Literature DB >> 29238256

The Influence of a Pacesetter on Psychological Responses and Pacing Behavior during a 1600 m Run.

Christopher L Fullerton1, Andrew M Lane2, Tracey J Devonport2.   

Abstract

This study compared the effects of following a pacer versus following a self-paced plan on psychological responses and pacing behavior in well-trained distance runners. Pacing in the present study was individually tailored where each participant developed a personal strategy to ensure their goal time was achieved. We expected that following a pacer would associate with goal achievement, higher pre-run confidence, positive emotions and lower perceived exertion during performance. In a mixed-design repeated-measures study, nineteen well-trained runners completed two 1600m running time trials. Ten runners had a pacer (paced group) who supported their individual pacing strategy, and nine participants self-paced running alone (control group). Both groups could check pace using their wrist watch. In contrast to our expectation, results indicated that the paced group reported higher pre-run anxiety with no significant differences in finish time, goal confidence, goal difficulty, perceived exertion, and self-rated performance between groups. We suggest that following a pacer is a skill that requires learning. Following a personalised pacer might associate with higher anxiety due to uncertainty in being able to keep up with the pacer and public visibility of dropping behind, something that is not so observable in a self-paced run completed alone. Future research should investigate mechanisms associated with effective pacing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emotion; pacing; perceived exertion; running; self-regulation

Year:  2017        PMID: 29238256      PMCID: PMC5721186     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  25 in total

1.  The relationship between critical velocity, maximal lactate steady-state velocity and lactate turnpoint velocity in runners.

Authors:  C G Smith; A M Jones
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  The effect of a second runner on pacing strategy and RPE during a running time trial.

Authors:  Deryn Bath; Louise A Turner; Andrew N Bosch; Ross Tucker; Estelle V Lambert; Kevin G Thompson; Alan St Clair Gibson
Journal:  Int J Sports Physiol Perform       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 4.010

3.  Pacing in Olympic track races: competitive tactics versus best performance strategy.

Authors:  Christian Thiel; Carl Foster; Winfried Banzer; Jos De Koning
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.337

4.  A possible role for emotion and emotion regulation in physiological responses to false performance feedback in 10 mile laboratory cycling.

Authors:  Christopher J Beedie; Andrew M Lane; Mathew G Wilson
Journal:  Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback       Date:  2012-12

Review 5.  Evidence for complex system integration and dynamic neural regulation of skeletal muscle recruitment during exercise in humans.

Authors:  A St Clair Gibson; T D Noakes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Effects of optimal pacing strategies for 400-, 800-, and 1500-m races on the VO2 response.

Authors:  Christine Hanon; Claire Thomas
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.337

7.  Physiological correlates of emotion-regulation during prolonged cycling performance.

Authors:  Andrew M Lane; Mathew G Wilson; Gregory P Whyte; Robert Shave
Journal:  Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback       Date:  2011-09

8.  A 1% treadmill grade most accurately reflects the energetic cost of outdoor running.

Authors:  A M Jones; J H Doust
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.337

9.  Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion.

Authors:  G A Borg
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  The influence of wind resistance in running and walking and the mechanical efficiency of work against horizontal or vertical forces.

Authors:  L G Pugh
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.