Rachael L Murray1, Linda Bauld, Lucy E Hackshaw, Ann McNeill. 1. Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, UK Centre for Tobacco Control Studies, University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, UK. rachael.murray@nottingham.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Smoking is a main contributor to health inequalities. Identifying strategies to find and support smokers from disadvantaged groups is, therefore, of key importance. METHODS: A systematic review was carried out of studies identifying and supporting smokers from disadvantaged groups for smoking cessation, and providing and improving their access to smoking-cessation services. A wide range of electronic databases were searched and unpublished reports were identified from the national research register and key experts. RESULTS: Over 7500 studies were screened and 48 were included. Some papers were of poor quality, most were observational studies and many did not report findings for disadvantaged smokers. Nevertheless, several methods of recruiting smokers, including proactively targeting patients on General Physician's registers, routine screening or other hospital appointments, were identified. Barriers to service use for disadvantaged groups were identified and providing cessation services in different settings appeared to improve access. We found preliminary evidence of the effectiveness of some interventions in increasing quitting behaviour in disadvantaged groups. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence on effective strategies to increase access to cessation services for disadvantaged smokers. While many studies collected socioeconomic data, very few analysed its contribution to the results. However, some potentially promising interventions were identified which merit further research.
BACKGROUND: Smoking is a main contributor to health inequalities. Identifying strategies to find and support smokers from disadvantaged groups is, therefore, of key importance. METHODS: A systematic review was carried out of studies identifying and supporting smokers from disadvantaged groups for smoking cessation, and providing and improving their access to smoking-cessation services. A wide range of electronic databases were searched and unpublished reports were identified from the national research register and key experts. RESULTS: Over 7500 studies were screened and 48 were included. Some papers were of poor quality, most were observational studies and many did not report findings for disadvantaged smokers. Nevertheless, several methods of recruiting smokers, including proactively targeting patients on General Physician's registers, routine screening or other hospital appointments, were identified. Barriers to service use for disadvantaged groups were identified and providing cessation services in different settings appeared to improve access. We found preliminary evidence of the effectiveness of some interventions in increasing quitting behaviour in disadvantaged groups. CONCLUSIONS: There is limited evidence on effective strategies to increase access to cessation services for disadvantaged smokers. While many studies collected socioeconomic data, very few analysed its contribution to the results. However, some potentially promising interventions were identified which merit further research.
Authors: Billie Bonevski; Christine Paul; Catherine D'Este; Robert Sanson-Fisher; Robert West; Afaf Girgis; Mohammad Siahpush; Robert Carter Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-01-31 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Hua-Hie Yong; Mohammad Siahpush; Ron Borland; Lin Li; Richard J O'Connor; Jilan Yang; Geoffrey T Fong; Jiang Yuan Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2012-11-02 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Elle Anastasiou; Alexis Feinberg; Albert Tovar; Emily Gill; M J Ruzmyn Vilcassim; Katarzyna Wyka; Terry Gordon; Ana M Rule; Sue Kaplan; Brian Elbel; Donna Shelley; Lorna E Thorpe Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 7.963