Literature DB >> 19218733

On the sensitivity of IMRT dose optimization to the mathematical form of a biological imaging-based prescription function.

Stephen R Bowen1, Ryan T Flynn, Søren M Bentzen, Robert Jeraj.   

Abstract

Voxel-based prescriptions of deliberately non-uniform dose distributions based on molecular imaging, so-called dose painting or theragnostic radiation therapy, require specification of a transformation that maps the image data intensities to prescribed doses. However, the functional form of this transformation is currently unknown. An investigation into the sensitivity of optimized dose distributions resulting from several possible prescription functions was conducted. Transformations between the radiotracer activity concentrations from Cu-ATSM PET images, as a surrogate of tumour hypoxia, and dose prescriptions were implemented to yield weighted distributions of prescribed dose boosts in high uptake regions. Dose escalation was constrained to reflect clinically realistic whole tumour doses and constant normal tissue doses. Optimized heterogeneous dose distributions were found by minimizing a voxel-by-voxel quadratic objective function in which all tumour voxels were given equal weight. Prescriptions based on a polynomial mapping function were found to be least constraining on their optimized plans, while prescriptions based on a sigmoid mapping function were the most demanding to deliver. A prescription formalism that fixed integral dose was less sensitive to errors in the choice of the mapping function than one that boosted integral dose. Integral doses to normal tissue and critical structures were insensitive to the shape of the prescription function. Planned target dose conformity improved with smaller beamlet dimensions until the inherent spatial resolution of the functional image was matched. Clinical implementation of dose painting depends on advances in absolute quantification of functional images and improvements in delivery techniques over smaller spatial scales.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19218733      PMCID: PMC2858011          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/6/007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  44 in total

1.  Iterative approaches to dose optimization in tomotherapy.

Authors:  D M Shepard; G H Olivera; P J Reckwerdt; T R Mackie
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Copper-62-ATSM: a new hypoxia imaging agent with high membrane permeability and low redox potential.

Authors:  Y Fujibayashi; H Taniuchi; Y Yonekura; H Ohtani; J Konishi; A Yokoyama
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Photon beam convolution using polyenergetic energy deposition kernels.

Authors:  P W Hoban; D C Murray; W H Round
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  The helical tomotherapy thread effect.

Authors:  M W Kissick; J Fenwick; J A James; R Jeraj; J M Kapatoes; H Keller; T R Mackie; G Olivera; E T Soisson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Optimization of tumour control probability in hypoxic tumours by radiation dose redistribution: a modelling study.

Authors:  Aste Søvik; Eirik Malinen; Øyvind S Bruland; Søren M Bentzen; Dag Rune Olsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Positron emission tomography-guided, focal-dose escalation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Indira Madani; Wim Duthoy; Cristina Derie; Werner De Gersem; Tom Boterberg; Micky Saerens; Filip Jacobs; Vincent Grégoire; Max Lonneux; Luc Vakaet; Barbara Vanderstraeten; Wouter Bauters; Katrien Bonte; Hubert Thierens; Wilfried De Neve
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Pretreatment oxygenation predicts radiation response in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  M Nordsmark; M Overgaard; J Overgaard
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Treatment delivery accuracy in intensity-modulated conformal radiotherapy.

Authors:  D J Convery; M E Rosenbloom
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Tumor uptake of copper-diacetyl-bis(N(4)-methylthiosemicarbazone): effect of changes in tissue oxygenation.

Authors:  J S Lewis; T L Sharp; R Laforest; Y Fujibayashi; M J Welch
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 10.  Biologically optimized radiation therapy.

Authors:  A Brahme; J Nilsson; D Belkic
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.089

View more
  24 in total

1.  A phantom model demonstration of tomotherapy dose painting delivery, including managed respiratory motion without motion management.

Authors:  Michael W Kissick; Xiaohu Mo; Keisha C McCall; Leah K Schubert; David C Westerly; Thomas R Mackie
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  Functional MRI for radiotherapy dose painting.

Authors:  Uulke A van der Heide; Antonetta C Houweling; Greetje Groenendaal; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Differential hepatic avoidance radiation therapy: Proof of concept in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Stephen R Bowen; Jatinder Saini; Tobias R Chapman; Robert S Miyaoka; Paul E Kinahan; George A Sandison; Tony Wong; Hubert J Vesselle; Matthew J Nyflot; Smith Apisarnthanarax
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 4.  Image-guided radiotherapy: from current concept to future perspectives.

Authors:  David A Jaffray
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Molecular imaging of tumor hypoxia with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Olivia J Kelada; David J Carlson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Evaluating Which Dose-Function Metrics Are Most Critical for Functional-Guided Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Austin M Faught; Tokihiro Yamamoto; Richard Castillo; Edward Castillo; Jingjing Zhang; Moyed Miften; Yevgeniy Vinogradskiy
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 7.  Functional and molecular image guidance in radiotherapy treatment planning optimization.

Authors:  Shiva K Das; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 8.  (18)F-FDG PET/CT quantification in head and neck squamous cell cancer: principles, technical issues and clinical applications.

Authors:  Gianpiero Manca; Eleonora Vanzi; Domenico Rubello; Francesco Giammarile; Gaia Grassetto; Ka Kit Wong; Alan C Perkins; Patrick M Colletti; Duccio Volterrani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Spatially resolved regression analysis of pre-treatment FDG, FLT and Cu-ATSM PET from post-treatment FDG PET: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Stephen R Bowen; Richard J Chappell; Søren M Bentzen; Michael A Deveau; Lisa J Forrest; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Dynamic rotating-shield brachytherapy.

Authors:  Yunlong Liu; Ryan T Flynn; Yusung Kim; Wenjun Yang; Xiaodong Wu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.