Literature DB >> 19216589

Caries risk profiles in orthodontic patients at follow-up using Cariogram.

Anas H Al Mulla1, Saad Al Kharsa, Heidrun Kjellberg, Dowen Birkhed.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze caries-related factors shortly after orthodontic treatment and to use the Cariogram computer program to describe caries risk profiles at follow-up in these patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred orthodontic patients age 12-29 years, with a mean age of 17.5 years, were included in the study. They were divided into two groups (50 in each) based on their prebonding decayed, filled surfaces index (DFS). High (5 > or = DFS) and low (2 < or = DFS) groups were created. All patients were examined after debonding in the following order: interview, plaque score, caries examination, saliva samples, bitewing radiographs, panoramic radiographs, and intra-oral digital photos. All types of carious lesions in both the enamel and dentine were diagnosed clinically and radiographically and included in the DFS index. A paraffin-stimulated whole saliva sample was collected for estimations of secretion rate, buffer capacity, and number of mutans streptococci and lactobacilli.
RESULTS: The low caries group (2 < or = DFS) displayed a statistically significant difference and low values for the following factors, DFS (P < .001), lactobacilli (P < .001), mutans streptococci (P < .001), and high Cariogram percent (P < .001). The plaque index displayed very close significance (P = .051).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high (5 > or = DFS) numbers before orthodontic treatment ran a higher risk of developing caries. They had significantly higher numbers of mutans streptococci and lactobacilli and had less chance of avoiding new cavities according to the Cariogram.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19216589     DOI: 10.2319/012708-47.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  15 in total

1.  Caries risk profile using the Cariogram in governmental and private orthodontic patients at de-bonding.

Authors:  Naif Abdullah Almosa; Anas H Al-Mulla; Dowen Birkhed
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 2.  Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances and biofilm formation--a potential public health threat?

Authors:  Yijin Ren; Marije A Jongsma; Li Mei; Henny C van der Mei; Henk J Busscher
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Antibacterial effect and shear bond strength of an orthodontic adhesive cement containing Galla chinensis extract.

Authors:  Lu-Fei Wang; Feng Luo; Chao-Ran Xue; Meng Deng; Chen Chen; Hao Wu
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2016-02-17

4.  Fluoride releasing and enamel demineralization around orthodontic brackets by fluoride-releasing composite containing nanoparticles.

Authors:  Mary A S Melo; Weslanny A Morais; Vanara F Passos; Juliana P M Lima; Lidiany K A Rodrigues
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Caries risk factors in children under treatment with sectional brackets.

Authors:  Sugako Sanpei; Toshiya Endo; Shohachi Shimooka
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Comparative in vitro study of the cleaning efficacy of AirFloss ultra and I-Prox Sulcus brushes in an orthodontic phantom model.

Authors:  Hanna Boes; Sören Brüstle; Gholamreza Danesh; Stefan Zimmer; Mozhgan Bizhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Caries risk profiles in 2- to 6-year-old Greek children using the Cariogram.

Authors:  Katerina Kavvadia; Andreas Agouropoulos; Sotiria Gizani; Lisa Papagiannouli; Svante Twetman
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2012-10

8.  Changes in the oral environment after placement of lingual and labial orthodontic appliances.

Authors:  Luca Lombardo; Yildiz Öztürk Ortan; Özge Gorgun; Chiara Panza; Giuseppe Scuzzo; Giuseppe Siciliani
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 2.750

9.  Are standardized caries risk assessment models effective in assessing actual caries status and future caries increment? A systematic review.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Cagetti; Giuliana Bontà; Fabio Cocco; Peter Lingstrom; Laura Strohmenger; Guglielmo Campus
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  Cariogram caries risk profiles in adolescent orthodontic patients with and without some salivary variables.

Authors:  Georgia Petsi; Sotiria Gizani; Svante Twetman; Katerina Kavvadia
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.