Literature DB >> 19214092

Disc prolapse: evidence of reversal with repeated extension.

Joan P Scannell1, Stuart M McGill.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A basic science study that used a porcine cervical spine model to produce disc prolapse subsequently exposed to an extension protocol.
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated whether extension or combined extension and side flexion could move the displaced portion of nucleus from the anulus towards the nucleus. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous research has established that repeated flexion can create disc prolapse, the question here is whether repeated extension can reverse the process.
METHODS: The C3/4 segments of 18 porcine cervical spines were dissected and potted in cups. Specimens were preloaded, then axially compressed (1472 N), and repeatedly rotated in either pure flexion or combined flexion and side flexion at a rate of 0.5 degrees /s. Specimens that prolapsed were axially compressed and repeatedly and rotated into extension.
RESULTS: Based on a blinded radiologist's review of the radiograph images, all 18 specimens contained healthy discs before testing, but after testing 2 of the 18 specimens had endplate fractures, whereas 11 of the 18 specimens had prolapsed. Prolapsed nucleus was reduced in 5 of the 11 prolapsed specimens after the reversal testing, whereas the remaining 6 did not change. Subclassification analysis revealed that the prolapsed discs that centralized had significantly less disc height loss (P < 0.01). Neither the classification of the herniation (circumferential or radial) nor the angle of lordosis of the specimens was linked to the behavior of the specimens.
CONCLUSION: This study showed that with repeated flexion, in porcine cervical spines, disc prolapse was initiated and that the displaced portion of nucleus can be directed back towards the center of the disc in response to particular active and passive movements/positions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19214092     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819712a6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

1.  Safe physiotherapy interventions in large cervical disc herniations.

Authors:  Keramat Ullah Keramat; Aisling Gaughran
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-08-18

2.  Conservative management of a 31 year old male with left sided low back and leg pain: a case report.

Authors:  Emily R Howell
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2012-09

3.  Nucleus pulposus deformation in response to lumbar spine lateral flexion: an in vivo MRI investigation.

Authors:  Peter J Fazey; Hiroshi Takasaki; Kevin P Singer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Lumbar extension traction alleviates symptoms and facilitates healing of disc herniation/sequestration in 6-weeks, following failed treatment from three previous chiropractors: a CBP® case report with an 8 year follow-up.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Deed E Harrison
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-11-24

5.  Does the performance of five back-associated exercises relate to the presence of low back pain? A cross-sectional observational investigation in regional Australian council workers.

Authors:  Charles Philip Gabel; Hamid Reza Mokhtarinia; Jonathan Hoffman; Jason Osborne; E-Liisa Laakso; Markus Melloh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Male spine motion during coitus: implications for the low back pain patient.

Authors:  Natalie Sidorkewicz; Stuart M McGill
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  A Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Changes in Severity of Cervical Spinal Stenosis in Flexion and Extension.

Authors:  Yookyung Lee; Seung Yeun Kim; Keewon Kim
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2018-08-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.