Literature DB >> 19195518

Diagnostic and prognostic utility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in light-chain cardiac amyloidosis.

Frederick L Ruberg1, Evan Appelbaum, Ravin Davidoff, Al Ozonoff, Kraig V Kissinger, Caitlin Harrigan, Martha Skinner, Warren J Manning.   

Abstract

Although the presence of abnormal late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in cardiac amyloidosis has been well established, its prognostic implication and utility to identify cardiac involvement in patients with systemic amyloidosis is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic and prognostic significance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with amyloid light-chain amyloidosis but unknown cardiac involvement. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging with LGE was performed in 28 patients with systemic amyloidosis. The presence of cardiac amyloidosis was determined by separate clinical evaluation. The performance of LGE for the prediction of cardiac amyloidosis and prognostic implications of LGE were determined. LGE was observed in 19 patients (68%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of LGE for the identification of clinical cardiac involvement were 86%, 86%, 95%, and 67%, respectively. During a median follow-up period of 29 months, there were 5 deaths (82% survival). LGE itself did not predict survival (p = 0.62). LGE volume was positively correlated with serum level of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP; R = 0.64, p < or =0.001), and in multivariate analysis, LGE volume proved the strongest independent predictor of BNP. BNP was correlated with New York Heart Association class (p = 0.03). Reduced right ventricular end-diastolic volume (p <0.01) and stroke volume (p = 0.02) were associated with mortality. In conclusion, in patients with systemic amyloidosis, LGE is highly sensitive and specific for the identification of cardiac involvement but does not predict survival. LGE is strongly correlated with heart failure severity as assessed by BNP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19195518      PMCID: PMC2680134          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.09.105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  15 in total

Review 1.  Molecular mechanisms of amyloidosis.

Authors:  Giampaolo Merlini; Vittorio Bellotti
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: current and emerging applications.

Authors:  João A C Lima; Milind Y Desai
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Diagnosis and management of the cardiac amyloidoses.

Authors:  Rodney H Falk
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Contribution of magnetic resonance imaging in the differential diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis and symmetric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  R Fattori; G Rocchi; F Celletti; P Bertaccini; C Rapezzi; G Gavelli
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Assessment of restrictive cardiomyopathy of amyloid or idiopathic etiology by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  F Celletti; R Fattori; G Napoli; O Leone; G Rocchi; L B Reggiani; G Gavelli
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Non-invasive evaluation of the myocardial substrate of cardiac amyloidosis by gadolinium cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  E Perugini; C Rapezzi; T Piva; O Leone; L Bacchi-Reggiani; L Riva; F Salvi; L Lovato; A Branzi; R Fattori
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-06-06       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Right ventricular dilation in primary amyloidosis: an independent predictor of survival.

Authors:  A R Patel; S W Dubrey; L A Mendes; M Skinner; A Cupples; R H Falk; R Davidoff
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in cardiac amyloidosis.

Authors:  Alicia Maria Maceira; Jayshree Joshi; Sanjay Kumar Prasad; James Charles Moon; Enrica Perugini; Idris Harding; Mary Noelle Sheppard; Philip Alexander Poole-Wilson; Philip Nigel Hawkins; Dudley John Pennell
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-01-03       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Characterization of viable and nonviable myocardium at MR imaging: comparison of gadolinium-based extracellular and blood pool contrast materials versus manganese-based contrast materials in a rat myocardial infarction model.

Authors:  Sebastian Flacke; John S Allen; Jon M Chia; James H Wible; M Peri Periasamy; Max D Adams; I Kofi Adzamli; Christine H Lorenz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-01-24       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in clinically suspected cardiac amyloidosis: noninvasive imaging compared to endomyocardial biopsy.

Authors:  Holger Vogelsberg; Heiko Mahrholdt; Claudia C Deluigi; Ali Yilmaz; Eva M Kispert; Simon Greulich; Karin Klingel; Reinhard Kandolf; Udo Sechtem
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  46 in total

Review 1.  The role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Mohammad Naseem Shareef
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 2.  Role of cardiac MRI in the assessment of nonischemic cardiomyopathies.

Authors:  Mahwash Kassi; Faisal Nabi
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep

Review 3.  Amyloidotic cardiomyopathy: multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  David C Seldin; John L Berk; Flora Sam; Vaishali Sanchorawala
Journal:  Heart Fail Clin       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.179

Review 4.  Cardiac amyloidosis: An update on pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Omar K Siddiqi; Frederick L Ruberg
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 6.677

5.  ASNC/AHA/ASE/EANM/HFSA/ISA/SCMR/SNMMI expert consensus recommendations for multimodality imaging in cardiac amyloidosis: Part 1 of 2-evidence base and standardized methods of imaging.

Authors:  Sharmila Dorbala; Yukio Ando; Sabahat Bokhari; Angela Dispenzieri; Rodney H Falk; Victor A Ferrari; Marianna Fontana; Olivier Gheysens; Julian D Gillmore; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Mazen A Hanna; Bouke P C Hazenberg; Arnt V Kristen; Raymond Y Kwong; Mathew S Maurer; Giampaolo Merlini; Edward J Miller; James C Moon; Venkatesh L Murthy; C Cristina Quarta; Claudio Rapezzi; Frederick L Ruberg; Sanjiv J Shah; Riemer H J A Slart; Hein J Verberne; Jamieson M Bourque
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in heart failure: where the alphabet begins!

Authors:  Ahmed Aljizeeri; Abdulbaset Sulaiman; Naji Alhulaimi; Ahmed Alsaileek; Mouaz H Al-Mallah
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 7.  New and Evolving Concepts Regarding the Prognosis and Treatment of Cardiac Amyloidosis.

Authors:  Stefano Perlini; Roberta Mussinelli; Francesco Salinaro
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2016-12

8.  Prognostic impact of T2-weighted CMR imaging for cardiac amyloidosis.

Authors:  Ralf Wassmuth; Hassan Abdel-Aty; Steffen Bohl; Jeanette Schulz-Menger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  [Clinical indications for the use of cardiac MRI. By the SIRM Study Group on Cardiac Imaging].

Authors:  E Di Cesare; F Cademartiri; I Carbone; A Carriero; M Centonze; F De Cobelli; R De Rosa; P Di Renzi; A Esposito; R Faletti; R Fattori; M Francone; A Giovagnoni; L La Grutta; G Ligabue; L Lovato; R Marano; M Midiri; A Romagnoli; V Russo; F Sardanelli; L Natale; J Bogaert; A De Roos
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 10.  Currents concepts on the immunopathology of amyloidosis.

Authors:  Anupama Bhat; Carlo Selmi; Stanley M Naguwa; Gurtej S Cheema; M Eric Gershwin
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.667

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.