Literature DB >> 19221329

Correlation of health-related quality of life after liver transplant with the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score.

Eric T Castaldo1, Irene D Feurer, Robert T Russell, C Wright Pinson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a correlation exists between the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after liver transplant (LT).
DESIGN: Prospective cohort.
SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Adult LT recipients (N = 209). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative HRQOL over a 1-year period after LT as measured via multiple regression-based path analysis testing the effects of the MELD score, preoperative variables, and postoperative variables on scores on the physical component summary and mental component summary scales of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey and on composite physical and mental HRQOL scores derived from multiple scales.
RESULTS: The MELD score (beta = .16), cholestatic cirrhosis (beta = .12), autoimmune/metabolic disease (beta = .18), neoplasm (beta = .23), time after LT (beta = .16), and the Karnofsky score (beta = .49) had significant effects on the physical component summary scale score. Autoimmune/metabolic disease (beta = .16) and the Karnofsky score (beta = .25) had significant effects on the mental component summary scale score. The MELD score (beta = .15), high school education (beta = .15), college education (beta = .17), autoimmune/metabolic disease (beta = .15), neoplasm (beta = .23), time after LT (beta = .11), and the Karnofsky score (beta = .51) had significant effects on the composite physical HRQOL score. Autoimmune/metabolic disease (beta = .23), neoplasm (beta = .15), and the Karnofsky score (beta = .42) had significant effects on the composite mental HRQOL score.
CONCLUSIONS: An increasing MELD score, when computed without any diagnosis-based exception points, was associated with improved physical HRQOL in the first year after LT. The MELD score did not affect mental HRQOL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19221329     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2008.563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  6 in total

1.  Health-related quality of life and affective status in liver transplant recipients and patients on the waiting list with low MELD scores.

Authors:  Christian Benzing; Nicco Krezdorn; Julia Förster; Andreas Hinz; Felix Krenzien; Georgi Atanasov; Moritz Schmelzle; Hans-Michael Hau; Michael Bartels
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  The current economic burden of cirrhosis.

Authors:  Guy W Neff; Christopher W Duncan; Eugene R Schiff
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2011-10

3.  Factors predicting health-related quality of life in pediatric liver transplant recipients in the functional outcomes group.

Authors:  Estella M Alonso; Karen Martz; Deli Wang; Michael S Yi; Katie Neighbors; James W Varni; John C Bucuvalas
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2013-08-01

4.  Impact of surgery on quality of life in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Mise; Shouichi Satou; Takeaki Ishizawa; Junichi Kaneko; Taku Aoki; Kiyoshi Hasegawa; Yasuhiko Sugawara; Masatoshi Makuuchi; Norihiro Kokudo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Health-State Utilities in Liver Cirrhosis: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Peyman Adibi; Leila Akbari; Leila Sadat Kahangi; Fatemeh Abdi
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2012-03

6.  Mode of allocation and social demographic factors correlate with impaired quality of life after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Nils Heits; Gunnar Meer; Alexander Bernsmeier; Rainer Guenther; Bjoern Malchow; Thomas Kuechler; Thomas Becker; Felix Braun
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.186

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.