Literature DB >> 19203422

The ability of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index to assess the nutritional status and predict the outcome of home-care resident elderly: a comparison with the Mini Nutritional Assessment.

Emanuele Cereda1, Chiara Pusani, Daniela Limonta, Alfredo Vanotti.   

Abstract

The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) is recommended for grading nutritional status in the elderly. A new index for predicting the risk of nutrition-related complications, the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), was recently proposed but little is known about its possible use in the assessment of nutritional status. Thus, we aimed to investigate its ability to assess the nutritional status and predict the outcome when compared with the MNA. Anthropometry and biochemical parameters were determined in 241 institutionalised elderly (ninety-four males and 147 females; aged 80.1 (SD 8.3) years). Nutritional risk and nutritional state were graded by the GNRI and MNA, respectively. At 6 months outcomes were: death; infections; bedsores. According to the GNRI and MNA, the prevalence of high risk (GNRI < 92)/malnutrition (MNA < 17), moderate risk (GNRI 92-98)/malnutrition at-risk (MNA 17-23.5) and no risk (GNRI > 98)/good status (MNA > 24) were 20.7/12.8%, 36.1/39% and 43.2/48.2%, respectively, with poor agreement in scoring the patient (Cohen's kappa test: kappa = 0.29; 95% CI 0.19, 0.39). GNRI categories showed a stronger association (OR) with overall outcomes than MNA classes, although no difference (P>0.05) was found between malnutrition (v. 'good status', OR 6.4; 95% CI 2.1, 71.9) and high nutritional risk (v. 'no risk', OR 9.7; 95% CI 3.0, 130). Multivariate logistic regression revealed the GNRI as an independent predictor of complications. In overall-outcome prediction, a good sensitivity was found only for GNRI < 98 (0.86 (95% CI 0.67, 0.96)). The combination of a GNRI > 98 with an MNA > 24 seemed to exclude adverse outcomes. The GNRI showed poor agreement with the MNA in nutritional assessment, but appeared to better predict outcome. In home-care resident elderly, outcome prediction should be performed by combining the suggestions from both these tools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19203422     DOI: 10.1017/S0007114509222677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  17 in total

1.  Nutritional Care Needs in Elderly Residents of Long-Term Care Institutions: Potential Implications for Policies.

Authors:  A Pezzana; E Cereda; P Avagnina; G Malfi; E Paiola; Z Frighi; I Capizzi; E Sgnaolin; M L Amerio
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 2.  Malnutrition Screening and Assessment in Hospitalised Older People: a Review.

Authors:  E Dent; E O Hoogendijk; R Visvanathan; O R L Wright
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.075

3.  Geriatric Nutrition Risk Index is an Important Predictor of Cancer-Specific Survival, but not Recurrence-Free Survival, in Patients Undergoing Surgical Resection for Non-Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Hideaki Miyake; Hiromoto Tei; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2017-03-30

4.  A prospective comparative study of the MNA-SF and GNRI nutritional screening tools in predicting infectious complications among elderly patients over 70 years undergoing posterior lumbar arthrodesis.

Authors:  Zhong-En Li; Shi-Bao Lu; Chao Kong; Wen-Zhi Sun; Peng Wang; Si-Tao Zhang
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  The accuracy of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in detecting frailty and sarcopenia in hospitalized older adults.

Authors:  Doha Rasheedy; Wessam Helmy El-Kawaly
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  Nutrition education intervention for dependent patients: protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Victoria Arija; Núria Martín; Teresa Canela; Carme Anguera; Ana I Castelao; Montserrat García-Barco; Antoni García-Campo; Ana I González-Bravo; Carme Lucena; Teresa Martínez; Silvia Fernández-Barrés; Roser Pedret; Waleska Badia; Josep Basora
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Nutritional screening is strongly associated with overall survival in patients treated with targeted agents for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Weijie Gu; Guiming Zhang; Lijiang Sun; Qi Ma; Yue Cheng; Hailiang Zhang; Guohai Shi; Yao Zhu; Dingwei Ye
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 12.910

8.  Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index as a Prognostic Factor for Mortality in Elderly Patients with Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injuries.

Authors:  Wei-Ti Su; Ching-Hua Tsai; Chun-Ying Huang; Sheng-En Chou; Chi Li; Shiun-Yuan Hsu; Ching-Hua Hsieh
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-06-10

9.  The energy intake through regular nontherapeutic meals provision in long-term care: impact on nutritional status and related Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index.

Authors:  Baerbel Sturtzel; Ibrahim Elmadfa; Gerald Ohrenberger
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-02-20

10.  The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index Predicts Survival in Elderly Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients with Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yacong Bo; Kunlun Wang; Yang Liu; Jie You; Han Cui; Yiwei Zhu; Quanjun Lu; Ling Yuan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.