BACKGROUND: Few patients who attend GP consultations frequently continue to do so long term. While transient frequent attendance may be readily explicable, persistent frequent attendance often is not. It increases GPs' workload while reducing work satisfaction. It is neither reasonable, nor efficient to target diagnostic assessment and intervention at transient frequent attenders. AIM: To develop a prediction rule for selecting persistent frequent attenders, using readily available information from GPs' electronic medical records. DESIGN OF STUDY: A historic 3-year cohort study. METHOD: Data of 28 860 adult patients from 2003 to 2005 were examined. Frequent attenders were patients whose attendance rate ranked in the (age- and sex-adjusted) top 10% during 1 year (1-year frequent attenders) or 3 years (persistent frequent attenders). Bootstrapped multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine which predictors contained information on persistent frequent attendance. RESULTS: Of 3045 1-year frequent attenders, 470 (15.4%) became persistent frequent attenders. The prediction rule could update this prior probability to 3.3% (lowest value) or 43.3% (highest value). However, the 10th and 90th centiles of the posterior probability distribution were 7.4% and 26.3% respectively, indicating that the model performs modestly. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.67 (95% confidence limits 0.64 and 0.69). CONCLUSION: Among 1-year frequent attenders, six out of seven are transient frequent attenders. With the present indicators, the rule developed performs modestly in selecting those more likely to become persistent frequent attenders.
BACKGROUND: Few patients who attend GP consultations frequently continue to do so long term. While transient frequent attendance may be readily explicable, persistent frequent attendance often is not. It increases GPs' workload while reducing work satisfaction. It is neither reasonable, nor efficient to target diagnostic assessment and intervention at transient frequent attenders. AIM: To develop a prediction rule for selecting persistent frequent attenders, using readily available information from GPs' electronic medical records. DESIGN OF STUDY: A historic 3-year cohort study. METHOD: Data of 28 860 adult patients from 2003 to 2005 were examined. Frequent attenders were patients whose attendance rate ranked in the (age- and sex-adjusted) top 10% during 1 year (1-year frequent attenders) or 3 years (persistent frequent attenders). Bootstrapped multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine which predictors contained information on persistent frequent attendance. RESULTS: Of 3045 1-year frequent attenders, 470 (15.4%) became persistent frequent attenders. The prediction rule could update this prior probability to 3.3% (lowest value) or 43.3% (highest value). However, the 10th and 90th centiles of the posterior probability distribution were 7.4% and 26.3% respectively, indicating that the model performs modestly. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.67 (95% confidence limits 0.64 and 0.69). CONCLUSION: Among 1-year frequent attenders, six out of seven are transient frequent attenders. With the present indicators, the rule developed performs modestly in selecting those more likely to become persistent frequent attenders.
Authors: P Little; J Somerville; I Williamson; G Warner; M Moore; R Wiles; S George; A Smith; R Peveler Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Bettine Schreuders; Harm van Marwijk; Jan Smit; Frank Rijmen; Wim Stalman; Patricia van Oppen Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Shireen Patel; Joe Kai; Christopher Atha; Anthony Avery; Boliang Guo; Marilyn James; Samuel Malins; Christopher Sampson; Michelle Stubley; Richard Morriss Journal: Fam Pract Date: 2015-10-08 Impact factor: 2.267
Authors: Samuel Malins; Joe Kai; Christopher Atha; Anthony Avery; Boliang Guo; Marilyn James; Shireen Patel; Christopher Sampson; Michelle Stubley; Richard Morriss Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2016-07-18 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Benjamin A Goldstein; Ann Marie Navar; Michael J Pencina; John P A Ioannidis Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Richard Morriss; Joe Kai; Christopher Atha; Anthony Avery; Sara Bayes; Matthew Franklin; Tracey George; Marilyn James; Samuel Malins; Ruth McDonald; Shireen Patel; Michelle Stubley; Min Yang Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2012-07-06 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Frans T Smits; Henk J Brouwer; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Marjan van den Akker; Ben van Steenkiste; Jacob Mohrs; Aart H Schene; Henk C van Weert; Gerben Ter Riet Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-09-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Frans T Smits; Henk J Brouwer; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Jacob Mohrs; Hugo M Smeets; Judith E Bosmans; Aart H Schene; Henk C Van Weert; Gerben ter Riet Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 2.497