard Gershon; Steven P Reise; Jin-shei Lai; David Cella Journal: Med Care Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: James W Varni; Tasha M Burwinkle; Susan J Berrin; Sandra A Sherman; Kanela Artavia; Vanessa L Malcarne; Henry G Chambers Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 5.449
Authors: Stephen M Haley; Pengsheng Ni; Maria A Fragala-Pinkham; Alison M Skrinar; Deyanira Corzo Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 5.449
Authors: Wendy J Coster; Stephen M Haley; Pengsheng Ni; Helene M Dumas; Maria A Fragala-Pinkham Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Stephen M Haley; Wendy J Coster; Helene M Dumas; Maria A Fragala-Pinkham; Jessica Kramer; Pengsheng Ni; Feng Tian; Ying-Chia Kao; Rich Moed; Larry H Ludlow Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 2011-11-11 Impact factor: 5.449
Authors: Helene M Dumas; Maria A Fragala-Pinkham; Stephen M Haley; Pengsheng Ni; Wendy Coster; Jessica M Kramer; Ying-Chia Kao; Richard Moed; Larry H Ludlow Journal: Disabil Rehabil Date: 2011-10-12 Impact factor: 3.033
Authors: Thubi H A Kolobe; Jennifer Braswell Christy; Mary E Gannotti; Jill C Heathcock; Diane L Damiano; Edward Taub; Michael J Majsak; Andrew M Gordon; Robyn K Fuchs; Margaret E O'Neil; Vincent J Caiozzo Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2014-02-13
Authors: Pierre Michel; Karine Baumstarck; Christophe Lancon; Badih Ghattas; Anderson Loundou; Pascal Auquier; Laurent Boyer Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2017-03-25 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Stephen M Haley; Wendy I Coster; Ying-Chia Kao; Helene M Dumas; Maria A Fragala-Pinkham; Jessica M Kramer; Larry H Ludlow; Richard Moed Journal: Pediatr Phys Ther Date: 2010 Impact factor: 3.049
Authors: Anna L Kratz; Mary D Slavin; M J Mulcahey; Alan M Jette; David S Tulsky; Stephen M Haley Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2013-03-31 Impact factor: 4.147