Literature DB >> 19207203

Alpha power is influenced by performance errors.

Joshua Carp1, Rebecca J Compton.   

Abstract

Error commission evokes changes in event-related potentials, autonomic nervous system activity, and behavior, presumably reflecting the operation of a cognitive control network. Here we test the hypothesis that errors lead to increased cortical arousal, measurable as changes in electroencephalogram (EEG) alpha band power. Participants performed a Stroop task while EEG was recorded. Following correct responses, alpha power increased and then decreased in a quadratic pattern, implying transient mental disengagement during the intertrial interval. This trend was absent following errors, which elicited significantly less alpha power than correct trials. Moreover, post-error alpha power was a better predictor of individual differences in post-error slowing than the error-related negativity (ERN), whereas the ERN was a better predictor of post-error accuracy than alpha power. These findings imply that changes in cortical arousal play a unique role in modulating post-error behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19207203     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00773.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  44 in total

1.  Outcome expectancy and not accuracy determines posterror slowing: ERP support.

Authors:  Elena Núñez Castellar; Simone Kühn; Wim Fias; Wim Notebaert
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Error-monitoring and post-error compensations: dissociation between perceptual failures and motor errors with and without awareness.

Authors:  Ana Navarro-Cebrian; Robert T Knight; Andrew S Kayser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Distinguishing between types of errors and adjustments.

Authors:  Hans S Schroder; Zachary P Infantolino
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Temporal dynamics of reward processing revealed by magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Nuria Doñamayor; Josep Marco-Pallarés; Marcus Heldmann; M Ariel Schoenfeld; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  When the rules are reversed: action-monitoring consequences of reversing stimulus-response mappings.

Authors:  Hans S Schroder; Tim P Moran; Jason S Moser; Erik M Altmann
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Stress regulation and cognitive control: evidence relating cortisol reactivity and neural responses to errors.

Authors:  Rebecca J Compton; Julia Hofheimer; Rebecca Kazinka
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Oscillatory Dynamics of Feedback Processing in Adolescents with Prenatal Cocaine Exposure.

Authors:  Kristen P Morie; Jia Wu; Nicole Landi; Marc N Potenza; Linda C Mayes; Michael J Crowley
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2019-07-28       Impact factor: 2.253

8.  Frontal Monitoring and Parietal Evidence: Mechanisms of Error Correction.

Authors:  Ana Navarro-Cebrian; Robert T Knight; Andrew S Kayser
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Alpha suppression following performance errors is correlated with depression, affect, and coping behaviors.

Authors:  Julia Hofheimer; Rebecca Kazinka; Amanda Levinson; Amanda Zheutlin; Rebecca J Compton
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2013-06-03

10.  Establishing norms for error-related brain activity during the arrow Flanker task among young adults.

Authors:  Michael J Imburgio; Iulia Banica; Kaylin E Hill; Anna Weinberg; Dan Foti; Annmarie MacNamara
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.