Literature DB >> 19195890

The temporal-spatial and ground reaction impulses of turning gait: is turning symmetrical?

Siobhan C Strike1, Matthew J D Taylor.   

Abstract

This study had two aims. Firstly, to characterise the temporal-spatial and ground reaction impulse adjustments, compared to straight gait, required to complete step turns to the left and to the right and secondly, to assess if the turns were asymmetrical. Seven participants were instructed to perform 90 degrees step turns to the left and right. The actual angle turned was less for both turns (right 80.2+/-5.5 degrees , left 82.8+/-5.3 degrees ). Data were collected using a 7 camera VICON infra-red motion analysis system (120 Hz) and a Kistler force plate (600 Hz). Adjustments were made in the approach, turn and depart strides compared to straight gait. The mean velocity was significantly lower and the stride was significantly shorter in the approach stride before the turn (p<0.0125) compared to straight gait, indicating a possible feed-forward mechanism prior to turning. Velocity was significantly lower and the stride length significantly shorter during the depart stride (p<0.0125) compared to straight gait. Participants did not return to a normal pattern within one stride. For the turn step, the velocity, step length and step width were all significantly different (p<0.0125) compared to straight gait. The turning ground reaction impulses were significantly greater (p<0.0125) compared to straight gait, indicating a need for increased support, medial shift, braking and propulsion. The turns to the left and right were statistically asymmetrical (p<0.0125) in 11 of the 18 variables. However, impulses were generally symmetrical, which does not generally support the functional asymmetry theory, though the contributions to propulsion were significantly greater when turning from the dominant limb.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19195890     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  13 in total

1.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Virtual Reality-based Turning on a Self-Paced Linear Treadmill.

Authors:  Keonyoung Oh; Christopher J Stanley; Diane L Damiano; Jonghyun Kim; Jungwon Yoon; Hyung-Soon Park
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Gait and its assessment in psychiatry.

Authors:  Richard D Sanders; Paulette Marie Gillig
Journal:  Psychiatry (Edgmont)       Date:  2010-07

Review 3.  Gait dynamics in Parkinson's disease: common and distinct behavior among stride length, gait variability, and fractal-like scaling.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Hausdorff
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.642

4.  Younger is not always better: development of locomotor adaptation from childhood to adulthood.

Authors:  Erin V L Vasudevan; Gelsy Torres-Oviedo; Susanne M Morton; Jaynie F Yang; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  General and Specific Strategies Used to Facilitate Locomotor Maneuvers.

Authors:  Mengnan Wu; Jesse H Matsubara; Keith E Gordon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Kinematics of turning during walking over ground and on a rotating treadmill.

Authors:  Janez Pavčič; Zlatko Matjačić; Andrej Olenšek
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Comparison of the COM-FCP inclination angle and other mediolateral stability indicators for turning.

Authors:  Rui Xu; Xin Wang; Jiajia Yang; Feng He; Xin Zhao; Hongzhi Qi; Peng Zhou; Dong Ming
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  A Prosthetic Shank With Adaptable Torsion Stiffness and Foot Alignment.

Authors:  Jochen Schuy; Nadine Stech; Graham Harris; Philipp Beckerle; Saeed Zahedi; Stephan Rinderknecht
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Normal inter-limb differences during the straight leg raise neurodynamic test: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Benjamin S Boyd; Philip S Villa
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Smartphone App-Based Assessment of Gait During Normal and Dual-Task Walking: Demonstration of Validity and Reliability.

Authors:  Brad Manor; Wanting Yu; Hao Zhu; Rachel Harrison; On-Yee Lo; Lewis Lipsitz; Thomas Travison; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Junhong Zhou
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.