Literature DB >> 19220263

Magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Michael H Fuchsjäger1, Amita Shukla-Dave, Hedvig Hricak, Liang Wang, Karim Touijer, John F Donohue, James A Eastham, Michael W Kattan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, when converted into a scoring system, can predict the biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2000 and October 2004, 610 patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer had MRI before RP, with whole-mount step-sectioning of the pathology sample. MRI findings were retrospectively scored on a seven-point scale based on Tumour-Node-Mestastasis staging (1, no tumour seen, to 7, lymph node metastasis). MRI scores were added to published 5- and 10-year clinical preoperative nomograms for predicting recurrence. The predictive accuracy of MRI was quantified as the differences in bootstrap-corrected concordance indices of the models with and without MRI.
RESULTS: As of August 2007, 64 (10.5%) patients had a biochemical recurrence. MRI scores were associated with recurrence (P < 0.001) with hazard ratios of 1.76 and 1.81 in the 5- and 10-year models, respectively. Actual recurrence rates by MRI score were: 1, 0%; 2, 4.5%; 3, 9%; 4, 24.1%; 5, 33.3%; 6, 69.2%; 7, 100%. When MRI was added, the concordance indices of the 5- and 10-year models increased, from 0.762 to 0.776 (P = 0.081) and 0.773 to 0.788 (P = 0.107), respectively; the improvement was not significant.
CONCLUSION: The MRI scoring system devised was a strong predictor of biochemical recurrence after RP. Although MRI did not provide added prognostic value to standard clinical nomograms, in centres where MRI is used routinely, it might increase the confidence of the clinician in assessing the risk of recurrence by contributing supporting data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19220263     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08406.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  16 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer clinical application.

Authors:  Bing Li; Yong Du; Hanfeng Yang; Yayong Huang; Jun Meng; Dongmei Xiao
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 2.  Risk stratification of prostate cancer: integrating multiparametric MRI, nomograms and biomarkers.

Authors:  Matthew J Watson; Arvin K George; Mahir Maruf; Thomas P Frye; Akhil Muthigi; Michael Kongnyuy; Subin G Valayil; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.404

3.  Pathological and 3 Tesla Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predictors of Biochemical Recurrence after Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Correlation with Whole Mount Histopathology.

Authors:  Nelly Tan; Luyao Shen; Pooria Khoshnoodi; Héctor E Alcalá; Weixia Yu; William Hsu; Robert E Reiter; David Y Lu; Steven S Raman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Value of multiparametric MRI in the work-up of prostate cancer.

Authors:  F Cornud; N B Delongchamps; P Mozer; F Beuvon; A Schull; N Muradyan; M Peyromaure
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Incremental value of magnetic resonance imaging in the advanced management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Liang Wang
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-31

6.  Prostate cancer: prediction of biochemical failure after external-beam radiation therapy--Kattan nomogram and endorectal MR imaging estimation of tumor volume.

Authors:  Antonio C Westphalen; Walter J Koff; Fergus V Coakley; Valdair F Muglia; John M Neuhaus; Ralph T Marcus; John Kurhanewicz; Rebecca Smith-Bindman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  An exploratory study of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy of the prostate as preoperative predictive biomarkers of biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Kristen L Zakian; Hedvig Hricak; Nicole Ishill; Victor E Reuter; Steven Eberhardt; Chaya S Moskowitz; Amita Shukla-Dave; Liang Wang; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Jason A Koutcher
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  T Qayyum; J M Willder; P A McArdle; P G Horgan; J Edwards; M A Underwood
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2013-10-30

9.  Prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with PI-RADS version 2 in prostate cancers: initial results.

Authors:  Sung Yoon Park; Young Taik Oh; Dae Chul Jung; Nam Hoon Cho; Young Deuk Choi; Koon Ho Rha; Sung Joon Hong
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Prostate MRSI predicts outcome in radical prostatectomy patients.

Authors:  Kristen L Zakian; William Hatfield; Omer Aras; Kun Cao; Derya Yakar; Debra A Goldman; Chaya S Moskowitz; Amita Shukla-Dave; Yousef Mazaheri Tehrani; Samson Fine; James Eastham; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 2.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.