Literature DB >> 19208693

Bar workers' health and environmental tobacco smoke exposure (BHETSE): symptomatic improvement in bar staff following smoke-free legislation in Scotland.

J G Ayres1, S Semple, L MacCalman, S Dempsey, S Hilton, J F Hurley, B G Miller, A Naji, M Petticrew.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in the health of bar workers after smoke-free legislation was introduced.
DESIGN: Longitudinal study following bar workers from before legislation introduction, at 2 months after introduction and at 1 year to control for seasonal differences.
SETTING: Bars across a range of socio-economic settings in Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: 371 bar workers recruited from 72 bars. INTERVENTION: Introduction of smoke-free legislation prohibiting smoking in enclosed public places, including bars. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Change in prevalence of self-reported respiratory and sensory symptoms.
RESULTS: Of the 191 (51%) workers seen at 1-year follow-up, the percentage reporting any respiratory symptom fell from 69% to 57% (p = 0.02) and for sensory symptoms from 75% to 64% (p = 0.02) following reductions in exposure, effects being greater at 2 months, probably partly due to seasonal effects. Excluding respondents who reported having a cold at either baseline or 1 year, the reduction in respiratory symptoms was similar although greater for "any" sensory symptom (69% falling to 54%, p = 0.011). For non-smokers (n = 57) the reductions in reported symptoms were significant for phlegm production (32% to 14%, p = 0.011) and red/irritated eyes (44% to 18%, p = 0.001). Wheeze (48% to 31%, p = 0.006) and breathlessness (42% to 29%, p = 0.038) improved significantly in smokers. There was no relationship between change in salivary cotinine levels and change in symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: Bar workers in Scotland reported significantly fewer respiratory and sensory symptoms 1 year after their working environment became smoke free. As these improvements, controlled for seasonal variations, were seen in both non-smokers and smokers, smoke-free working environments may have potentially important benefits even for smokers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19208693     DOI: 10.1136/oem.2008.040311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  14 in total

Review 1.  Smokefree legislation effects on respiratory and sensory disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yolanda Rando-Matos; Mariona Pons-Vigués; María José López; Rodrigo Córdoba; José Luis Ballve-Moreno; Elisa Puigdomènech-Puig; Vega Estíbaliz Benito-López; Olga Lucía Arias-Agudelo; Mercè López-Grau; Anna Guardia-Riera; José Manuel Trujillo; Carlos Martin-Cantera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Are there health benefits associated with comprehensive smoke-free laws.

Authors:  Patrick G Goodman; Sally Haw; Zubair Kabir; Luke Clancy
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 3.380

Review 3.  Protecting the world from secondhand tobacco smoke exposure: where do we stand and where do we go from here?

Authors:  Joaquin Barnoya; Ana Navas-Acien
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 4.  Legislative smoking bans for reducing harms from secondhand smoke exposure, smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption.

Authors:  Kate Frazer; Joanne E Callinan; Jack McHugh; Susan van Baarsel; Anna Clarke; Kirsten Doherty; Cecily Kelleher
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-04

5.  The relationship between workers' self-reported changes in health and their attitudes towards a workplace intervention: lessons from smoke-free legislation across the UK hospitality industry.

Authors:  Laura MacCalman; Sean Semple; Karen S Galea; Martie Van Tongeren; Scott Dempsey; Shona Hilton; Ivan Gee; Jon G Ayres
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Changes in smoking behaviours following a smokefree legislation in parks and on beaches: an observational study.

Authors:  Chizimuzo Okoli; Andrew Johnson; Ann Pederson; Sarah Adkins; Wendy Rice
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Secondhand tobacco smoke in bars and restaurants in Santiago, Chile: evaluation of partial smoking ban legislation in public places.

Authors:  Marcia Erazo; Veronica Iglesias; Andrea Droppelmann; Marisol Acuña; Armando Peruga; Patrick N Breysse; Ana Navas-Acien
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Impact of Scotland's smoke-free legislation on pregnancy complications: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Daniel F Mackay; Scott M Nelson; Sally J Haw; Jill P Pell
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Impact of Scottish smoke-free legislation on smoking quit attempts and prevalence.

Authors:  Daniel F Mackay; Sally Haw; Jill P Pell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Biomass fuel use and indoor air pollution in homes in Malawi.

Authors:  D G Fullerton; S Semple; F Kalambo; A Suseno; R Malamba; G Henderson; J G Ayres; S B Gordon
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 4.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.