Literature DB >> 19210537

A comparison of covariance structure in wild and laboratory muroid crania.

Heather A Jamniczky1, Benedikt Hallgrímsson.   

Abstract

Mutations have the ability to produce dramatic changes to covariance structure by altering the variance of covariance-generating developmental processes. Several evolutionary mechanisms exist that may be acting interdependently to stabilize covariance structure, despite this developmental potential for variation within species. We explore covariance structure in the crania of laboratory mouse mutants exhibiting mild-to-significant developmental perturbations of the cranium, and contrast it with covariance structure in related wild muroid taxa. Phenotypic covariance structure is conserved among wild muroidea, but highly variable and mutation-dependent within the laboratory group. We show that covariance structures in natural populations of related species occupy a more restricted portion of covariance structure space than do the covariance structures resulting from single mutations of significant effect or the almost nonexistent genetic differences that separate inbred mouse strains. Our results suggest that developmental constraint is not the primary mechanism acting to stabilize covariance structure, and imply a more important role for other mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19210537     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00651.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  18 in total

1.  Developmental plasticity in covariance structure of the skull: effects of prenatal stress.

Authors:  Paula N Gonzalez; Benedikt Hallgrímsson; Evelia E Oyhenart
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  Hybridization in human evolution: Insights from other organisms.

Authors:  Rebecca R Ackermann; Michael L Arnold; Marcella D Baiz; James A Cahill; Liliana Cortés-Ortiz; Ben J Evans; B Rosemary Grant; Peter R Grant; Benedikt Hallgrimsson; Robyn A Humphreys; Clifford J Jolly; Joanna Malukiewicz; Christopher J Percival; Terrence B Ritzman; Christian Roos; Charles C Roseman; Lauren Schroeder; Fred H Smith; Kerryn A Warren; Robert K Wayne; Dietmar Zinner
Journal:  Evol Anthropol       Date:  2019-06-20

3.  Signals from the brain induce variation in avian facial shape.

Authors:  Diane Hu; Nathan M Young; Qiuping Xu; Heather Jamniczky; Rebecca M Green; Washington Mio; Ralph S Marcucio; Benedikt Hallgrimsson
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.780

4.  Deciphering the Palimpsest: Studying the Relationship Between Morphological Integration and Phenotypic Covariation.

Authors:  Benedikt Hallgrímsson; Heather Jamniczky; Nathan M Young; Campbell Rolian; Trish E Parsons; Julia C Boughner; Ralph S Marcucio
Journal:  Evol Biol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.119

Review 5.  Studying morphological integration and modularity at multiple levels: concepts and analysis.

Authors:  Christian Peter Klingenberg
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Effects of environmental perturbations during postnatal development on the phenotypic integration of the skull.

Authors:  Paula Natalia Gonzalez; Evelia Edith Oyhenart; Benedikt Hallgrímsson
Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 2.656

7.  Conserved but flexible modularity in the zebrafish skull: implications for craniofacial evolvability.

Authors:  Kevin J Parsons; Young H Son; Amelie Crespel; Davide Thambithurai; Shaun Killen; Matthew P Harris; R Craig Albertson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Measuring the magnitude of morphological integration: The effect of differences in morphometric representations and the inclusion of size.

Authors:  Fabio A Machado; Alex Hubbe; Diogo Melo; Arthur Porto; Gabriel Marroig
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  The effect of automated landmark identification on morphometric analyses.

Authors:  Christopher J Percival; Jay Devine; Benjamin C Darwin; Wei Liu; Matthijs van Eede; R Mark Henkelman; Benedikt Hallgrimsson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 10.  Morphometrics, 3D Imaging, and Craniofacial Development.

Authors:  Benedikt Hallgrimsson; Christopher J Percival; Rebecca Green; Nathan M Young; Washington Mio; Ralph Marcucio
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.