Literature DB >> 19205832

Preoperative MRI marking technique for the planning of breast-conserving surgery.

Norie Yamashiro1, Mitsuhiro Tozaki, Tomoko Ogawa, Naoko Kawano, Takako Suzuki, Shinji Ozaki, Naomi Sakamoto, Satoko Abe, Eisuke Fukuma.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When performing breast-conserving surgery (BCS), it is essential to achieve a complete resection of the tumor while preserving the cosmetic outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a MRI marking technique for planning of BCS.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 14 consecutive patients who underwent MRI in the supine position (supine MRI) using a MRI marking technique. The preoperative histopathological diagnosis was ductal carcinoma in situ in 11 and invasive ductal carcinoma in 3. All of the patients with invasive ductal carcinoma were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The pills of Breath Care used as MRI markers were placed in the Penrose drain with 2-cm intervals, and drains were put on the resection lines as determined by ultrasonography (US). The final resection lines were modified using information obtained by supine MRI. The rate of the margin-tumor distance (RMTD: longer margin-tumor distance/shorter margin-tumor distance) was calculated.
RESULTS: Thirteen patients (93%) needed modification of the first resection line, whereas one patient (7%) needed no modification. Twelve patients (86%) had negative margins, but two patients (14%) had positive margins: one patient had a medial margin, while the other had a distal margin. One patient showed a pathologically complete response after chemotherapy; the RMTD was not evaluated. Among the 12 patients with medial and lateral negative margins, the medial and lateral margin-tumor distances ranged from 1.0 to 3.5 cm (average 2.1 cm), and the RMTD ranged from 1 to 3.0 (average 1.5).
CONCLUSION: Our MRI marking technique may be useful for evaluating the extent of the tumor as determined by the US examination in difficult cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19205832     DOI: 10.1007/s12282-008-0088-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1340-6868            Impact factor:   4.239


  5 in total

Review 1.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy--is it worth the risk?

Authors:  Jean-Yves Petit; Umberto Veronesi; Visnu Lohsiriwat; PierCarlo Rey; Giuseppe Curigliano; Stefano Martella; Cristina Garusi; Francesca De Lorenzi; Andrea Manconi; Edoardo Botteri; Florence Didier; Roberto Orecchia; Mario Rietjens
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Predictive detection areas for identifying additional MRI-detected breast lesions on second-look ultrasonography.

Authors:  Akie Tanaka; Atsushi Yamada; Tomoko Umeda; Chiaki Kaneko; Tomoharu Shimizu; Shigeyuki Naka; Tohru Tani; Masaji Tani
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  The expression of PCNA, c-erbB-2, p53, ER and PR as well as atypical hyperplasia in tissues nearby the breast cancer.

Authors:  Zongliang Jia; Wei Zhao; Lin Fan; Wei Sheng
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 2.611

4.  Application of desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry imaging in breast cancer margin analysis.

Authors:  David Calligaris; Diana Caragacianu; Xiaohui Liu; Isaiah Norton; Christopher J Thompson; Andrea L Richardson; Mehra Golshan; Michael L Easterling; Sandro Santagata; Deborah A Dillon; Ferenc A Jolesz; Nathalie Y R Agar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Breast-conserving surgery with 3D-printed surgical guide: a single-center, prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Zhen-Yu Wu; Hee Jeong Kim; Jongwon Lee; Il Yong Chung; Jisun Kim; Saebyeol Lee; Byung Ho Son; Sei-Hyun Ahn; Hak Hee Kim; Joon Beom Seo; Jae Ho Jeong; Gyungyub Gong; Namkug Kim; BeomSeok Ko
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.