| Literature DB >> 19194857 |
Akizumi Tsutsumi1, Noboru Iwata, Naotaka Watanabe, Jan de Jonge, Hynek Pikhart, Juan Antonio Fernández-López, Liying Xu, Richard Peter, Anders Knutsson, Isabelle Niedhammer, Norito Kawakami, Johannes Siegrist.
Abstract
Our objective was to examine cross-cultural comparability of standard scales of the Effort-Reward Imbalance occupational stress scales by item response theory (IRT) analyses. Data were from 20,256 Japanese employees, 1464 Dutch nurses and nurses' aides, 2128 representative employees from post-communist countries, 963 Swedish representative employees, 421 Chinese female employees, 10,175 employees of the French national gas and electric company and 734 Spanish railroad employees, sanitary personnel and telephone operators. The IRT likelihood ratio model was used for differential item functioning (DIF) and differential test functioning (DTF) analyses. Despite the existence of DIF, most comparisons did not show discernible differences in the relations between Effort-Reward total score and level of the underlying trait across cultural groups. In the case that DTF was suspected, excluding an item with significant DIF improved the comparability. The full cross-cultural comparability of Effort-Reward Imbalance scores can be achieved with the help of IRT analysis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19194857 PMCID: PMC6878581 DOI: 10.1002/mpr.277
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res ISSN: 1049-8931 Impact factor: 4.035