Literature DB >> 19221716

MRI signal changes in completely healed meniscus confirmed by second-look arthroscopy after meniscal repair with bioabsorbable arrows.

Yu Miao1, Jia-kuo Yu, Zhuo-zhao Zheng, Chang-long Yu, Ying-fang Ao, Xi Gong, Yong-jian Wang, Dong Jiang.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the MRI signal characteristics and MRI diagnostic accuracy in identifying completely healed menisci repaired with bioabsorbable arrows. A total of 34 patients (38 menisci), with a mean age of 26.0 years, underwent arthroscopic meniscal repair with bioabsorbable arrows and concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Of the 34 patients, 27 were male and 7 were female. Of the 38 menisci, 27 were medial and 11 were lateral. Second-look arthroscopy was performed for each patient while taking out the hardware for ACL reconstruction of the tibial side to evaluate the healing status of the repaired menisci. Postoperative MRI was done 2 days before or after second-look arthroscopy. Sagittal T1, T2 and PD images and coronal T2 and PD images were used as the main diagnostic serials. Second-look arthroscopy showed that surfaces of the repaired sites of all 38 menici were almost smooth. In all 38 cases the tail ends of meniscus arrows disappeared and in four patients new overlying injury of compartmental cartilage at the repaired side was detected. MRI results revealed that different serials had different diagnostic accuracy. Sagittal: T1 28.9%, PD 34.2%, T2 60.5%. Coronal: PD 36.8%, T2 65.8%. The double sides Grade 3 signal had a higher proportion in saggital T1 and PD serials, 47.4 and 39.5%, respectively, while lower in sagittal and coronal T2 serials, both 5.3%. MRI diagnostic accuracy was correlated positively with the follow-up time (P < 0.05). MRI has its limitation in evaluating the status of menisci repaired with bioabsorbable arrows, especially for PD and T1 serials. T2 serials have higher diagnostic accuracy than other serials. MRI diagnostic accuracy can be improved by prolonging follow-up time and might be improved by further classifying Grade 3 signal in terms of signal intensity and the shape of the signal margin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19221716     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-009-0728-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  33 in total

1.  Review of the clinical results of arthroscopic meniscal repair.

Authors:  S Venkatachalam; S P Godsiff; M L Harding
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Chondral injury following meniscal repair with a biodegradable implant.

Authors:  K Anderson; R G Marx; J Hannafin; R F Warren
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  All-inside suture technique using two posteromedial portals in a medial meniscus posterior horn tear.

Authors:  Jin Hwan Ahn; Seung-Ho Kim; Jae Chul Yoo; Joon Ho Wang
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 4.  Meniscus structure and function.

Authors:  Edward M Wojtys; Daniel B Chan
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2005

5.  Arthroscopic meniscal repair evaluated by second-look arthroscopy.

Authors:  C D Morgan; E M Wojtys; C D Casscells; S W Casscells
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Failure strength of a new meniscus arrow repair technique: biomechanical comparison with horizontal suture.

Authors:  P Albrecht-Olsen; T Lind; G Kristensen; B Falkenberg
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  MR diagnosis of meniscal tears of the knee: importance of high signal in the meniscus that extends to the surface.

Authors:  A A De Smet; M A Norris; D R Yandow; F A Quintana; B K Graf; J S Keene
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Long-term assessment of arthroscopic meniscus repair: a 13-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Franky Steenbrugge; René Verdonk; Koen Verstraete
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Meniscal healing after meniscal repair: a CT arthrography assessment.

Authors:  Nicolas Pujol; Ludovico Panarella; Tarik Ait Si Selmi; Philippe Neyret; Donald Fithian; Philippe Beaufils
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Diagnostic value of history-taking and physical examination for assessing meniscal tears of the knee in general practice.

Authors:  Harry Pa Wagemakers; Edith M Heintjes; Simone S Boks; Marjolein Y Berger; Jan An Verhaar; Bart W Koes; Sita Ma Bierma-Zeinstra
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.638

View more
  5 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging is not suitable for interpretation of meniscal status ten years after arthroscopic repair.

Authors:  Nicolas Pujol; Nicolas Tardy; Philippe Boisrenoult; Philippe Beaufils
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Indirect Magnetic Resonance Arthrography May Help Avoid Second Look Arthroscopy for Assessment of Healing After Bucket Handle Medial Meniscus Repairs: A Prospective Clinico-Radiological Observational Study.

Authors:  Sachin Tapasvi; Anshu Shekhar; Aparna Chandorkar; Anupama Patil; Shantanu Patil
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 1.251

3.  Fixation of osteochondral fragments in the human knee using Meniscus Arrows.

Authors:  Diederick B Wouters; Johannes G M Burgerhof; Jeff T M de Hosson; Rudolf R M Bos
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Good Clinical Success Rates Are Seen 5 Years After Meniscal Repair in Patients Regularly Undertaking Extreme Flexion.

Authors:  Jalal Odeh; Sultan Al Maskari; Sameer Raniga; Mahmood Al Hinai; Alok Mittal; Ahmed Al Ghaithi
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-11-23

5.  In-Office Needle Arthroscopy Can Evaluate Meniscus Tear Repair Healing as an Alternative to Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Alex C DiBartola; Alan Rogers; Peter Kurzweil; Michael V Knopp; David C Flanigan
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-09-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.