Kapil Sayal1, Robert Goodman. 1. Section of Developmental Psychiatry, E Floor, South Block, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK. kapil.sayal@nottingham.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines for the evaluation of children with suspected hyperkinetic disorder or ADHD recommend that information is collected from teachers. METHODS: Using the development and well-being assessment, parents of 5-16 year olds participating in the 1999 and 2004 British Child and Adolescent Mental Health Surveys were asked about symptoms relating to hyperkinetic disorder and reports of teacher complaints about these symptoms. We examined whether parental reports about symptoms at school reflect teacher ratings and can be relied upon by clinicians. RESULTS: Parent reports about symptoms at school were moderately correlated with teacher ratings. If children potentially met criteria for hyperkinetic disorder based on parental ratings only, the positive predictive value (PPV) for a research diagnosis of hyperkinetic disorder was 47%. When parents reported high levels of symptoms at school in addition to sufficient parent-rated symptoms and impairment, the PPV for a diagnosis of hyperkinetic disorder increased to 59%. CONCLUSIONS: In a community sample, we found that parental reports about symptoms at school have limited utility in predicting teacher ratings. Our findings highlight that it is desirable and worthwhile for clinicians to obtain direct information from the teacher. If this is unavailable, clinicians and researchers should be aware that "second-hand" information about symptoms at school is second best.
BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines for the evaluation of children with suspected hyperkinetic disorder or ADHD recommend that information is collected from teachers. METHODS: Using the development and well-being assessment, parents of 5-16 year olds participating in the 1999 and 2004 British Child and Adolescent Mental Health Surveys were asked about symptoms relating to hyperkinetic disorder and reports of teacher complaints about these symptoms. We examined whether parental reports about symptoms at school reflect teacher ratings and can be relied upon by clinicians. RESULTS: Parent reports about symptoms at school were moderately correlated with teacher ratings. If children potentially met criteria for hyperkinetic disorder based on parental ratings only, the positive predictive value (PPV) for a research diagnosis of hyperkinetic disorder was 47%. When parents reported high levels of symptoms at school in addition to sufficient parent-rated symptoms and impairment, the PPV for a diagnosis of hyperkinetic disorder increased to 59%. CONCLUSIONS: In a community sample, we found that parental reports about symptoms at school have limited utility in predicting teacher ratings. Our findings highlight that it is desirable and worthwhile for clinicians to obtain direct information from the teacher. If this is unavailable, clinicians and researchers should be aware that "second-hand" information about symptoms at school is second best.
Authors: Susan D Cochran; Jack Drescher; Eszter Kismödi; Alain Giami; Claudia García-Moreno; Elham Atalla; Adele Marais; Elisabeth Meloni Vieira; Geoffrey M Reed Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2014-06-17 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Renata R Kieling; Christian Kieling; Ana Paula Aguiar; Adriana C Costa; Beatriz V Dorneles; Luis A Rohde Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2013-09-03 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Andrew S Rowland; Betty J Skipper; David M Umbach; David L Rabiner; Richard A Campbell; Albert J Naftel; Dale P Sandler Journal: J Atten Disord Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 3.256
Authors: Megan E Narad; Annie A Garner; James L Peugh; Leanne Tamm; Tanya N Antonini; Kathleen M Kingery; John O Simon; Jeffery N Epstein Journal: Psychol Assess Date: 2014-09-15
Authors: Philip Wilson; Paul Bradshaw; Sarah Tipping; Marion Henderson; Geoff Der; Helen Minnis Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2012-07-27 Impact factor: 3.710