BACKGROUND: Two-photon excitation (TPE) fluorescence microscopy is a high-resolution laser-scanning imaging technique enabling deep imaging inside biological tissues. TPE microscopy has the triple advantage of offering high spatial resolution (250 nm radially, 800 nm axially), high penetration depth inside skin (200 mm ), and low photodamage effects. Further, cells and extracellular matrix intrinsically contain a variety of fluorescent molecules (NADH, tryptophan, keratins, melanin, elastin, cholecalciferol and others), so that biological tissues can be imaged by TPE microscopy without any exogenous probe. The time-resolved analysis of the fluorescence signal, known as fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM), is an additional non-invasive microscopy technique useful to characterize endogenous fluorescence species and their surrounding medium by measuring the mean lifetime of fluorescent emission. Finally, multispectral (MTPE) tissue imaging can also be used to identify different endogenous fluorescent species by measuring their two photon emission spectra. Those techniques offer functional information about the relative quantities of fluorescent molecules, which are correlated with tissue structure in physiological and pathological states. OBJECTIVE: We have decided to apply these three methods at the same time for cutaneous tumors in order to evaluate their possible future use. METHOD: We have analyzed a melanoma and a basal cell carcinoma, with their surrounding healthy skin, to evaluate any difference in healthy skin and neoplasia. The samples were excised during dermatological surgery, then cut, saving some healthy skin in both, to obtain a regular shape, allowing its positioning either with the skin surface parallel to the optical axis (horizontal optical sectioning), or perpendicular (vertical optical sectioning). CONCLUSION: This first result demonstrates that FLIM is effective in discriminating healthy skin from MM, while MTPE is effective in discriminating healthy skin from BCC.
BACKGROUND: Two-photon excitation (TPE) fluorescence microscopy is a high-resolution laser-scanning imaging technique enabling deep imaging inside biological tissues. TPE microscopy has the triple advantage of offering high spatial resolution (250 nm radially, 800 nm axially), high penetration depth inside skin (200 mm ), and low photodamage effects. Further, cells and extracellular matrix intrinsically contain a variety of fluorescent molecules (NADH, tryptophan, keratins, melanin, elastin, cholecalciferol and others), so that biological tissues can be imaged by TPE microscopy without any exogenous probe. The time-resolved analysis of the fluorescence signal, known as fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM), is an additional non-invasive microscopy technique useful to characterize endogenous fluorescence species and their surrounding medium by measuring the mean lifetime of fluorescent emission. Finally, multispectral (MTPE) tissue imaging can also be used to identify different endogenous fluorescent species by measuring their two photon emission spectra. Those techniques offer functional information about the relative quantities of fluorescent molecules, which are correlated with tissue structure in physiological and pathological states. OBJECTIVE: We have decided to apply these three methods at the same time for cutaneous tumors in order to evaluate their possible future use. METHOD: We have analyzed a melanoma and a basal cell carcinoma, with their surrounding healthy skin, to evaluate any difference in healthy skin and neoplasia. The samples were excised during dermatological surgery, then cut, saving some healthy skin in both, to obtain a regular shape, allowing its positioning either with the skin surface parallel to the optical axis (horizontal optical sectioning), or perpendicular (vertical optical sectioning). CONCLUSION: This first result demonstrates that FLIM is effective in discriminating healthy skin from MM, while MTPE is effective in discriminating healthy skin from BCC.
Authors: Daniel U Campos-Delgado; O Gutierrez Navarro; E R Arce-Santana; Alex J Walsh; Melissa C Skala; Javier A Jo Journal: Opt Express Date: 2015-09-07 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Daniel U Campos-Delgado; Omar Gutierrez-Navarro; Edgar R Arce-Santana; Melissa C Skala; Alex J Walsh; Javier A Jo Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Giju Thomas; Johan van Voskuilen; Hoa Truong; Ji-Ying Song; Hans C Gerritsen; H J C M Sterenborg Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Milind Rajadhyaksha; Ashfaq Marghoob; Anthony Rossi; Allan C Halpern; Kishwer S Nehal Journal: Lasers Surg Med Date: 2016-10-27 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: Nirmal Mazumder; Rodney K Lyn; Ragunath Singaravelu; Andrew Ridsdale; Douglas J Moffatt; Chih-Wei Hu; Han-Ruei Tsai; John McLauchlan; Albert Stolow; Fu-Jen Kao; John Paul Pezacki Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-06-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Stefania Seidenari; Federica Arginelli; Sara Bassoli; Jennifer Cautela; Paul M W French; Mario Guanti; Davide Guardoli; Karsten König; Clifford Talbot; Chris Dunsby Journal: Dermatol Res Pract Date: 2011-11-28
Authors: Rakesh Patalay; Clifford Talbot; Yuriy Alexandrov; Martin O Lenz; Sunil Kumar; Sean Warren; Ian Munro; Mark A A Neil; Karsten König; Paul M W French; Anthony Chu; Gordon W H Stamp; Chris Dunsby Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-09-11 Impact factor: 3.240