Literature DB >> 19221152

A prognostic model based on nodal status and Ki-67 predicts the risk of recurrence and death in breast cancer patients with residual disease after preoperative chemotherapy.

V Guarneri1, F Piacentini, G Ficarra, A Frassoldati, R D'Amico, S Giovannelli, A Maiorana, G Jovic, P Conte.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative chemotherapy (PCT) allows for in vivo testing of treatment effects on tumor and its microenvironment. Aim of this analysis was to evaluate the effect of PCT on tumor biomarker expression and to evaluate the prognostic role of treatment-induced variation of these biomarkers (molecular response).
METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-one stage II-III breast cancer patients were included. The following parameters were evaluated at baseline and on surgical specimens after PCT: estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), Ki-67, p53, human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2), and apoptosis.
RESULTS: A pathological complete response was observed in 8.8% of the patients. PCT induced a significant reduction in the expression of ER, PgR, Ki-67, and apoptosis. As by multivariable model, Ki-67 > or = 15% and nodal positivity after preoperative chemotherapy (PCT) were significant predictors of worse disease-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) 3.79, P < 0.0001 and HR 2.31, P = 0.037, respectively]. Ki-67 > or = 15% after PCT was also a significant predictor of overall survival (HR 3.75, P = 0.013). On the basis of these two parameters, patients were classified into three groups: (i) low risk (negative nodes and Ki-67 <15%), (ii) intermediate risk (nodal positivity or Ki-67 > or = 15%), and (iii) high risk (nodal positivity and Ki-67 > or = 15%). As compared with the low-risk group, the HRs for recurrence were 3.1 and 9.3 for the intermediate- and high-risk group, respectively (P = 0.0001); the HRs for death were 2.4 and 6.5 for the intermediate- and high-risk group, respectively (P = 0.042).
CONCLUSIONS: Ki-67 and nodal status have been used to generate a simple and easily reproducible prognostic model, able to discriminate patients with worse prognosis among the heterogeneous group of women with residual disease after PCT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19221152     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdn761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  32 in total

1.  Molecular profiling of the residual disease of triple-negative breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy identifies actionable therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Justin M Balko; Jennifer M Giltnane; Kai Wang; Luis J Schwarz; Christian D Young; Rebecca S Cook; Phillip Owens; Melinda E Sanders; Maria G Kuba; Violeta Sánchez; Richard Kurupi; Preston D Moore; Joseph A Pinto; Franco D Doimi; Henry Gómez; Dai Horiuchi; Andrei Goga; Brian D Lehmann; Joshua A Bauer; Jennifer A Pietenpol; Jeffrey S Ross; Gary A Palmer; Roman Yelensky; Maureen Cronin; Vincent A Miller; Phillip J Stephens; Carlos L Arteaga
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 2.  Early stage triple negative breast cancer: Management and future directions.

Authors:  Lubna N Chaudhary
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 4.929

3.  Predictive value of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor type 2 in triple-negative breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Nataliya Babyshkina; Marina Zavyalova; Natalia Tarabanovskaya; Tatyana Dronova; Nadejda Krakhmal; Elena Slonimskaya; Julia Kzhyshkowska; Evgeny Choynzonov; Nadejda Cherdyntseva
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.396

4.  High Proliferation Predicts Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Emilio Alba; Ana Lluch; Nuria Ribelles; Antonio Anton-Torres; Pedro Sanchez-Rovira; Joan Albanell; Lourdes Calvo; Jose Antonio Lopez García-Asenjo; Jose Palacios; Jose Ignacio Chacon; Amparo Ruiz; Juan De la Haba-Rodriguez; Miguel A Segui-Palmer; Beatriz Cirauqui; Mireia Margeli; Arrate Plazaola; Agusti Barnadas; Maribel Casas; Rosalia Caballero; Eva Carrasco; Federico Rojo
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-01-19

Review 5.  Breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and residual disease.

Authors:  Mariana Chávez-MacGregor; Ana María González-Angulo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Breast cancer diagnosis using a microfluidic multiplexed immunohistochemistry platform.

Authors:  Minseok S Kim; Taemin Kim; Sun-Young Kong; Soim Kwon; Chae Yun Bae; Jaekyu Choi; Chul Hwan Kim; Eun Sook Lee; Je-Kyun Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Triple-negative breast cancer: challenges and opportunities of a heterogeneous disease.

Authors:  Giampaolo Bianchini; Justin M Balko; Ingrid A Mayer; Melinda E Sanders; Luca Gianni
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Dual specificity phosphatase 4 gene expression in association with triple-negative breast cancer outcome.

Authors:  Michelle L Baglia; Qiuyin Cai; Ying Zheng; Jie Wu; Yinghao Su; Fei Ye; Ping-Ping Bao; Hui Cai; Zhiguo Zhao; Justin Balko; Wei Zheng; Wei Lu; Xiao-Ou Shu
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Prospective Biomarker Analysis of the Randomized CHER-LOB Study Evaluating the Dual Anti-HER2 Treatment With Trastuzumab and Lapatinib Plus Chemotherapy as Neoadjuvant Therapy for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Valentina Guarneri; Maria Vittoria Dieci; Antonio Frassoldati; Antonino Maiorana; Guido Ficarra; Stefania Bettelli; Enrico Tagliafico; Silvio Bicciato; Daniele Giulio Generali; Katia Cagossi; Giancarlo Bisagni; Samanta Sarti; Antonino Musolino; Catherine Ellis; Rocco Crescenzo; PierFranco Conte
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-08-05

Review 10.  New strategies for triple-negative breast cancer--deciphering the heterogeneity.

Authors:  Ingrid A Mayer; Vandana G Abramson; Brian D Lehmann; Jennifer A Pietenpol
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.