Literature DB >> 19200581

Pattern of chromosomal aberrations in primary liver cancers identified by comparative genomic hybridization.

Kia Homayounfar1, Bastian Gunawan, Silke Cameron, Florian Haller, Daniel Baumhoer, Stefan Uecker, Bjoern Sander, Giuliano Ramadori, Thomas Lorf, László Füzesi.   

Abstract

Little is known about the molecular cytogenetic changes in cholangiocarcinoma and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma, and on the prognostic significance of chromosomal imbalances in hepatocellular carcinoma. Seventy-eight cases of primary liver cancer with available median follow-up of 16.5 months, including 49 hepatocellular carcinomas, 22 cholangiocarcinomas, and 7 combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinomas, were examined by comparative genomic hybridization. In hepatocellular carcinoma, the most frequent changes were +8q (54%), -8p (54%), and +1q (42%), followed by -6q (35%), -4q (33%), -13q (29%), -14q (25%), -16q (19%), -17p (19%), +17q (17%), and +20q (15%). In comparison, cholangiocarcinoma had more gains, losses, and breakpoints than hepatocellular carcinoma or combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma, specifically more frequently -6q (91%), -3p (68%), -9p (55%), -14q (55%), -13q (45%), +1q (41%), +7q (36%), +7p (32%), and +8q (32%). Combined losses at 6q and 3p appeared to be highly characteristic for cholangiocarcinoma. In contrast, combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma shared frequent +1q (71%), +8q (57%), and -8p (57%) with hepatocellular carcinoma, but a tendency for higher numbers of imbalances with cholangiocarcinoma. Overall, higher numbers of changes, breakpoints, or gains appeared to carry unfavorable prognostic value among hepatocellular carcinomas, with higher numbers of gains retaining prognostic value among R0-resected hepatocellular carcinomas. Cholangiocarcinoma is characterized by combined losses at 6q and 3p and a tendency for chromosomal instability. On the other hand, combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma may share similar chromosomal changes with both hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma, as reflected by common hepatocellular carcinoma-like +8q, +1q, and -8p and a tendency for cholangiocarcinoma-like chromosomal instability. In hepatocellular carcinoma, higher number of gains may prove an adverse prognostic parameter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19200581     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2008.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  16 in total

1.  Building a staircase to precision medicine for biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  Nataliya Razumilava; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Array comparative genomic hybridization identifies novel potential therapeutic targets in cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Siobhan C McKay; Kristian Unger; Stephanos Pericleous; Gordon Stamp; Gerry Thomas; Robert R Hutchins; Duncan R C Spalding
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis reveals recurrent genomic alterations associated with histopathologic features in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Wan-Ting Huang; Shao-Wen Weng; Yu-Ching Wei; Huey-Ling You; Jui-Tzu Wang; Hock-Liew Eng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-09-15

Review 4.  Genetic profiling of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jesper B Andersen; Snorri S Thorgeirsson
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.287

5.  Loss of heterozygosity of the tumor suppressor gene Tg737 in the side population cells of hepatocellular carcinomas is associated with poor prognosis.

Authors:  Zhi Song; Ren Li; Nan You; Kaishan Tao; Kefeng Dou
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 6.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: Surgeon's view on latest findings and future perspectives.

Authors:  Jan Erik Slotta; Otto Kollmar; Volker Ellenrieder; B Michael Ghadimi; Kia Homayounfar
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-05-28

Review 7.  Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: pathogenesis and rationale for molecular therapies.

Authors:  D Sia; V Tovar; A Moeini; J M Llovet
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 8.  Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Sumera Rizvi; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Exome sequencing of liver fluke-associated cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Choon Kiat Ong; Chutima Subimerb; Chawalit Pairojkul; Sopit Wongkham; Ioana Cutcutache; Willie Yu; John R McPherson; George E Allen; Cedric Chuan Young Ng; Bernice Huimin Wong; Swe Swe Myint; Vikneswari Rajasegaran; Hong Lee Heng; Anna Gan; Zhi Jiang Zang; Yingting Wu; Jeanie Wu; Ming Hui Lee; DaChuan Huang; Pauline Ong; Waraporn Chan-on; Yun Cao; Chao-Nan Qian; Kiat Hon Lim; Aikseng Ooi; Karl Dykema; Kyle Furge; Veerapol Kukongviriyapan; Banchob Sripa; Chaisiri Wongkham; Puangrat Yongvanit; P Andrew Futreal; Vajarabhongsa Bhudhisawasdi; Steve Rozen; Patrick Tan; Bin Tean Teh
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-05-06       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Clinical and biological significance of precursor lesions of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Mark Ettel; Ogechukwu Eze; Ruliang Xu
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-11-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.