Ozlem Demir1, Adrian E Roitberg. 1. Department of Chemistry and Quantum Theory Project, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-8435, USA.
Abstract
trans-Sialidase is an essential enzyme for Trypanosoma cruzi, the causative agent of Chagas' disease, to escape from the host immune system and to invade the host cells. Therefore, T. cruzi trans-sialidase (TcTS) presents a potential and appealing therapeutic target for this lethal disease. The availability of a structurally very similar enzyme with strict hydrolase activity (Trypanosoma rangeli sialidase, TrSA) provides us a unique opportunity to understand the determinants of their structure and catalytic mechanism. In this study, we compare the catalytic cleft plasticity of free (apo) and ligand-bound (holo) forms of the two enzymes using molecular dynamics simulations. We focus on the mouth of the catalytic cleft that is defined by two residues: W312 and Y119 in TcTS and W312 and S119 in TrSA. Our results indicate that TcTS has a very flexible, widely open catalytic cleft, mostly due to W312 loop motion, in apo form. However, when the catalytic cleft is occupied by a ligand, the flexibility and solvent exposure of TcTS is significantly reduced. On the other hand, TrSA maintains a more open catalytic cleft compared to its crystal structures in both apo and holo forms (and compared to TcTS in holo forms). The reduced solvent exposure of TcTS catalytic cleft might be partially or fully responsible for TcTS to be a less efficient hydrolase than TrSA.
trans-Sialidase is an essential enzyme for n class="Species">Trypanosoma cruzi, the causative agent ofChagas' disease, to escape from the host immune system and to invade the host cells. Therefore, T. cruzi trans-sialidase (TcTS) presents a potential and appealing therapeutic target for this lethal disease. The availability of a structurally very similar enzyme with strict hydrolase activity (Trypanosoma rangeli sialidase, TrSA) provides us a unique opportunity to understand the determinants of their structure and catalytic mechanism. In this study, we compare the catalytic cleft plasticity offree (apo) and ligand-bound (holo) forms of the two enzymes using molecular dynamics simulations. We focus on the mouth of the catalytic cleft that is defined by two residues: W312 and Y119 in TcTS and W312 and S119 in TrSA. Our results indicate that TcTS has a very flexible, widely open catalytic cleft, mostly due to W312 loop motion, in apo form. However, when the catalytic cleft is occupied by a ligand, the flexibility and solvent exposure of TcTS is significantly reduced. On the other hand, TrSA maintains a more open catalytic cleft compared to its crystal structures in both apo and holo forms (and compared to TcTS in holo forms). The reduced solvent exposure ofTcTS catalytic cleft might be partially or fully responsible for TcTS to be a less efficient hydrolase than TrSA.
Authors: Andrew G Watts; Pablo Oppezzo; Stephen G Withers; Pedro M Alzari; Alejandro Buschiazzo Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2005-11-18 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: A Buschiazzo; G A Tavares; O Campetella; S Spinelli; M L Cremona; G París; M F Amaya; A C Frasch; P M Alzari Journal: EMBO J Date: 2000-01-04 Impact factor: 11.598
Authors: F Vandekerckhove; S Schenkman; L Pontes de Carvalho; S Tomlinson; M Kiso; M Yoshida; A Hasegawa; V Nussenzweig Journal: Glycobiology Date: 1992-12 Impact factor: 4.313
Authors: Andrew G Watts; Iben Damager; Maria L Amaya; Alejandro Buschiazzo; Pedro Alzari; Alberto C Frasch; Stephen G Withers Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2003-06-25 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Isadora A Oliveira; Arlan S Gonçalves; Jorge L Neves; Mark von Itzstein; Adriane R Todeschini Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2013-11-05 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Maarten H Wilbrink; Geert A ten Kate; Sander S van Leeuwen; Peter Sanders; Erik Sallomons; Johannes A Hage; Lubbert Dijkhuizen; Johannis P Kamerling Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2014-07-25 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Leonardo Freire-de-Lima; Isadora A Oliveira; Jorge L Neves; Luciana L Penha; Frederico Alisson-Silva; Wagner B Dias; Adriane R Todeschini Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2012-11-29 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Felicity L Mitchell; João Neres; Anitha Ramraj; Rajesh K Raju; Ian H Hillier; Mark A Vincent; Richard A Bryce Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2013-05-14 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Rune T Nordvang; Christian Nyffenegger; Jesper Holck; Carsten Jers; Birgitte Zeuner; Ulrik K Sundekilde; Anne S Meyer; Jørn D Mikkelsen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 3.240