Literature DB >> 19211587

Exercising with reserve: exercise regulation by perceived exertion in relation to duration of exercise and knowledge of endpoint.

J Swart1, R P Lamberts, M I Lambert, E V Lambert, R W Woolrich, S Johnston, T D Noakes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) and performance during repetitive maximal effort 40 km time trials as well as after an intervention that aimed to decrease certainty about the remaining distance of the exercise bout. In addition, we examined the RPE during exercise bouts of markedly different duration.
METHODS: Part 1: 12 well-trained, competitive-level cyclists completed five 40 km time trials. During the final time trial all feedback was withheld until the final kilometre. In addition, to cause confusion about the remaining distance, they were asked to report their RPE at random intervals from 18 km to 38 km. Part 2: 6 well-trained, recreation-level cyclists randomly completed a 5 km, 10 km, 40 km and 100 km time trial.
RESULTS: Part 1: Mean RPE increased during the first four trials and decreased during the final trial. The rate of RPE progression increased in linearity during the first four trials and became more conservative in the final trial. These changes were directly related to performance. Part 2: Mean RPE for longer duration trials (40 km, 100 km) were lower during the first half of trial duration but matched those of shorter trials in the final 20%.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased familiarity of the exercise bout and certainty about its endpoint are associated with a more aggressive RPE strategy that produces a superior exercise performance. Certainty about the endpoint and the duration of exercise affect both the RPE strategy and performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19211587     DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.056036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  27 in total

1.  The effect of self- even- and variable-pacing strategies on the physiological and perceptual response to cycling.

Authors:  Kevin Thomas; Mark R Stone; Kevin G Thompson; Alan St Clair Gibson; Les Ansley
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Physiological and psychological effects of deception on pacing strategy and performance: a review.

Authors:  Hollie S Jones; Emily L Williams; Craig A Bridge; Dave Marchant; Adrian W Midgley; Dominic Micklewright; Lars R Mc Naughton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Influence of exercise variation on the retention of a pacing strategy.

Authors:  Alexis R Mauger; Andrew M Jones; Craig Anthony Williams
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Is it time to retire the A.V. Hill Model?: A rebuttal to the article by Professor Roy Shephard.

Authors:  Timothy D Noakes
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Deception of cycling distance on pacing strategies, perceptual responses, and neural activity.

Authors:  Georgia Wingfield; Frank E Marino; Melissa Skein
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 3.657

Review 6.  Fatigue and pacing in high-intensity intermittent team sport: an update.

Authors:  Mark Waldron; Jamie Highton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 7.  Pacing and decision making in sport and exercise: the roles of perception and action in the regulation of exercise intensity.

Authors:  Benjamin L M Smits; Gert-Jan Pepping; Florentina J Hettinga
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Brain activity during self-paced vs. fixed protocols in graded exercise testing.

Authors:  Rachel M Dykstra; Nicholas J Hanson; Michael G Miller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The Influence of a Pacesetter on Psychological Responses and Pacing Behavior during a 1600 m Run.

Authors:  Christopher L Fullerton; Andrew M Lane; Tracey J Devonport
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

10.  The effect of muscle fatigue on stimulus intensity requirements for central and peripheral fatigue quantification.

Authors:  Daria Neyroud; Alexia Vallotton; Guillaume Y Millet; Bengt Kayser; Nicolas Place
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.