Literature DB >> 19220943

Fast-track management of patients undergoing proximal pancreatic resection.

J J French1, S D Mansfield, K Jaques, B C Jaques, D M Manas, R M Charnley.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To avoid the risk of complications of biliary drainage, a feasibility study was carried out to determine whether it might be possible to fast-track surgical treatment, with resection before biliary drainage, in jaundiced patients with proximal pancreatic/peri-ampullary malignancy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over an 18-month period, based on their presenting bilirubin levels and other logistical factors, all jaundiced patients who might be suitable for fast-track management were identified. Data on complications and hospital stay were compared with those patients in whom a conventional pathway (with biliary drainage) was used during the same time period. Data were also compared with a group of patients from the preceding 6 months.
RESULTS: Nine patients were fast-tracked and 49 patients treated in the conventional pathway. Fast-track patients mean (SD) serum bilirubin level was 265 micromol/l (81.6) at the time of the operation compared to 43 micromol/l (51.3; P > or = 0.0001) in conventional patients. Mean (SD) of time from referral to operation, 14 days (9) versus 59 days (36.9), was significantly shorter in fast-track patients than conventional patients (P < or = 0.0001). Length of hospital stay mean (SD) at 17 (6) days versus 22 days (19.6; P = 0.2114), surgical complications and mortality in fast-track patients were similar to conventional patients. Prior to surgery, the 49 conventional patients underwent a total of 73 biliary drainage procedures resulting in seven major complications. Comparison with the group of patients from the previous 6 months indicated that the conventional group were not disadvantaged.
CONCLUSIONS: Fast-track management by resection without biliary drainage of selected patients with distal biliary strictures is safe and has the potential to reduce the waiting time to surgery, overall numbers of biliary drainage procedures and the complications thereof.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19220943      PMCID: PMC2765002          DOI: 10.1308/003588409X391893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  29 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative biliary drainage before resection in obstructive jaundice.

Authors:  E A Aly; C D Johnson
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.588

2.  Guidelines for the management of patients with pancreatic cancer periampullary and ampullary carcinomas.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Association of preoperative biliary drainage with postoperative outcome following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  S P Povoski; M S Karpeh; K C Conlon; L H Blumgart; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Yield of prospective, noninvasive evaluation of the common bile duct combined with selective ERCP/sphincterotomy in 1390 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients.

Authors:  R Rieger; W Wayand
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Prediction of risk in biliary surgery.

Authors:  S L Blamey; K C Fearon; W H Gilmour; D H Osborne; D C Carter
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  Surgery for pancreatic cancer: recent controversies and current practice.

Authors:  Curtis J Wray; Syed A Ahmad; Jeffrey B Matthews; Andrew M Lowy
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). A study of 10,000 cases.

Authors:  M K Bilbao; C T Dotter; T G Lee; R M Katon
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Do preoperative biliary stents increase postpancreaticoduodenectomy complications?

Authors:  T A Sohn; C J Yeo; J L Cameron; H A Pitt; K D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Carcinoma of the pancreas and periampullary region: palliation versus cure.

Authors:  J H Klinkenbijl; J Jeekel; P I Schmitz; P A Rombout; G A Nix; H A Bruining; M van Blankenstein
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Risk of biliary surgery in patients with hyperbilirubinemia.

Authors:  C A Pellegrini; P Allegra; F S Bongard; L W Way
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Fast-track programmes for hepatopancreatic resections: where do we stand?

Authors:  Lidewij Spelt; Daniel Ansari; Christian Sturesson; Bobby Tingstedt; Roland Andersson
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery with particular emphasis on pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Authors:  M M E Coolsen; R M van Dam; A A van der Wilt; K Slim; K Lassen; C H C Dejong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  A high-volume ERCP service led by surgeons is associated with good outcomes and meets national key performance indicators: results from a British district general hospital.

Authors:  Henry D De'Ath; Sathyan Nagendram; Eleanor Smith; Mohamed Ramadan; Darmarajah Veeramootoo; Sukhpal Singh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.453

4.  Comparative analysis of the revenues of pylorus-preserving pancreatic head resections and laparoscopic cholecystectomies as prototypic surgical procedures in the German health-care system.

Authors:  Tina Stellwag; Christoph W Michalski; Bo Kong; Mert Erkan; Carolin Reiser-Erkan; Carsten Jäger; Christian Meinl; Helmut Friess; Jörg Kleeff
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Preliminary experience of fast-track surgery combined with laparoscopy-assisted radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jin Chen Hu; Li Xin Jiang; Li Cai; Hai Tao Zheng; San Yuan Hu; Hong Bing Chen; Guo Chang Wu; Yi Fei Zhang; Zhong Chuan Lv
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Nonstrict and individual enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in partial hepatectomy.

Authors:  Xingwei Xu; Yingbin Wang; Tao Feng; Xin Zhao; Yannian Liao; Wu Ji; Jieshou Li
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-11-25

7.  Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on Postoperative Recovery for Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Pooled Analysis of Observational Study.

Authors:  Yang Cao; Hui-Yun Gu; Zhen-Dong Huang; Ya-Peng Wu; Qiong Zhang; Jie Luo; Chao Zhang; Yan Fu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 6.244

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.