Literature DB >> 19199497

Intraoperative monitoring of visual evoked potential: introduction of a clinically useful method.

Tatsuya Sasaki1, Takeshi Itakura, Kyouichi Suzuki, Hiromichi Kasuya, Ryoji Munakata, Hiroyuki Muramatsu, Tsuyoshi Ichikawa, Taku Sato, Yuji Endo, Jun Sakuma, Masato Matsumoto.   

Abstract

OBJECT: To obtain a clinically useful method of intraoperative monitoring of visual evoked potentials (VEPs), the authors developed a new light-stimulating device and introduced electroretinography (ERG) to ascertain retinal light stimulation after induction of venous anesthesia.
METHODS: The new stimulating device consists of 16 red light-emitting diodes embedded in a soft silicone disc to avoid deviation of the light axis after frontal scalp-flap reflection. After induction of venous anesthesia with propofol, the authors performed ERG and VEP recording in 100 patients (200 eyes) who were at intraoperative risk for visual impairment.
RESULTS: Stable ERG and VEP recordings were obtained in 187 eyes. In 12 eyes, stable ERG data were recorded but VEPs could not be obtained, probably because all 12 eyes manifested severe preoperative visual dysfunction. The disappearance of ERG data and VEPs in the 13th eye after frontal scalp-flap reflection suggested technical failure attributable to deviation of the light axis. The criterion for amplitude changes was defined as a 50% increase or decrease in amplitude compared with the control level. In 1 of 187 eyes the authors observed an increase in intraoperative amplitude and postoperative visual function improvement. Of 169 eyes without amplitude changes, 17 manifested improved visual function postoperatively, 150 showed no change, and 2 worsened (1 patient with a temporal tumor developed a slight visual field defect in both eyes). Of 3 eyes with intraoperative VEP deterioration and subsequent recovery upon changing the operative maneuver, 1 improved and 2 exhibited no change. The VEP amplitude decreased without subsequent recovery to 50% of the control level in 14 eyes, and all of these developed various degrees of postoperative deterioration of visual function.
CONCLUSIONS: With the strategy introduced here it is possible to record intraoperative VEPs in almost all patients except in those with severe visual dysfunction. In some patients, postoperative visual deterioration can be avoided or minimized by intraoperative VEP recording. All patients without an intraoperative decrease in the VEP amplitude were without severe postoperative deterioration in visual function, suggesting that intraoperative VEP monitoring may contribute to prevent postoperative visual dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19199497     DOI: 10.3171/2008.9.JNS08451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  21 in total

1.  Intraoperative flash VEPs are reproducible in the presence of low amplitude EEG.

Authors:  David A Houlden; Chantal A Turgeon; Thomas Polis; John Sinclair; Stuart Coupland; Pierre Bourque; Martin Corsten; Amin Kassam
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Optic nerve potentials and cortical potentials after stimulation of the anterior visual pathway during neurosurgery.

Authors:  Mitja Benedičič; Roman Bošnjak
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring during an optic nerve schwannoma removal.

Authors:  Daniel San-Juan; Manuel Escanio Cortés; Martha Tena-Suck; Adolfo Josué Orozco Garduño; Jesús Alejandro López Pizano; Jonathan Villanueva Domínguez; Maricarmen Fernández Gónzalez-Aragón; Juan Luis Gómez-Amador
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  A pilot study to record visual evoked potentials during prone spine surgery using the SightSaver™ photic visual stimulator.

Authors:  E M Soffin; R G Emerson; J Cheng; K Mercado; K Smith; J D Beckman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Cortical potentials after electrical intraneural stimulation of the optic nerve during orbital enucleation.

Authors:  Mitja Benedičič; Matej Beltram; Brigita Drnovšek Olup; Roman Bošnjak
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Implementation of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring during Endovascular Procedures in the Central Nervous System.

Authors:  Alicia Martinez Piñeiro; Carles Cubells; Pablo Garcia; Carlos Castaño; Antonio Dávalos; Jaume Coll-Canti
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2015-03

7.  Effectiveness of intraoperative visual evoked potential in avoiding visual deterioration during endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumors.

Authors:  Kentaro Toyama; Masahiko Wanibuchi; Toshimi Honma; Katsuya Komatsu; Yukinori Akiyama; Takeshi Mikami; Nobuhiro Mikuni
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 8.  Intra-operative neurophysiological mapping and monitoring during brain tumour surgery in children: an update.

Authors:  Angela Coppola; Vincenzo Tramontano; Federica Basaldella; Chiara Arcaro; Giovanna Squintani; Francesco Sala
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 1.475

9.  Differential effects of sevoflurane and propofol on an electroretinogram and visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Ryusuke Tanaka; Satoshi Tanaka; Takashi Ichino; Takashi Ishida; Satoshi Fuseya; Mikito Kawamata
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.078

10.  Electroretinography during embolization of an ophthalmic arteriovenous fistula.

Authors:  David J Padalino; Vladyslav Melnyk; Geoffrey Allott; Eric M Deshaies
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-03-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.