Literature DB >> 19218330

Removal of red light minimizes methylene blue-stimulated DNA damage in oesophageal cells: implications for chromoendoscopy.

R G Sturmey1, C P Wild, L J Hardie.   

Abstract

Barrett's oesophagus (BO) carries an increased risk of progression to oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Chromoendoscopy with methylene blue (MB) can be used to facilitate identification of BO and target areas for biopsy. If photoexcited, MB can generate reactive oxygen species and genotoxic photodegradation products leading to DNA damage. We have previously demonstrated that levels of DNA damage are increased in BO following MB chromoendoscopy. The aim of this study was to investigate whether DNA damage, as measured by the comet assay, can be minimized during chromoendoscopy by varying MB concentration and light wavelength using an in vitro model. OE33 cells were treated with MB (0.015-15 mM) and exposed to white light (WL). Cells were also illuminated with WL fractions (580-700, 480-580, 350-480, <575, <610 and <688 nm) in the presence of MB. At clinically relevant concentrations, WL illumination of MB (15 mM) caused significant DNA damage in vitro (P < 0.001). Illumination of MB with red light (580-700 nm) also stimulated high levels of DNA damage in OE33 cells (P < 0.001). This effect was not observed with green or blue light. Filtering WL to remove red light wavelengths (>575 nm) reduced DNA damage and apoptosis to control levels in MB-treated cells. In addition, reducing the concentration of MB 10-fold markedly reduced the DNA-damaging effect of MB in vitro. The results show that photoactivation of MB by red light is responsible for the majority of DNA damage. Simple modifications to MB chromoendoscopy, such as filtering out red light from endoscopic WL or reducing MB concentration, are likely to limit DNA damage induced by the procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19218330     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/gep004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  6 in total

1.  Endodontic antimicrobial photodynamic therapy: safety assessment in mammalian cell cultures.

Authors:  Yan Xu; Mark J Young; Ricardo A Battaglino; Leslie R Morse; Carla Raquel Fontana; Tom C Pagonis; Ralph Kent; Nikolaos S Soukos
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 2.  Advanced Imaging for Barrett's Esophagus and Early Neoplasia: Surface and Subsurface Imaging for Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Mansoureh Mkarimi; Hiroshi Mashimo
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2018-10-09

Review 3.  A roadmap for the clinical implementation of optical-imaging biomarkers.

Authors:  Dale J Waterhouse; Catherine R M Fitzpatrick; Brian W Pogue; James P B O'Connor; Sarah E Bohndiek
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 29.234

4.  Transient elevation of glycolysis confers radio-resistance by facilitating DNA repair in cells.

Authors:  Anant Narayan Bhatt; Ankit Chauhan; Suchit Khanna; Yogesh Rai; Saurabh Singh; Ravi Soni; Namita Kalra; Bilikere S Dwarakanath
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 5.  Chemical and biological mechanisms of pathogen reduction technologies.

Authors:  Janna M Mundt; Lindsay Rouse; Jeroen Van den Bossche; Raymond P Goodrich
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.421

6.  Safety and performance analysis of acriflavine and methylene blue for in vivo imaging of precancerous lesions using fibered confocal fluorescence microscopy (FCFM): an experimental study.

Authors:  Bérengère Obstoy; Mathieu Salaun; Liana Veresezan; Richard Sesboüé; Pierre Bohn; François-Xavier Boland; Luc Thiberville
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.317

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.