CONTEXT: Compared with glucose-sweetened beverages, consumption of fructose-sweetened beverages with meals elevates postprandial plasma triglycerides and lowers 24-h insulin and leptin profiles in normal-weight women. The effects of fructose, compared with glucose, ingestion on metabolic profiles in obese subjects has not been studied. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare the effects of fructose- and glucose-sweetened beverages consumed with meals on hormones and metabolic substrates in obese subjects. DESIGN AND SETTING: The study had a within-subject design conducted in the clinical and translational research center. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included 17 obese men (n = 9) and women (n = 8), with a body mass index greater than 30 kg/m(2). INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were studied under two conditions involving ingestion of mixed nutrient meals with either glucose-sweetened beverages or fructose-sweetened beverages. The beverages provided 30% of total kilocalories. Blood samples were collected over 24 h. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Area under the curve (24 h AUC) for glucose, lactate, insulin, leptin, ghrelin, uric acid, triglycerides (TGs), and free fatty acids was measured. RESULTS: Compared with glucose-sweetened beverages, fructose consumption was associated with lower AUCs for insulin (1052.6 +/- 135.1 vs. 549.2 +/- 79.7 muU/ml per 23 h, P < 0.001) and leptin (151.9 +/- 22.7 vs. 107.0 +/- 15.0 ng/ml per 24 h, P < 0.03) and increased AUC for TG (242.3 +/- 96.8 vs. 704.3 +/- 124.4 mg/dl per 24 h, P < 0.0001). Insulin-resistant subjects exhibited larger 24-h TG profiles (P < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In obese subjects, consumption of fructose-sweetened beverages with meals was associated with less insulin secretion, blunted diurnal leptin profiles, and increased postprandial TG concentrations compared with glucose consumption. Increases of TGs were augmented in obese subjects with insulin resistance, suggesting that fructose consumption may exacerbate an already adverse metabolic profile present in many obese subjects.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: Compared with glucose-sweetened beverages, consumption of fructose-sweetened beverages with meals elevates postprandial plasma triglycerides and lowers 24-h insulin and leptin profiles in normal-weight women. The effects of fructose, compared with glucose, ingestion on metabolic profiles in obese subjects has not been studied. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare the effects of fructose- and glucose-sweetened beverages consumed with meals on hormones and metabolic substrates in obese subjects. DESIGN AND SETTING: The study had a within-subject design conducted in the clinical and translational research center. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included 17 obesemen (n = 9) and women (n = 8), with a body mass index greater than 30 kg/m(2). INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were studied under two conditions involving ingestion of mixed nutrient meals with either glucose-sweetened beverages or fructose-sweetened beverages. The beverages provided 30% of total kilocalories. Blood samples were collected over 24 h. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Area under the curve (24 h AUC) for glucose, lactate, insulin, leptin, ghrelin, uric acid, triglycerides (TGs), and free fatty acids was measured. RESULTS: Compared with glucose-sweetened beverages, fructose consumption was associated with lower AUCs for insulin (1052.6 +/- 135.1 vs. 549.2 +/- 79.7 muU/ml per 23 h, P < 0.001) and leptin (151.9 +/- 22.7 vs. 107.0 +/- 15.0 ng/ml per 24 h, P < 0.03) and increased AUC for TG (242.3 +/- 96.8 vs. 704.3 +/- 124.4 mg/dl per 24 h, P < 0.0001). Insulin-resistant subjects exhibited larger 24-h TG profiles (P < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In obese subjects, consumption of fructose-sweetened beverages with meals was associated with less insulin secretion, blunted diurnal leptin profiles, and increased postprandial TG concentrations compared with glucose consumption. Increases of TGs were augmented in obese subjects with insulin resistance, suggesting that fructose consumption may exacerbate an already adverse metabolic profile present in many obese subjects.
Authors: Karen L Teff; Sharon S Elliott; Matthias Tschöp; Timothy J Kieffer; Daniel Rader; Mark Heiman; Raymond R Townsend; Nancy L Keim; David D'Alessio; Peter J Havel Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: M J Moreno-Aliaga; M M Swarbrick; S Lorente-Cebrián; K L Stanhope; P J Havel; J A Martínez Journal: J Mol Endocrinol Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 5.098
Authors: Xiang Gao; Lu Qi; Ning Qiao; Hyon K Choi; Gary Curhan; Katherine L Tucker; Alberto Ascherio Journal: Hypertension Date: 2007-06-25 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Norman K Pollock; Vanessa Bundy; William Kanto; Catherine L Davis; Paul J Bernard; Haidong Zhu; Bernard Gutin; Yanbin Dong Journal: J Nutr Date: 2011-12-21 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Kimber L Stanhope; Valentina Medici; Andrew A Bremer; Vivien Lee; Hazel D Lam; Marinelle V Nunez; Guoxia X Chen; Nancy L Keim; Peter J Havel Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2015-04-22 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Guanghong Jia; Javad Habibi; Brian P Bostick; Lixin Ma; Vincent G DeMarco; Annayya R Aroor; Melvin R Hayden; Adam T Whaley-Connell; James R Sowers Journal: Hypertension Date: 2014-12-08 Impact factor: 10.190