Literature DB >> 11324186

The Edmonton Functional Assessment Tool: further development and validation for use in palliative care.

T Kaasa1, J Wessel.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the validity of the revised version of the Edmonton Functional Assessment Tool (EFAT-2), which was designed to measure physical impairment and functional performance of patients in palliative care. The EFAT-2 was administered to 275 patients on admission to an acute palliative care unit. Principal-components factor analysis was performed on the 10 items of the scale, and Cronbach's alpha was calculated to measure internal consistency. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out to compare the admission EFAT-2 scores of three groups of patients: (a) deceased on the unit, (b) transferred to a continuing care palliative unit, (c) discharged home. Two main factors were revealed: physical and non-physical (cognitive/affective). Pain was identified as an independent item and did not correlate with any other item. Cronbach's alpha was 0.86. The ANOVA was significant (F [2,267] 29.063, p < 0.001). The results suggest that the EFAT-2 measures one construct. They also suggest that the EFAT-2 is able to discriminate between palliative care patients based on discharge location.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11324186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Care        ISSN: 0825-8597            Impact factor:   2.250


  8 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of measures of end-of-life care and its outcomes.

Authors:  Richard A Mularski; Sydney M Dy; Lisa R Shugarman; Anne M Wilkinson; Joanne Lynn; Paul G Shekelle; Sally C Morton; Virginia C Sun; Ronda G Hughes; Lara K Hilton; Margaret Maglione; Shannon L Rhodes; Cony Rolon; Karl A Lorenz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  A framework for assessment in oncology rehabilitation.

Authors:  Laura S Gilchrist; Mary Lou Galantino; Meredith Wampler; Victoria G Marchese; G Stephen Morris; Kirsten K Ness
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2009-01-15

3.  Assessment of physical functioning in recurrent glioma: preliminary comparison of performance status to functional capacity testing.

Authors:  Lee W Jones; Rachel-Rose Cohen; Stephanie K Mabe; Miranda J West; Annick Desjardins; James J Vredenburgh; Allan H Friedman; David A Reardon; Emily Waner; Henry S Friedman
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Distress of inpatients with terminal cancer in Japanese palliative care units: from the viewpoint of spirituality.

Authors:  Masako Kawa; Mami Kayama; Etsuko Maeyama; Noriko Iba; Hisayuki Murata; Yuka Imamura; Tikayo Koyama; Michiyo Mizuno
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Predictors of survival in surgically treated patients of spinal metastasis.

Authors:  Pravin Padalkar; Benjamin Tow
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  The Australia-modified Karnofsky Performance Status (AKPS) scale: a revised scale for contemporary palliative care clinical practice [ISRCTN81117481].

Authors:  Amy P Abernethy; Tania Shelby-James; Belinda S Fazekas; David Woods; David C Currow
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2005-11-12       Impact factor: 3.234

7.  Appraisal of the Karnofsky Performance Status and proposal of a simple algorithmic system for its evaluation.

Authors:  Dominik Péus; Nicolas Newcomb; Silvia Hofer
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Palliative care needs in patients hospitalized with heart failure (PCHF) study: rationale and design.

Authors:  Ross T Campbell; Colette E Jackson; Ann Wright; Roy S Gardner; Ian Ford; Patricia M Davidson; Martin A Denvir; Karen J Hogg; Miriam J Johnson; Mark C Petrie; John J V McMurray
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2015-03-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.