Literature DB >> 19201372

Temporal trends in utilization of cardiac computed tomography.

Ala-Eddin M Ayyad1, Jason Cole, Asmir Syed, Milind Y Desai, Sandra Halliburton, Paul Schoenhagen, Scott D Flamm, Srikanth Sola.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Appropriate, inappropriate, and uncertain indications for the use of cardiac computed tomography (CT) were defined by a multisociety document in 2006. We sought to compare the appropriateness of cardiac CT examinations before and after these criteria were published.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all patients presenting for cardiac CT examinations in the first 3 months of 2006 and 2007 at a large academic medical center and an unaffiliated large cardiology group private practice. The indication for the examinations were determined from the patients' medical records. The examinations were then classified as "appropriate," "inappropriate," or "uncertain," based on appropriateness criteria. Examinations that did not fall into any of these categories were classified as "uncategorized."
RESULTS: We evaluated a total of 1409 patients (64.9% men; mean age, 57.6 +/- 13.4 years). The proportion of appropriate CT examinations increased from 69.5% during the study period in 2006 to 78.5% in 2007 (P = 0.001). A corresponding decrease was observed in inappropriate CT examinations from 11.5% in 2006 to 4.6% in 2007 (P = 0.001). No change was observed in the number of CT examinations that were deemed uncertain (12.7% in 2006, and 13.3% in 2007; P = NS).
CONCLUSION: The number of CT examinations considered appropriate increased during the study period, whereas the number of inappropriate examinations decreased. Cardiologists were more likely than noncardiologists to order examinations that were appropriate during the study period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19201372     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2008.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr        ISSN: 1876-861X


  12 in total

1.  Appropriateness and utilization of cardiac CT: implications for development of future criteria.

Authors:  Meagan K Murphy; Thomas J Brady; Khurram Nasir; G Scott Gazelle; Fabian Bamberg; Quynh A Truong; Wilfred S Mamuya; Suhny Abbara; Thomas H Lee; Ron Blankstein
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Appropriateness of referrals for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI) in a developing community: a comparison between 2005 and 2009 versions of ACCF/ASNC appropriateness criteria.

Authors:  Ali Gholamrezanezhad; Ahmadali Shirafkan; Sahar Mirpour; Mehdi Rayatnavaz; Azita Alborzi; Mehdi Mogharrabi; Sepideh Hassanpour; Mohammadali Ramezani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Radioprotection (un)awareness in cardiologists, and how to improve it.

Authors:  C Carpeggiani; G Kraft; D Caramella; R Semelka; E Picano
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Radiation exposure from imaging tests: is there an increased cancer risk?

Authors:  Patricia K Nguyen; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2011-02

5.  Use of non-indicated cardiac testing in low-risk patients: Choosing Wisely.

Authors:  Carrie H Colla; Thomas D Sequist; Meredith B Rosenthal; William L Schpero; Daniel J Gottlieb; Nancy E Morden
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 7.035

6.  Use of the anterior-posterior chest diameter in CT: reduction in radiation dose?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J D Schuijf; J J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  100 kV versus 120 kV: effective reduction in radiation dose?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J W Jukema; J D Schuijf; J J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  The radiation issue in cardiology: the time for action is now.

Authors:  Eugenio Picano; Eliseo Vano
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 2.062

9.  The risks of inappropriateness in cardiac imaging.

Authors:  Eugenio Picano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Use of the Corus® CAD Gene Expression Test for Assessment of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Likelihood in Symptomatic Non-Diabetic Patients.

Authors:  Jose Vargas; Joao A C Lima; William E Kraus; Pamela S Douglas; Steven Rosenberg
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2013-08-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.