Literature DB >> 26786263

High Proliferation Predicts Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer.

Emilio Alba1, Ana Lluch2, Nuria Ribelles3, Antonio Anton-Torres4, Pedro Sanchez-Rovira5, Joan Albanell6, Lourdes Calvo7, Jose Antonio Lopez García-Asenjo8, Jose Palacios9, Jose Ignacio Chacon10, Amparo Ruiz11, Juan De la Haba-Rodriguez12, Miguel A Segui-Palmer13, Beatriz Cirauqui14, Mireia Margeli14, Arrate Plazaola15, Agusti Barnadas16, Maribel Casas17, Rosalia Caballero17, Eva Carrasco17, Federico Rojo18.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the neoadjuvant setting, changes in the proliferation marker Ki67 are associated with primary endocrine treatment efficacy, but its value as a predictor of response to chemotherapy is still controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 262 patients with centralized basal Ki67 immunohistochemical evaluation derived from 4 GEICAM (Spanish Breast Cancer Group) clinical trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. The objective was to identify the optimal threshold for Ki67 using the receiver-operating characteristic curve method to maximize its predictive value for chemotherapy benefit. We also evaluated the predictive role of the defined Ki67 cutoffs for molecular subtypes defined by estrogen receptor (ER) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2).
RESULTS: A basal Ki67 cutpoint of 50% predicted pathological complete response (pCR). Patients with Ki67 >50% achieved a pCR rate of 40% (36 of 91) versus a pCR rate of 19% in patients with Ki67 ≤ 50% (33 of 171) (p = .0004). Ki67 predictive value was especially relevant in ER-HER2- and ER-HER2+ patients (pCR rates of 42% and 64%, respectively, in patients with Ki67 >50% versus 15% and 45%, respectively, in patients with Ki67 ≤ 50%; p = .0337 and .3238, respectively). Both multivariate analyses confirmed the independent predictive value of the Ki67 cutpoint of 50%.
CONCLUSION: Basal Ki67 proliferation index >50% should be considered an independent predictive factor for pCR reached after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, suggesting that cell proliferation is a phenomenon closely related to chemosensitivity. These findings could help to identify a group of patients with a potentially favorable long-term prognosis. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The use of basal Ki67 status as a predictive factor of chemotherapy benefit could facilitate the identification of a patient subpopulation with high probability of achieving pathological complete response when treated with primary chemotherapy, and thus with a potentially favorable long-term prognosis. ©AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Chemosensitivity; Ki67; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Predictive factor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26786263      PMCID: PMC4746087          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  41 in total

1.  Basic principles of ROC analysis.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.446

2.  Short-term changes in Ki-67 during neoadjuvant treatment of primary breast cancer with anastrozole or tamoxifen alone or combined correlate with recurrence-free survival.

Authors:  Mitch Dowsett; Ian E Smith; Steve R Ebbs; J Michael Dixon; Anthony Skene; Clive Griffith; Irene Boeddinghaus; Janine Salter; Simone Detre; Margaret Hills; Susan Ashley; Stephen Francis; Geraldine Walsh
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Concordance among gene-expression-based predictors for breast cancer.

Authors:  Cheng Fan; Daniel S Oh; Lodewyk Wessels; Britta Weigelt; Dimitry S A Nuyten; Andrew B Nobel; Laura J van't Veer; Charles M Perou
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Jared N Schwartz; Karen L Hagerty; D Craig Allred; Richard J Cote; Mitchell Dowsett; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Wedad M Hanna; Amy Langer; Lisa M McShane; Soonmyung Paik; Mark D Pegram; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Anthony Rhodes; Catharine Sturgeon; Sheila E Taube; Raymond Tubbs; Gail H Vance; Marc van de Vijver; Thomas M Wheeler; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Expression of ER, PgR, HER1, HER2, and response: a study of preoperative chemotherapy.

Authors:  M Colleoni; G Viale; D Zahrieh; L Bottiglieri; R D Gelber; P Veronesi; A Balduzzi; R Torrisi; A Luini; M Intra; S Dellapasqua; A Cardillo; R Ghisini; G Peruzzotti; A Goldhirsch
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy: prognostic significance and survival.

Authors:  Keith N Ogston; Iain D Miller; Simon Payne; Andrew W Hutcheon; Tarun K Sarkar; Ian Smith; A Schofield; Steven D Heys
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 7.  American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer.

Authors:  Lyndsay Harris; Herbert Fritsche; Robert Mennel; Larry Norton; Peter Ravdin; Sheila Taube; Mark R Somerfield; Daniel F Hayes; Robert C Bast
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocols B-18 and B-27.

Authors:  Priya Rastogi; Stewart J Anderson; Harry D Bear; Charles E Geyer; Morton S Kahlenberg; André Robidoux; Richard G Margolese; James L Hoehn; Victor G Vogel; Shaker R Dakhil; Deimante Tamkus; Karen M King; Eduardo R Pajon; Mary Johanna Wright; Jean Robert; Soonmyung Paik; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Prognostic significance of a complete pathological response after induction chemotherapy in operable breast cancer.

Authors:  P Chollet; S Amat; H Cure; M de Latour; G Le Bouedec; M-A Mouret-Reynier; J-P Ferriere; J-L Achard; J Dauplat; F Penault-Llorca
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-04-08       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Clinical response after two cycles compared to HER2, Ki-67, p53, and bcl-2 in independently predicting a pathological complete response after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  Gunter von Minckwitz; Hans-Peter Sinn; Günter Raab; Sibylle Loibl; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Holger Eidtmann; Jörn Hilfrich; Elisabeth Merkle; Christian Jackisch; Serban D Costa; Angelika Caputo; Manfred Kaufmann
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  10 in total

1.  The treatment option of progressive disease in breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Yurong Zheng; Xiaowen Ding; Dehong Zou; Fanrong Zhang; Chengdong Qin; Hongjian Yang; Wenju Mo; Yuqin Ding; Yang Yu
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 4.742

2.  Ki67 Changes Identify Worse Outcomes in Residual Breast Cancer Tumors After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Paula Cabrera-Galeana; Wendy Muñoz-Montaño; Fernando Lara-Medina; Alberto Alvarado-Miranda; Victor Pérez-Sánchez; Cynthia Villarreal-Garza; R Marisol Quintero; Fany Porras-Reyes; Enrique Bargallo-Rocha; Ignacio Del Carmen; Alejandro Mohar; Oscar Arrieta
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-02-28

3.  Predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-ratio in neoadjuvant-treated patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Alexandra von Au; Samra Shencoru; Lorenz Uhlmann; Luisa Mayer; Laura Michel; Markus Wallwiener; André Hennigs; Thomas Deutsch; Fabian Riedel; Joerg Heil; Michael Golatta; Andreas Schneeweiss; Florian Schütz; Christoph Domschke
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  A novel age-related gene expression signature associates with proliferation and disease progression in breast cancer.

Authors:  L M Ingebriktsen; K Finne; L A Akslen; E Wik
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 9.075

5.  External verification and improvement of the Neo-Bioscore staging system in a Chinese cohort.

Authors:  Rui Geng; Ningning Min; Yiqiong Zheng; Chenyan Hong; Rilige Wu; Huan Wu; Yufan Wei; Yanjun Zhang; Xiru Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-06

6.  Comparing Biomarkers for Predicting Pathological Responses to Neoadjuvant Therapy in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Fuxing Zhao; Xingfa Huo; Miaozhou Wang; Zhen Liu; Yi Zhao; Dengfeng Ren; Qiqi Xie; Zhilin Liu; Zitao Li; Feng Du; Guoshuang Shen; Jiuda Zhao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  Ki-67 labeling index is a predictive marker for a pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Miaomiao Tao; Shu Chen; Xianquan Zhang; Qi Zhou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Triple negative breast cancer subtypes and pathologic complete response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Angela Santonja; Alfonso Sánchez-Muñoz; Ana Lluch; Maria Rosario Chica-Parrado; Joan Albanell; José Ignacio Chacón; Silvia Antolín; José Manuel Jerez; Juan de la Haba; Vanessa de Luque; Cristina Elisabeth Fernández-De Sousa; Luis Vicioso; Yéssica Plata; César Luis Ramírez-Tortosa; Martina Álvarez; Casilda Llácer; Irene Zarcos-Pedrinaci; Eva Carrasco; Rosalía Caballero; Miguel Martín; Emilio Alba
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-05-29

9.  US-guided Diffuse Optical Tomography: Clinicopathological Features Affect Total Hemoglobin Concentration in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Wenxiang Zhi; Yu Wang; Cai Chang; Fen Wang; Yaling Chen; Na Hu; Xiaoli Zhu; Li Xie
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 4.243

10.  Gene signature-based prediction of triple-negative breast cancer patient response to Neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Yanding Zhao; Evelien Schaafsma; Chao Cheng
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.452

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.