Literature DB >> 19216253

Stool test for colorectal cancer screening--it's time to move!

S M Loitsch1, Y Shastri, J Stein.   

Abstract

Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) is the most widely prescribed screening test for colorectal cancer (CRC) because it is simple, non-invasive, and it has been demonstrated that it reduces the mortality due to colorectal carcinomas (CRC). However, guaiac based fecal blood tests (gFOBT) suffer from poor sensitivity, particularly with respect to detecting early stages, as well as low acceptance among the population. Preliminary data on the detection of fecal proteins like calprotectin and tumour-M2-PK indicated that they might have better performance characteristics than the gFOBTs. However, these tests also suffer from low sensitivity and poor specificity especially for detecting early lesions. Recently developed immunological tests (iFOBT) demonstrate a significantly higher sensitivity and specificity. iFOBTs use antibodies specific to human hemoglobulin and therefore are not affected by the necessity of dietary and drug restrictions that otherwise limit the use of gFOBTs. At present iFOBTs seem to be the most cost-effective approach for non-invasive CRC screening. The analysis of fecal DNA represents an emerging new field for early detection of colorectal neoplasia. Small trials of multitarget assays demonstrated a sensitivity for CRC of 62 to 91% and a sensitivity for adenomas of 26 to 73%. The specificity of these assays is high ranging from 93 to 100%. The major drawback of fecal DNA testing, compared with other fecal colorectal cancer screening tests, is the unacceptable high cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19216253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lab        ISSN: 1433-6510            Impact factor:   1.138


  7 in total

Review 1.  Early detection of colorectal cancer: from conventional methods to novel biomarkers.

Authors:  Nasimeh Vatandoost; Jahanafrooz Ghanbari; Mahboobeh Mojaver; Amir Avan; Majid Ghayour-Mobarhan; Reza Nedaeinia; Rasoul Salehi
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Point-of-care testing in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal cancers: current technology and future directions.

Authors:  Jeremy R Huddy; Melody Z Ni; Sheraz R Markar; George B Hanna
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Faecal pyruvate kinase isoenzyme type M2 for colorectal cancer screening: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carolin Tonus; Markus Sellinger; Konrad Koss; Gero Neupert
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Biomarkers of chemotherapy-induced diarrhoea: a clinical study of intestinal microbiome alterations, inflammation and circulating matrix metalloproteinases.

Authors:  Andrea M Stringer; Noor Al-Dasooqi; Joanne M Bowen; Thean H Tan; Maryam Radzuan; Richard M Logan; Bronwen Mayo; Dorothy M K Keefe; Rachel J Gibson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Management of chronic constipation in general practice.

Authors:  M Bellini; D Gambaccini; S Salvadori; C Tosetti; M T Urbano; F Costa; P Monicelli; M G Mumolo; A Ricchiuti; N De Bortoli; S Marchi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  A coproantigen diagnostic test for Strongyloides infection.

Authors:  Alex M Sykes; James S McCarthy
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2011-02-08

7.  Detection of HIV-1 RNA/DNA and CD4 mRNA in feces and urine from chronic HIV-1 infected subjects with and without anti-retroviral therapy.

Authors:  Ayan K Chakrabarti; Lori Caruso; Ming Ding; Chengli Shen; William Buchanan; Phalguni Gupta; Charles R Rinaldo; Yue Chen
Journal:  AIDS Res Ther       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 2.250

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.