Literature DB >> 19192828

A Bayesian approach to analyzing ecotoxicological data.

Elise Billoir1, Marie Laure Delignette-Muller, Alexandre R R Péry, Sandrine Charles.   

Abstract

Standardized chronic toxicity tests are usually analyzed using a NOEC (no observed effect concentration) or ECx (x% effect concentration) calculation. However,these methods provide very little information for the material cost they entail. It has been proposed that biology-based methods, such as the DEBtox approach, would make better use of the data available. DEBtox deals with the energy balance between physiological processes, and gives insight on how a compound disturbs it. We propose that data analysis can be further improved by estimating the DEBtox parameters using the considerable expertise available in laboratories and/or the literature. The Bayesian inference appears to be an appropriate estimation method for this purpose, as this technique takes expertise into account as prior probability distribution for each parameter, and provides the corresponding posterior distributions given the data. From these posterior distributions, point estimates can easily be deduced, but also credible intervals which are ideal for use in risk assessment. In this paper, we demonstrate this approach through the analysis of two 21-day Daphnia reproduction tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19192828     DOI: 10.1021/es801418x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  4 in total

1.  Survival data analyses in ecotoxicology: critical effect concentrations, methods and models. What should we use?

Authors:  Carole Forfait-Dubuc; Sandrine Charles; Elise Billoir; Marie Laure Delignette-Muller
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Consequences of a multi-generation exposure to uranium on Caenorhabditis elegans life parameters and sensitivity.

Authors:  Benoit Goussen; Florian Parisot; Rémy Beaudouin; Morgan Dutilleul; Adeline Buisset-Goussen; Alexandre R R Péry; Jean-Marc Bonzom
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  In Silico Methods for Environmental Risk Assessment: Principles, Tiered Approaches, Applications, and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Astuto; Matteo R Di Nicola; José V Tarazona; A Rortais; Yann Devos; A K Djien Liem; George E N Kass; Maria Bastaki; Reinhilde Schoonjans; Angelo Maggiore; Sandrine Charles; Aude Ratier; Christelle Lopes; Ophelia Gestin; Tobin Robinson; Antony Williams; Nynke Kramer; Edoardo Carnesecchi; Jean-Lou C M Dorne
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

4.  Consensus versus Individual QSARs in Classification: Comparison on a Large-Scale Case Study.

Authors:  Cecile Valsecchi; Francesca Grisoni; Viviana Consonni; Davide Ballabio
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.956

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.