Literature DB >> 19220846

Finite-element analysis of stress on dental implant prosthesis.

José Henrique Rubo1, Edson Antonio Capello Souza.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding how clinical variables affect stress distribution facilitates optimal prosthesis design and fabrication and may lead to a decrease in mechanical failures as well as improve implant longevity.
PURPOSE: In this study, the many clinical variations present in implant-supported prosthesis were analyzed by 3-D finite element method. MATERIALS AND
METHOD: A geometrical model representing the anterior segment of a human mandible treated with 5 implants supporting a framework was created to perform the tests. The variables introduced in the computer model were cantilever length, elastic modulus of cancellous bone, abutment length, implant length, and framework alloy (AgPd or CoCr). The computer was programmed with physical properties of the materials as derived from the literature, and a 100N vertical load was used to simulate the occlusal force. Images with the fringes of stress were obtained and the maximum stress at each site was plotted in graphs for comparison.
RESULTS: Stresses clustered at the elements closest to the loading point. Stress increase was found to be proportional to the increase in cantilever length and inversely proportional to the increase in the elastic modulus of cancellous bone. Increasing the abutment length resulted in a decrease of stress on implants and framework. Stress decrease could not be demonstrated with implants longer than 13 mm. A stiffer framework may allow better stress distribution.
CONCLUSION: The relative physical properties of the many materials involved in an implant-supported prosthesis system affect the way stresses are distributed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19220846     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00142.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  8 in total

1.  A further finite element stress analysis of angled abutments for an implant placed in the anterior maxilla.

Authors:  Dong Wu; Kebin Tian; Jiang Chen; Hua Jin; Wenxiu Huang; Yuyu Liu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 2.238

2.  Does matching relation exist between the length and the tilting angle of terminal implants in the all-on-four protocol? stress distributions by 3D finite element analysis.

Authors:  Xiaomei Li; Zhizhong Cao; Xiaoqian Qiu; Zhen Tang; Lulu Gong; Dalin Wang
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Effect of veneering material on the deformation suffered by implant-supported fixed prosthesis framework.

Authors:  Antônio Francisco Grando; Carlos Eduardo Edwards Rezende; Edson Antônio Capello Sousa; José Henrique Rubo
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  A New Model to Study Fatigue in Dental Implants Based on Probabilistic Finite Elements and Cumulative Damage Model.

Authors:  María Prados-Privado; José Antonio Bea; Rosa Rojo; Sérgio A Gehrke; José Luis Calvo-Guirado; Juan Carlos Prados-Frutos
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 1.781

5.  Influence of different restorative materials on the stress distribution in dental implants.

Authors:  Carlos-Eduardo Datte; João-Paulo-Mendes Tribst; Amanda-Maria-de Oliveira Dal Piva; Renato-Sussumu Nishioka; Marco-Antonio Bottino; Alexandre-Duarte M Evangelhista; Fabrício M de M Monteiro; Alexandre-Luiz-Souto Borges
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-05-01

6.  Finite element analysis of occlusal splint therapy in patients with bruxism.

Authors:  Seifollah Gholampour; Hanie Gholampour; Hamed Khanmohammadi
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  Effect of cantilever length and alloy framework on the stress distribution in peri-implant area of cantilevered implant-supported fixed partial dentures.

Authors:  Valdey Suedam; Rafael Tobias Moretti Neto; Edson Antonio Capello Sousa; José Henrique Rubo
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.698

8.  Stress distribution of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses reinforced with silica-nylon mesh.

Authors:  Tarcisio-José de A Paes-Junior; João-Paulo-Mendes Tribst; Amanda-Maria-de Oliveira Dal Piva; Marina Amaral; Alexandre-Luiz-Souto Borges; Fernanda-de-Cássia-Papaiz Gonçalves
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-12-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.