Literature DB >> 19221865

Effect of adding temozolomide to radiation therapy on the incidence of pseudo-progression.

Elizabeth R Gerstner1, Margaret B McNamara, Andrew D Norden, Debra Lafrankie, Patrick Y Wen.   

Abstract

Recently, there has been greater awareness that combination radiation and temozolomide used to treat glioblastomas may cause increased contrast enhancement on the first post radiation MRI scan. However, this increased enhancement may stabilize or decrease over time and represent pseudo-progression (psPD) rather than true progressive disease. It has never been shown that this phenomenon is greater with combination therapy than radiation alone. To address this question, we reviewed MRI scans in glioblastoma patients treated with radiation alone versus patients treated with radiation and concomitant temozolomide and compared the frequency of psPD in the two groups. Eighteen of 47 patients (38%) treated with radiation alone demonstrated enlargement on their first post-radiation MRI scan and 11 of these 18 (61%) proved to have psPD as defined by no further enlargement on stable therapy for 3 months following radiation. Twenty-four of 45 patients (53%) treated with radiation and temozolomide had enlargement on their first post-radiation MRI scan and 13 of these 24 (54%) had psPD. Median overall survival (OS) in patients with psPD treated with radiation alone was 15.6 versus 12.8 months in those without psPD. Median OS in patients treated with radiation and concomitant temozolomide who had psPD was 24.4 versus 15.9 months in those who did not have psPD. We were unable to detect a difference in OS between the four groups. Presence of psPD, independent of treatment, was associated with prolonged progression-free survival (P = 0.05) but not OS. psPD may be more common in combination therapy but most likely by a small margin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19221865     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-009-9809-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  12 in total

1.  Survival of human glioma cells treated with various combination of temozolomide and X-rays.

Authors:  J van Rijn; J J Heimans; J van den Berg; P van der Valk; B J Slotman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  Immediate post-radiotherapy changes in malignant glioma can mimic tumor progression.

Authors:  M C Y de Wit; H G de Bruin; W Eijkenboom; P A E Sillevis Smitt; M J van den Bent
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2004-08-10       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Early necrosis following concurrent Temodar and radiotherapy in patients with glioblastoma.

Authors:  Marc C Chamberlain; Michael J Glantz; Lisa Chalmers; Alixis Van Horn; Andrew E Sloan
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma.

Authors:  D R Macdonald; T L Cascino; S C Schold; J G Cairncross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Temozolomide-mediated radiation enhancement in glioblastoma: a report on underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  Arnab Chakravarti; Michael G Erkkinen; Ulf Nestler; Roger Stupp; Minesh Mehta; Ken Aldape; Mark R Gilbert; Peter McL Black; Jay S Loeffler
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  In vitro evaluation of temozolomide combined with X-irradiation.

Authors:  S R Wedge; J K Porteous; M G Glaser; K Marcus; E S Newlands
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.248

7.  Radiation response and survival time in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  F G Barker; M D Prados; S M Chang; P H Gutin; K R Lamborn; D A Larson; M K Malec; M W McDermott; P K Sneed; W M Wara; C B Wilson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Malignant gliomas: MR imaging spectrum of radiation therapy- and chemotherapy-induced necrosis of the brain after treatment.

Authors:  A J Kumar; N E Leeds; G N Fuller; P Van Tassel; M H Maor; R E Sawaya; V A Levin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  MGMT promoter methylation status can predict the incidence and outcome of pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Alba A Brandes; Enrico Franceschi; Alicia Tosoni; Valeria Blatt; Annalisa Pession; Giovanni Tallini; Roberta Bertorelle; Stefania Bartolini; Fabio Calbucci; Alvaro Andreoli; Giampiero Frezza; Marco Leonardi; Federica Spagnolli; Mario Ermani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Incidence of early pseudo-progression in a cohort of malignant glioma patients treated with chemoirradiation with temozolomide.

Authors:  Walter Taal; Dieta Brandsma; Hein G de Bruin; Jacoline E Bromberg; Annemarie T Swaak-Kragten; Peter A E Sillevis Smitt; Corine A van Es; Martin J van den Bent
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  54 in total

Review 1.  Intra-arterial brachytherapy of hepatic malignancies: watch the flow.

Authors:  Bruno Morgan; Andrew S Kennedy; Val Lewington; Bleddyn Jones; Ricky A Sharma
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Early post-bevacizumab progression on contrast-enhanced MRI as a prognostic marker for overall survival in recurrent glioblastoma: results from the ACRIN 6677/RTOG 0625 Central Reader Study.

Authors:  Jerrold L Boxerman; Zheng Zhang; Yair Safriel; Mykol Larvie; Bradley S Snyder; Rajan Jain; T Linda Chi; A Gregory Sorensen; Mark R Gilbert; Daniel P Barboriak
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 3.  Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse: imaging challenges in the assessment of posttreatment glioma.

Authors:  L C Hygino da Cruz; I Rodriguez; R C Domingues; E L Gasparetto; A G Sorensen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Impact of imaging measurements on response assessment in glioblastoma clinical trials.

Authors:  David A Reardon; Karla V Ballman; Jan C Buckner; Susan M Chang; Benjamin M Ellingson
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  Diagnosis of pseudoprogression using MRI perfusion in patients with glioblastoma multiforme may predict improved survival.

Authors:  Seymur Gahramanov; Csanad Varallyay; Rose Marie Tyson; Cynthia Lacy; Rongwei Fu; Joao Prola Netto; Morad Nasseri; Tricia White; Randy L Woltjer; Sakir Humayun Gultekin; Edward A Neuwelt
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2014-11

Review 6.  Advanced MRI Techniques in the Monitoring of Treatment of Gliomas.

Authors:  Harpreet Hyare; Steffi Thust; Jeremy Rees
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 7.  Clinical Imaging for Diagnostic Challenges in the Management of Gliomas: A Review.

Authors:  Alipi V Bonm; Reed Ritterbusch; Patrick Throckmorton; Jerome J Graber
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  Evaluation of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma multiforme using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging with ferumoxytol calls RANO criteria into question.

Authors:  Morad Nasseri; Seymur Gahramanov; Joao Prola Netto; Rongwei Fu; Leslie L Muldoon; Csanad Varallyay; Bronwyn E Hamilton; Edward A Neuwelt
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 12.300

9.  Combined iron oxide nanoparticle ferumoxytol and gadolinium contrast enhanced MRI define glioblastoma pseudoprogression.

Authors:  Ramon F Barajas; Bronwyn E Hamilton; Daniel Schwartz; Heather L McConnell; David R Pettersson; Andrea Horvath; Laszlo Szidonya; Csanad G Varallyay; Jenny Firkins; Jerry J Jaboin; Charlotte D Kubicky; Ahmed M Raslan; Aclan Dogan; Justin S Cetas; Jeremy Ciporen; Seunggu J Han; Prakash Ambady; Leslie L Muldoon; Randy Woltjer; William D Rooney; Edward A Neuwelt
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 12.300

10.  Brain irradiation: effects on normal brain parenchyma and radiation injury.

Authors:  Pia C Sundgren; Yue Cao
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.