OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in the health of bar workers after smoke-free legislation was introduced. DESIGN: Longitudinal study following bar workers from before legislation introduction, at 2 months after introduction and at 1 year to control for seasonal differences. SETTING: Bars across a range of socio-economic settings in Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: 371 bar workers recruited from 72 bars. INTERVENTION: Introduction of smoke-free legislation prohibiting smoking in enclosed public places, including bars. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Change in prevalence of self-reported respiratory and sensory symptoms. RESULTS: Of the 191 (51%) workers seen at 1-year follow-up, the percentage reporting any respiratory symptom fell from 69% to 57% (p = 0.02) and for sensory symptoms from 75% to 64% (p = 0.02) following reductions in exposure, effects being greater at 2 months, probably partly due to seasonal effects. Excluding respondents who reported having a cold at either baseline or 1 year, the reduction in respiratory symptoms was similar although greater for "any" sensory symptom (69% falling to 54%, p = 0.011). For non-smokers (n = 57) the reductions in reported symptoms were significant for phlegm production (32% to 14%, p = 0.011) and red/irritated eyes (44% to 18%, p = 0.001). Wheeze (48% to 31%, p = 0.006) and breathlessness (42% to 29%, p = 0.038) improved significantly in smokers. There was no relationship between change in salivary cotinine levels and change in symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Bar workers in Scotland reported significantly fewer respiratory and sensory symptoms 1 year after their working environment became smoke free. As these improvements, controlled for seasonal variations, were seen in both non-smokers and smokers, smoke-free working environments may have potentially important benefits even for smokers.
OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in the health of bar workers after smoke-free legislation was introduced. DESIGN: Longitudinal study following bar workers from before legislation introduction, at 2 months after introduction and at 1 year to control for seasonal differences. SETTING: Bars across a range of socio-economic settings in Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: 371 bar workers recruited from 72 bars. INTERVENTION: Introduction of smoke-free legislation prohibiting smoking in enclosed public places, including bars. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Change in prevalence of self-reported respiratory and sensory symptoms. RESULTS: Of the 191 (51%) workers seen at 1-year follow-up, the percentage reporting any respiratory symptom fell from 69% to 57% (p = 0.02) and for sensory symptoms from 75% to 64% (p = 0.02) following reductions in exposure, effects being greater at 2 months, probably partly due to seasonal effects. Excluding respondents who reported having a cold at either baseline or 1 year, the reduction in respiratory symptoms was similar although greater for "any" sensory symptom (69% falling to 54%, p = 0.011). For non-smokers (n = 57) the reductions in reported symptoms were significant for phlegm production (32% to 14%, p = 0.011) and red/irritated eyes (44% to 18%, p = 0.001). Wheeze (48% to 31%, p = 0.006) and breathlessness (42% to 29%, p = 0.038) improved significantly in smokers. There was no relationship between change in salivary cotinine levels and change in symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Bar workers in Scotland reported significantly fewer respiratory and sensory symptoms 1 year after their working environment became smoke free. As these improvements, controlled for seasonal variations, were seen in both non-smokers and smokers, smoke-free working environments may have potentially important benefits even for smokers.
Authors: Yolanda Rando-Matos; Mariona Pons-Vigués; María José López; Rodrigo Córdoba; José Luis Ballve-Moreno; Elisa Puigdomènech-Puig; Vega Estíbaliz Benito-López; Olga Lucía Arias-Agudelo; Mercè López-Grau; Anna Guardia-Riera; José Manuel Trujillo; Carlos Martin-Cantera Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-07-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kate Frazer; Joanne E Callinan; Jack McHugh; Susan van Baarsel; Anna Clarke; Kirsten Doherty; Cecily Kelleher Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-02-04
Authors: Laura MacCalman; Sean Semple; Karen S Galea; Martie Van Tongeren; Scott Dempsey; Shona Hilton; Ivan Gee; Jon G Ayres Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-05-02 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Marcia Erazo; Veronica Iglesias; Andrea Droppelmann; Marisol Acuña; Armando Peruga; Patrick N Breysse; Ana Navas-Acien Journal: Tob Control Date: 2010-08-25 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: D G Fullerton; S Semple; F Kalambo; A Suseno; R Malamba; G Henderson; J G Ayres; S B Gordon Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2009-08-10 Impact factor: 4.402