Literature DB >> 19194715

Detection of colonic polyps according to insertion/withdrawal phases of colonoscopy.

Sergio Morini1, Cesare Hassan, Angelo Zullo, Roberto Lorenzetti, Marina de Matthaeis, Francesca Stella, Salvatore M A Campo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Issues on colonoscopy quality are crucial to reduce the advanced neoplasia miss rate of colonoscopy. Recently, a >6-min withdrawal time has been recommended. However, the relative prevalence of polyp detected during insertion and withdrawal phases of colonoscopy is unknown. Therefore, we designed this prospective, endoscopic study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and sixty-eight patients with 396 adenomas were selected from a consecutive colonoscopic series of 1,205 cases. Detection rates of adenomas, advanced adenomas, and cancer according to withdrawal and insertion phases of colonoscopy, also subgrouping polyps for size and location, were compared.
RESULTS: Thirty-two (74%) advanced adenomas and 21 (95%) cancers were detected during the insertion, being only 11 (26%) and one (5%) identified during withdrawal, respectively. This was mainly due to a higher detection of >10 mm polyps during insertion than during withdrawal (75% versus 25%).
CONCLUSIONS: Most advanced neoplasia are detected during the insertion. Although withdrawal time has been shown to be important, the scope insertion phase related to polyp detection should be specifically addressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19194715     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-009-0633-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  22 in total

1.  Method of colonoscopy in 42 consecutive patients presenting after prior incomplete colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Brody W Goodwine
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Colon cancer prevention in Italy: cost-effectiveness analysis with CT colonography and endoscopy.

Authors:  C Hassan; A Zullo; A Laghi; I Reitano; F Taggi; P Cerro; F Iafrate; M Giustini; S Winn; S Morini
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.088

Review 3.  Pathology of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M Ponz de Leon; C Di Gregorio
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.088

Review 4.  Q&A on diagnosis, screening and follow-up of colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  C Hassan; A Laghi; A Zullo; F Iafrate; S Morini
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 4.088

5.  Cancer incidence and mortality in Europe, 2004.

Authors:  P Boyle; J Ferlay
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 6.  The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening.

Authors:  Sidney J Winawer; Ann G Zauber
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2002-01

7.  Position changes improve visibility during colonoscope withdrawal: a randomized, blinded, crossover trial.

Authors:  James E East; Noriko Suzuki; Naila Arebi; Paul Bassett; Brian P Saunders
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Natural history of untreated colonic polyps.

Authors:  S J Stryker; B G Wolff; C E Culp; S D Libbe; D M Ilstrup; R L MacCarty
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Thomas F Imperiale; Danielle R Latinovich; L Lisa Bratcher
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M N Ho; M J O'Brien; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; M Schapiro; J H Bond; J F Panish
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  12 in total

1.  Endoscopic management of failed colonoscopy in clinical practice: to change endoscopist, instrument, or both?

Authors:  Sergio Morini; Angelo Zullo; Cesare Hassan; Roberto Lorenzetti; Salvatore M A Campo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Quality and safety of screening colonoscopies performed by primary care physicians with standby specialist support.

Authors:  Sudha Xirasagar; Thomas G Hurley; Lekhena Sros; James R Hebert
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Endoscopy: insertion versus withdrawal phases for polyp detection.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 46.802

4.  Image-enhanced endoscopy for diagnosis of colorectal tumors in view of endoscopic treatment.

Authors:  Naohisa Yoshida; Nobuaki Yagi; Akio Yanagisawa; Yuji Naito
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-12-16

5.  Next-generation narrow band imaging system for colonic polyp detection: a prospective multicenter randomized trial.

Authors:  Takahiro Horimatsu; Yasushi Sano; Shinji Tanaka; Takuji Kawamura; Shoichi Saito; Mineo Iwatate; Shiro Oka; Koji Uno; Kenichi Yoshimura; Hideki Ishikawa; Manabu Muto; Hisao Tajiri
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Retrospective analysis showing the water method increased adenoma detection rate - a hypothesis generating observation.

Authors:  Joseph W Leung; Lynne D Do; Rodelei M Siao-Salera; Catherine Ngo; Dhavan A Parikh; Surinder K Mann; Felix W Leung
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01

7.  The water method significantly enhances proximal diminutive adenoma detection rate in unsedated patients.

Authors:  Felix W Leung; Joseph W Leung; Rodelei M Siao-Salera; Surinder K Mann
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-01

8.  Clinical significance of colorectal polyp detection on colonoscopy insertion.

Authors:  Taku Sakamoto; Raji Ramaraj; Yutaka Tomizawa; Hourin Cho; Takahisa Matsuda; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 4.623

9.  Adenoma detection at colonoscopy by polypectomy in withdrawal only versus both insertion and withdrawal: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Madhusudhan R Sanaka; Mansour A Parsi; Carol A Burke; David Barnes; James Church; Maged Rizk; Nizar Zein; Rajesh Joseph; Prashanthi N Thota; Rocio Lopez; Ravi P Kiran
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Narrow-band imaging does not improve detection of colorectal polyps when compared to conventional colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis of published studies.

Authors:  Luis C Sabbagh; Ludovic Reveiz; Diego Aponte; Sylvia de Aguiar
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.