Literature DB >> 19201421

Correlations between neoadjuvant treatment, anemia, and perioperative complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer.

Marcovalerio Melis1, James M McLoughlin, E Michelle Dean, Erin M Siegel, Jill M Weber, Nilay Shah, Scott T Kelley, Richard C Karl.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The influence of preoperative hemoglobin levels on outcomes of patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer is not clearly defined. The goal of this article was to explore the association between combined modality therapy, preoperative anemia status, and perioperative blood transfusion and risk of postoperative complications among patients undergoing esophageal resection.
METHODS: From a retrospective esophageal database, 413 patients were identified. Anemia was defined according to the World Health Organization classification of <13 g/dL or <12 g/dL for men or women, respectively. Statistical analysis was performed with analysis of variance, Pearson's chi(2), or Fisher exact test as appropriate. The independent association of anemia, blood transfusion, and combined modality treatment on risk of postoperative complications were examined using multiple logistic regression.
RESULTS: Information on combined modality treatment, preoperative hemoglobin levels, and blood transfusion was available for 413 patients, of whom 57% received combined modality treatment. Overall 197 (47.6%) patients were preoperatively found to be anemic, and those who had received combined modality treatment were more likely to be anemic (60.6% versus 30.7%, P < 0.001). Anemic patients required more blood transfusions than nonanemic patients (46.7% versus 29.6%, P < 0.001). Seventy-five percent of patients who required transfusion during the hospital stay had received combined modality treatment (P = 0.01). Combined modality treatment and anemia were not associated with increased risk of complications. Patients with any perioperative complication and surgical site infections were more likely to have received blood transfusion compared to patients without complications (OR = 1.73; 95% CI 1.04-2.87 and OR = 2.98; 95% CI 1.04-8.55; respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we determined that administration of neoadjuvant treatment to esophageal cancer patients was not associated with an increased rate of perioperative complications. Preoperative anemia did not predict worsened short-term outcomes, but increased the chances of red blood cell transfusion, which were significantly associated with higher overall complications and increased risk of surgical site infections. These data confirm previous studies that allogenic red blood cell transfusions are independent risk factors for increased morbidity and mortality and should be minimized during surgery for esophageal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19201421     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  9 in total

1.  Allogenic Blood Transfusion is Associated with Poor Perioperative and Long-Term Outcome in Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Matthias Reeh; Tarik Ghadban; Josephine Dedow; Eik Vettorazzi; Faik G Uzunoglu; Michael Nentwich; Stefan Kluge; Jakob R Izbicki; Yogesh K Vashist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Iron chelation: a potential therapeutic strategy in oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  B D Keeler; M J Brookes
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  [Anastomoses in the upper gastrointestinal tract].

Authors:  K Schwameis; J Zacherl
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Chemotherapy within 30 days prior to liver resection does not increase postoperative morbidity or mortality.

Authors:  Bridget N Fahy; Thomas A Aloia; Stephen L Jones; Barbara L Bass; Craig P Fischer
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Short- and long term effects of epidural analgesia on morbidity and mortality of esophageal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Sebastian Heinrich; Katrin Janitz; Susanne Merkel; Peter Klein; Joachim Schmidt
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-09-21       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 6.  Anaemia in the older surgical patient: a review of prevalence, causes, implications and management.

Authors:  Judith Partridge; Danielle Harari; Jessica Gossage; Jugdeep Dhesi
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Epidural analgesia and avoidance of blood transfusion are associated with reduced mortality in patients with postoperative pulmonary complications following thoracotomic esophagectomy: a retrospective cohort study of 335 patients.

Authors:  Kai B Kaufmann; Wolfgang Baar; Torben Glatz; Jens Hoeppner; Hartmut Buerkle; Ulrich Goebel; Sebastian Heinrich
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Surgical approach and the impact of epidural analgesia on survival after esophagectomy for cancer: A population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kenneth C Cummings Iii; Tzuyung Doug Kou; Amitabh Chak; Mark D Schluchter; Seunghee Margevicius; Gregory S Cooper; Neal J Meropol; Yaron Perry; Philip A Linden; Linda C Cummings
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol to promote recovery following esophageal cancer resection.

Authors:  Apurva Ashok; Devayani Niyogi; Priya Ranganathan; Sandeep Tandon; Maheema Bhaskar; George Karimundackal; Sabita Jiwnani; Madhavi Shetmahajan; C S Pramesh
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.549

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.