Literature DB >> 19210154

The Adherence Estimator: a brief, proximal screener for patient propensity to adhere to prescription medications for chronic disease.

Colleen A McHorney1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To conceptualize, develop, and provide preliminary psychometric evidence for the Adherence Estimator--a brief, three-item proximal screener for the likelihood of non-adherence to prescription medications (medication non-fulfillment and non-persistence) for chronic disease. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Qualitative focus groups with 140 healthcare consumers and two internet-based surveys of adults with chronic disease, comprising a total of 1772 respondents, who were self-reported medication adherers, non-persisters, and non-fulfillers. Psychometric tests were performed on over 150 items assessing 14 patient beliefs and skills hypothesized to be related to medication non-adherence along a proximal-distal continuum. Psychometric tests included, but were not limited to, known-groups discriminant validity at the scale and item level. The psychometric analyses sought to identify: (1) the specific multi-item scales that best differentiated self-reported adherers from self-reported non-adherers (non-fulfillers and non-persisters) and, (2) the single best item within each prioritized multi-item scale that best differentiated self-reported adherers from self-reported non-adherers (non-fulfillers and non-persisters).
RESULTS: The two rounds of psychometric testing identified and cross-validated three proximal drivers of self-reported adherence: perceived concerns about medications, perceived need for medications, and perceived affordability of medications. One item from each domain was selected to include in the Adherence Estimator using a synthesis of psychometric results gleaned from classical and modern psychometric test theory. By simple summation of the weights assigned to the category responses of the three items, a total score is obtained that is immediately interpretable and completely transparent. Patients can be placed into one of three segments based on the total score--low, medium, and high risk for non-adherence. Sensitivity was 88%--of the non-adherers, 88% would be accurately classified as medium or high risk by the Adherence Estimator. The three risk groups differed on theoretically-relevant variables external to the Adherence Estimator in ways consistent with the hypothesized proximal-distal continuum of adherence drivers.
CONCLUSIONS: The three-item Adherence Estimator measures three proximal beliefs related to intentional non-adherence (medication non-fulfillment and non-persistence). Preliminary evidence of the validity of the Adherence Evidence supports its intended use to segment patients on their propensity to adhere to a newly-prescribed prescription medication. The Adherence Estimator is readily scored and is easily interpretable. Due to its brevity and transparency, it should prove to be practical for use in everyday clinical practice and in disease management for adherence quality improvement. Study limitations related to sample representation and self reports of chronic disease and adherence behaviors were discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19210154     DOI: 10.1185/03007990802619425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  56 in total

Review 1.  Measuring and improving adherence to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  Suzanne M Cadarette; Andrea M Burden
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  Interventions aimed at improving performance on medication adherence metrics.

Authors:  Brandy McGinnis; Yardlee Kauffman; Kari L Olson; Daniel M Witt; Marsha A Raebel
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2014-02

3.  Theory of planned behavior and adherence in chronic illness: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Antonia Rich; Kim Brandes; Barbara Mullan; Martin S Hagger
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-05-21

Review 4.  Big Data in Science and Healthcare: A Review of Recent Literature and Perspectives. Contribution of the IMIA Social Media Working Group.

Authors:  M M Hansen; T Miron-Shatz; A Y S Lau; C Paton
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2014-08-15

5.  Sexual problems during the first 2 years of adjuvant treatment with aromatase inhibitors.

Authors:  Leslie R Schover; George P Baum; Lisa A Fuson; Abenaa Brewster; Amal Melhem-Bertrandt
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Psychopharmacological Treatment in the RAISE-ETP Study: Outcomes of a Manual and Computer Decision Support System Based Intervention.

Authors:  Delbert G Robinson; Nina R Schooler; Christoph U Correll; Majnu John; Benji T Kurian; Patricia Marcy; Alexander L Miller; Ronny Pipes; Madhukar H Trivedi; John M Kane
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 18.112

7.  Reflections on 500 Call-in Radio Shows.

Authors:  Allison Mari Dering-Anderson
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 8.  Patient-reported outcomes in the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium.

Authors:  Deborah J Bowen; Eileen H Shinn; Sophie Gregrowski; Gretchen Kimmick; Laura S Dominici; Elizabeth S Frank; Karen Lisa Smith; Gabrielle Rocque; Kathryn J Ruddy; Teri Pollastro; Michelle Melisko; Tarah J Ballinger; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Antonio C Wolff
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Discordance Between Drug Adherence as Reported by Patients and Drug Importance as Assessed by Physicians.

Authors:  Stéphanie Sidorkiewicz; Viet-Thi Tran; Cécile Cousyn; Elodie Perrodeau; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.166

10.  Individual patients hold different beliefs to prescription medications to which they persist vs nonpersist and persist vs nonfulfill.

Authors:  Colleen A McHorney; Abhijit S Gadkari
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.