BACKGROUND: Nucleic acid amplification tests are sensitive and specific for identifying Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum smear-positive populations, but they are less sensitive in sputum smear-negative populations. Few studies have assessed their performance among patients infected with HIV, and no studies have assessed their performance with oral wash specimens, which may be easier to obtain than sputum samples. METHODS: We performed a prospective study involving 127 adults from 2 populations who were undergoing evaluation for respiratory complaints at Mulago Hospital in Kampala, Uganda. We obtained and tested sputum samples for Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and we simultaneously obtained oral wash specimens to test for M. tuberculosis DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of a novel locus, the secA1 gene. A positive mycobacterial culture of sputum was used to define cases of tuberculosis; we calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the PCR assay with sputum or oral wash specimens in reference to the standard of sputum culture results. RESULTS: Tuberculosis (75 [59%] of 127 patients) and HIV infection (58 [46%] of 126 patients) were both common in the study population. PCR of sputum samples was highly sensitive (sensitivity, 99%; 95% confidence interval, 93%-100%) and specific (specificity, 88%; 95% confidence interval, 77%-96%) for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and performed well among HIV-infected patients and among patients with negative sputum smear results. PCR of oral wash specimens was less sensitive (sensitivity, 73%; 95% confidence interval, 62%-83%) but also detected a substantial proportion of tuberculosis cases. CONCLUSIONS: PCR targeting the secA1 gene was highly sensitive and specific for identifying M. tuberculosis in sputum samples, independent of smear or HIV infection status. Oral washes showed promise as an easily obtained respiratory specimen for tuberculosis diagnosis. PCR of sputum for detection of the secA1 gene could be a rapid, effective diagnostic tool for tuberculosis referral centers.
BACKGROUND: Nucleic acid amplification tests are sensitive and specific for identifying Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum smear-positive populations, but they are less sensitive in sputum smear-negative populations. Few studies have assessed their performance among patients infected with HIV, and no studies have assessed their performance with oral wash specimens, which may be easier to obtain than sputum samples. METHODS: We performed a prospective study involving 127 adults from 2 populations who were undergoing evaluation for respiratory complaints at Mulago Hospital in Kampala, Uganda. We obtained and tested sputum samples for Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and we simultaneously obtained oral wash specimens to test for M. tuberculosis DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of a novel locus, the secA1 gene. A positive mycobacterial culture of sputum was used to define cases of tuberculosis; we calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the PCR assay with sputum or oral wash specimens in reference to the standard of sputum culture results. RESULTS:Tuberculosis (75 [59%] of 127 patients) and HIV infection (58 [46%] of 126 patients) were both common in the study population. PCR of sputum samples was highly sensitive (sensitivity, 99%; 95% confidence interval, 93%-100%) and specific (specificity, 88%; 95% confidence interval, 77%-96%) for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and performed well among HIV-infectedpatients and among patients with negative sputum smear results. PCR of oral wash specimens was less sensitive (sensitivity, 73%; 95% confidence interval, 62%-83%) but also detected a substantial proportion of tuberculosis cases. CONCLUSIONS: PCR targeting the secA1 gene was highly sensitive and specific for identifying M. tuberculosis in sputum samples, independent of smear or HIV infection status. Oral washes showed promise as an easily obtained respiratory specimen for tuberculosis diagnosis. PCR of sputum for detection of the secA1 gene could be a rapid, effective diagnostic tool for tuberculosis referral centers.
Authors: J G Lijmer; B W Mol; S Heisterkamp; G J Bonsel; M H Prins; J H van der Meulen; P M Bossuyt Journal: JAMA Date: 1999-09-15 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: M R A van Cleeff; L Kivihya-Ndugga; W Githui; L Nganga; J Odhiambo; P R Klatser Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: B Kambashi; G Mbulo; R McNerney; R Tembwe; A Kambashi; V Tihon; P Godfrey-Faussett Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: M van Cleeff; L Kivihya-Ndugga; W Githui; L Ng'ang'a; D Kibuga; J Odhiambo; P Klatser Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Olga L Sarmiento; Kristen A Weigle; Janet Alexander; David J Weber; William C Miller Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Hans Henrik Larsen; Laurence Huang; Joseph A Kovacs; Kristina Crothers; Victoria A Silcott; Alison Morris; Joan R Turner; Charles B Beard; Henry Masur; Steven H Fischer Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2004-04-16 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet Journal: BMJ Date: 2003-01-04
Authors: Yvonne R Shea; J Lucian Davis; Laurence Huang; Joseph A Kovacs; Henry Masur; Francis Mulindwa; Sally Opus; Yuenwah Chow; Patrick R Murray Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2009-03-18 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Ana Esteve-Sole; Suly P Sánchez-Dávila; Angela Deyà-Martínez; Alexandra F Freeman; Adrian M Zelazny; John P Dekker; Pavel P Khil; Steven M Holland; Antoni Noguera-Julian; Jacinta Bustamante; Jean-Laurent Casanova; Manel Juan; Wilmer Cordova; Laia Alsina Journal: J Clin Immunol Date: 2018-07-23 Impact factor: 8.317
Authors: Maura Manion; Augusto Dulanto Chiang; Luxin Pei; Chun-Shu Wong; Pavel Khil; Dima A Hammoud; Megan Anderson; Elizabeth Laidlaw; Safia Kuriakose; Andrea Lisco; Adrian M Zelazny; John P Dekker; Irini Sereti Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2021-08-02 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: J Lucian Davis; Laurence Huang; William Worodria; Henry Masur; Adithya Cattamanchi; Charles Huber; Cecily Miller; Patricia S Conville; Patrick Murray; Joseph A Kovacs Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-01-27 Impact factor: 3.240