Literature DB >> 19204847

Body fat measurement in elite sport climbers: comparison of skinfold thickness equations with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Vanesa Espana Romero1, Jonatan R Ruiz, Francisco B Ortega, Enrique G Artero, German Vicente-Rodriguez, Luis A Moreno, Manuel J Castillo, Angel Gutierrez.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare equations for estimating percentage body fat from skinfold thickness in elite sport climbers by assessing their agreement with percentage body fat measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Skinfold thickness was measured in a convenience sample of 19 elite sport climbers [9 women and 10 men; mean age 31.2 years (s = 5.0) and 28.6 years (s = 3.6), respectively]. Percentage body fat was estimated using 17 different equations, and it was also measured by DXA. A significant inter-methods difference was observed for all equations, except for Durnin's equation in men (inter-methods difference: -0.57% and -0.29%; 1.96 s: 5.56 and 5.23 for Siri's and Brozek's equation, respectively) and women (inter-methods difference: -0.67% and -1.29% for Siri's and Brozek's equation, respectively), and for Wilmore's equation using Siri's body fat equation in women (inter-methods difference: -1.86%). In women, the limits of agreement were lower when using Durnin's equation compared with Wilmore's equation (1.96 s: 3.86% and 5.13%, respectively). In conclusion, of the 17 studied equations, Durnin's equation was the most accurate in estimating percentage body fat in both male and female elite climbers. Therefore, Durnin's equation could be used to assess percentage body fat in elite sport climbers if more accurate methods are not available. The generalizability of the results is limited by the fact that the sample was not selected at random.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19204847     DOI: 10.1080/02640410802603863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  5 in total

1.  Climbing time to exhaustion is a determinant of climbing performance in high-level sport climbers.

Authors:  Vanesa España-Romero; Francisco B Ortega Porcel; Enrique G Artero; David Jiménez-Pavón; Angel Gutiérrez Sainz; Manuel J Castillo Garzón; Jonatan R Ruiz
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  The role of physique, strength and endurance in the achievements of elite climbers.

Authors:  Mariusz Ozimek; Robert Rokowski; Paweł Draga; Vladimir Ljakh; Tadeusz Ambroży; Marcin Krawczyk; Tomasz Ręgwelski; Arkadiusz Stanula; Karol Görner; Adam Jurczak; Dariusz Mucha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Hangboard training in advanced climbers: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Saskia Mundry; Gino Steinmetz; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Arndt F Schilling; Volker R Schöffl; Dominik Saul
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A comparison of body composition assessment methods in climbers: Which is better?

Authors:  María José Arias Téllez; Fernando Carrasco; Vanesa España Romero; Jorge Inostroza; Alejandro Bustamante; Ignacio Solar Altamirano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Differences in Fat Mass Estimation Formulas in Physically Active Adult Population and Relationship with Sums of Skinfolds.

Authors:  Raquel Vaquero-Cristóbal; Mario Albaladejo-Saura; Ana E Luna-Badachi; Francisco Esparza-Ros
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.