BACKGROUND: Nodal staging in patients with rectal cancer predicts prognosis and directs therapy. Published data on the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for diagnosing nodal invasion in patients with rectal cancer has been inconsistent. AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of EUS in diagnosing nodal metastasis of rectal cancers. METHOD: Study Selection Criteria: Only EUS studies confirmed by surgical histology were selected. Data Collection and Extraction: Articles were searched in Medline, Pubmed, and CENTRAL. STATISTICAL METHOD: Pooling was conducted by both fixed-effects model and random-effects model. RESULTS: The initial search identified 3610 reference articles in which 352 relevant articles were selected and reviewed. Data were extracted from 35 studies (N = 2732) that met the inclusion criteria. Pooled sensitivity of EUS in diagnosing nodal involvement by rectal cancers was 73.2% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 70.6-75.6). EUS had a pooled specificity of 75.8% (95% CI 73.5-78.0). The positive likelihood ratio of EUS was 2.84 (95% CI 2.16-3.72), and negative likelihood ratio was 0.42 (95% CI 0.33-0.52). All the pooled estimates, calculated by fixed- and random-effect models, were similar. SROC curves showed an area under the curve of 0.79. The P for chi-squared heterogeneity for all the pooled accuracy estimates was >.10. CONCLUSIONS: EUS is an important and accurate diagnostic tool for evaluating nodal metastasis of rectal cancers. This meta-analysis shows that the sensitivity and specificity of EUS is moderate. Further refinement in EUS technologies and diagnostic criteria are needed to improve the diagnostic accuracy.
BACKGROUND: Nodal staging in patients with rectal cancer predicts prognosis and directs therapy. Published data on the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for diagnosing nodal invasion in patients with rectal cancer has been inconsistent. AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of EUS in diagnosing nodal metastasis of rectal cancers. METHOD: Study Selection Criteria: Only EUS studies confirmed by surgical histology were selected. Data Collection and Extraction: Articles were searched in Medline, Pubmed, and CENTRAL. STATISTICAL METHOD: Pooling was conducted by both fixed-effects model and random-effects model. RESULTS: The initial search identified 3610 reference articles in which 352 relevant articles were selected and reviewed. Data were extracted from 35 studies (N = 2732) that met the inclusion criteria. Pooled sensitivity of EUS in diagnosing nodal involvement by rectal cancers was 73.2% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 70.6-75.6). EUS had a pooled specificity of 75.8% (95% CI 73.5-78.0). The positive likelihood ratio of EUS was 2.84 (95% CI 2.16-3.72), and negative likelihood ratio was 0.42 (95% CI 0.33-0.52). All the pooled estimates, calculated by fixed- and random-effect models, were similar. SROC curves showed an area under the curve of 0.79. The P for chi-squared heterogeneity for all the pooled accuracy estimates was >.10. CONCLUSIONS: EUS is an important and accurate diagnostic tool for evaluating nodal metastasis of rectal cancers. This meta-analysis shows that the sensitivity and specificity of EUS is moderate. Further refinement in EUS technologies and diagnostic criteria are needed to improve the diagnostic accuracy.
Authors: Audrey H Choi; Rebecca A Nelson; Hans F Schoellhammer; Won Cho; Michelle Ko; Amanda Arrington; Christopher R Oxner; Marwan Fakih; Jimmie Wong; Stephen M Sentovich; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Joseph Kim Journal: World J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2015-07-27
Authors: Pietro Marone; Mario de Bellis; Valentina D'Angelo; Paolo Delrio; Valentina Passananti; Elena Di Girolamo; Giovanni Battista Rossi; Daniela Rega; Maura Claire Tracey; Alfonso Mario Tempesta Journal: World J Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2015-06-25
Authors: Rory F Kokelaar; Huw G Jones; Jeremy Williamson; Namor Williams; A Paul Griffiths; John Beynon; Gareth J Jenkins; Dean A Harris Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: M L Malmstrøm; I Gögenur; L B Riis; H Hassan; T W Klausen; T Perner; A Săftoiu; P Vilmann Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2017-04-21 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Gianni Mezzi; Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono; Silvia Carrara; Francesco Perri; Maria Chiara Petrone; Francesco De Cobelli; Simone Gusmini; Carlo Staudacher; Alessandro Del Maschio; Pier Alberto Testoni Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-11-28 Impact factor: 5.742