Literature DB >> 19200937

Genetic background affects the biomechanical behavior of the postpartum mouse cervix.

Catalin S Buhimschi1, Nicoleta Sora, Guomao Zhao, Irina A Buhimschi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that the genetic makeup has an impact on the functional behavior of the uterine cervix. Therefore, we compared the biomechanical properties of uterine cervix in postpartum in 2 strains of mice that differ in their underlying regenerative collagen remodeling characteristics: MRL/MpJ+/+ (MRL: high regenerative repair) and C57BL/6 (C57: low regenerative high fibrotic repair). STUDY
DESIGN: Cervical tensile proprieties were assessed on day 3, 15, and 60 postpartum in MRL (n = 14) and C57 (n = 13) mice (4-5 animals at each time point). Stress-strain curves were generated using Shimadzu EZ-test instrumentation. Cervical tissue was stretched by 0.42 mm/min until rupture. Parameters of viscoelasticity including slope (a measure of stiffness), yield point (YP; moment when tissue changes its proprieties from elastic to plastic), and break point (BP; measure of tissue strength) were recorded and analyzed blindly between strains. Data were normalized to the weight of the tissue and analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance. Histological and collagen birefringence evaluation of the uterine cervix (MRL: n = 4; C57: n = 4) was performed 5 days after delivery.
RESULTS: At 3 and 15 days postpartum, cervices of MRL mice were significantly more compliant than those of C57 (P < .001). MRL mice displayed a significant increase in stiffness from day 3 to day 60 (slope, median +/- SEM: day 3: 3.1 +/- 0.5 vs day 15: 20.3 +/- 4.9 vs day 60: 33.1 +/- 3.5 N/mm per gram; P < .001). In contrast, the stiffness of C57 cervices reached maximum on day 15 (slope day 3: 14.1 +/- 4.3 vs day 15: 40.0 +/- 6.5 N/mm per gram; P = .02) and rested at a similar level on day 60 (day 60: 26.1 +/- 7.0 N/mm per gram; day 60 vs day 15: P = .937). More force was required to reach YP in C57 on day 3 (C57: 72.5 +/- 14.7 vs MRL: 19.9 +/- 1.6 N/g; P < .001) but not on either day 15 (C57: 156.1 +/- 27.5 vs MRL: 109.2 +/- 26.0 N/g; P = .120) or on day 60 (C57: 143.4 +/- 26.5 vs MRL: 164.5 +/- 18.7 N/g; P = .412). There was a significant decrease in BP in both strains on both day 15 and day 60 compared with day 3 postpartum (P = .856 for strain, P = .008 for day). MRL mice displayed significantly less cervical collagen birefringence compared with C57 control (P < .001) but increased proteoglycan staining and increased water content.
CONCLUSION: We provide evidence that genetic makeup may have an impact on cervical tissue remodeling and function. There are significant differences in postpartum cervical stiffness and compliance that vary with the regenerative collagen remodeling phenotype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19200937      PMCID: PMC4853198          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  41 in total

1.  Further evidence of a decorin-collagen interaction in the disruption of cervical collagen fibers during rat gestation.

Authors:  P C Leppert; R Kokenyesi; C A Klemenich; J Fisher
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Spallanzani's mouse: a model of restoration and regeneration.

Authors:  E Heber-Katz; J M Leferovich; K Bedelbaeva; D Gourevitch
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 3.  Dynamics of cervical remodeling during pregnancy and parturition: mechanisms and current concepts.

Authors:  R Ann Word; Xiang-Hong Li; Michael Hnat; Kelley Carrick
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.303

4.  Biomechanical properties of the lower uterine segment above and below the reflection of the urinary bladder flap.

Authors:  Catalin S Buhimschi; Irina A Buhimschi; Guomao Zhao; Edmund Funai; Gheorghe Peltecu; George R Saade; Carl P Weiner
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Relationship between dilatation of the rat uterine cervix and a small dermatan sulfate proteoglycan.

Authors:  R Kokenyesi; J F Woessner
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.285

6.  Differential regulation of nitric oxide in the rat uterus and cervix during pregnancy and labour.

Authors:  I Buhimschi; M Ali; V Jain; K Chwalisz; R E Garfield
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 7.  Anatomy and physiology of cervical ripening.

Authors:  P C Leppert
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.190

8.  Heart regeneration in adult MRL mice.

Authors:  J M Leferovich; K Bedelbaeva; S Samulewicz; X M Zhang; D Zwas; E B Lankford; E Heber-Katz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-07       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Reparative myocardial mechanisms in adult C57BL/6 and MRL mice following injury.

Authors:  R Haris Naseem; Annette P Meeson; J Michael Dimaio; Michael D White; Justin Kallhoff; Caroline Humphries; Sean C Goetsch; Leon J De Windt; Maurice A Williams; Mary G Garry; Daniel J Garry
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 3.107

10.  Labor-associated gene expression in the human uterine fundus, lower segment, and cervix.

Authors:  Radek Bukowski; Gary D V Hankins; George R Saade; Garland D Anderson; Steven Thornton
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  4 in total

1.  Myometrial wound healing post-Cesarean delivery in the MRL/MpJ mouse model of uterine scarring.

Authors:  Catalin S Buhimschi; Guomao Zhao; Nicoleta Sora; Joseph A Madri; Irina A Buhimschi
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Cervical collagen network remodeling in normal pregnancy and disrupted parturition in Antxr2 deficient mice.

Authors:  Kyoko Yoshida; Claire Reeves; Joy Vink; Jan Kitajewski; Ronald Wapner; Hongfeng Jiang; Serge Cremers; Kristin Myers
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Evaluation of cervical stiffness during pregnancy using semiquantitative ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  E Hernandez-Andrade; S S Hassan; H Ahn; S J Korzeniewski; L Yeo; T Chaiworapongsa; R Romero
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 4.  Relationships between mechanical properties and extracellular matrix constituents of the cervical stroma during pregnancy.

Authors:  Michael House; David L Kaplan; Simona Socrate
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.300

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.