Literature DB >> 1921523

Behavioral interventions to increase adherence in colorectal cancer screening.

R E Myers1, E A Ross, T A Wolf, A Balshem, C Jepson, L Millner.   

Abstract

This investigation was a randomized controlled trial to determine the impact of health education interventions on the return of mailed fecal occult blood (FOB) tests (FOBT adherence) in a colorectal cancer screening program. The study sample included 2,201 men and women aged 50 to 74 years who were members of an Independent Practice Association (IPA)-type health maintenance organization (HMO). Subjects were randomly assigned to a "usual care" Control Group (advance letter, screening kit, reminder letter), and Treatment Groups 1 (usual care + reminder call), 2 (usual care + self-held screening booklet + reminder call), or 3 (usual care + self-held screening booklet + instruction call + reminder call). Bivariate analysis revealed significant differences in adherence (P less than .001) across study groups: Control Group (27%), Group 1 (37%), Group 2 (37%), Group 3 (48%). In addition, a significant positive association between age and adherence (P less than .001) was found. Logistic regression analysis revealed an interaction between sex and treatment. Adherence among men in all treatment groups increased significantly (P less than .0001) in relation to Control Group males. Men in Group 3 also were more likely to adhere than those in Group 2 (P less than .01) or Group 1 (P less than .01). Among women, adherence was significantly higher in Group 3 than in Group 2 (P less than .03), Group 1 (P less than .025), or the Control Group (P = .0008). The primary reason cited for nonadherence was perceived inconvenience of the FOB testing procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1921523     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199110000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  38 in total

1.  Protective effect of faecal occult blood test screening for colorectal cancer: worse prognosis for screening refusers.

Authors:  Y Niv; M Lev-El; G Fraser; G Abuksis; A Tamir
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Distinguishing factors for asymptomatic colonoscopy screening.

Authors:  Corey H Basch; Charles E Basch; Randi L Wolf; Patricia Zybert
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Automated telephone calls improved completion of fecal occult blood testing.

Authors:  David M Mosen; Adrianne C Feldstein; Nancy Perrin; A Gabriela Rosales; David H Smith; Elizabeth G Liles; Jennifer L Schneider; Jennifer E Lafata; Ronald E Myers; Michael Kositch; Thomas Hickey; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Telephone outreach to increase colorectal cancer screening in an urban minority population.

Authors:  Charles E Basch; Randi L Wolf; Corey H Brouse; Celia Shmukler; Alfred Neugut; Lawrence T DeCarlo; Steven Shea
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Estimating development cost for a tailored interactive computer program to enhance colorectal cancer screening compliance.

Authors:  David R Lairson; Yu-Chia Chang; Judith L Bettencourt; Sally W Vernon; Anthony Greisinger
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Knowledge and perceptions of colorectal cancer screening among urban African Americans.

Authors:  K Allen Greiner; Wendi Born; Nicole Nollen; Jasjit S Ahluwalia
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  What makes African American health disparities newsworthy? An experiment among journalists about story framing.

Authors:  Amanda Hinnant; Hyun Jee Oh; Charlene A Caburnay; Matthew W Kreuter
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2011-09-12

8.  Colorectal screening patterns and perceptions of risk among African-American users of a community health center.

Authors:  I M Lipkus; B K Rimer; P R Lyna; A A Pradhan; M Conaway; C T Woods-Powell
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1996-12

9.  Using a multifaceted approach to improve the follow-up of positive fecal occult blood test results.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Himabindu Kadiyala; Gayathri Bhagwath; Anila Shethia; Hashem El-Serag; Annette Walder; Maria E Velez; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Improving fecal occult blood testing compliance using a mailed educational reminder.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Lee; Veronica Reis; Shanglei Liu; Lorraine Conn; Erik J Groessl; Theodore G Ganiats; Samuel B Ho
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.