BACKGROUND: The prevalence of patients with mental health problems in general practice is high, and at least one-third of these problems last for 6 months or longer. Patients with these problems take up more time during a consultation and attend more frequently. AIM: This study investigated the effectiveness of problem-solving treatment for primary care patients with mental health problems. The hypothesis was that patients receiving problem-solving treatment from a nurse would have fewer symptoms after 3 months, or a lower attendance rate, compared with patients receiving the usual care from the GP. DESIGN OF THE STUDY: Randomised clinical trial. SETTING:Twelve general practices in Amsterdam and 12 nurses from a mental healthcare institution. METHOD: A sample of patients aged >or=18 years were screened for mental health problems with the general health questionnaire (GHQ-12) in the waiting room of the general practices, and were randomised. Patients receiving the problem-solving treatment were required to complete four to six treatment sessions, while patients in the control group were treated as usual by the GP. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of improved psychopathology or a decrease in attendance rate. Post-hoc analyses showed a sub-group of patients with more severe pathology who may benefit from problem-solving treatment. CONCLUSION: The main results show that problem-solving treatment provided by a nurse adds little to the usual care from the GP for frequent attenders with mental health problems. Post-hoc analyses show that there may be a sub-group of more severely depressed patients who could benefit from problem-solving treatment.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of patients with mental health problems in general practice is high, and at least one-third of these problems last for 6 months or longer. Patients with these problems take up more time during a consultation and attend more frequently. AIM: This study investigated the effectiveness of problem-solving treatment for primary care patients with mental health problems. The hypothesis was that patients receiving problem-solving treatment from a nurse would have fewer symptoms after 3 months, or a lower attendance rate, compared with patients receiving the usual care from the GP. DESIGN OF THE STUDY: Randomised clinical trial. SETTING: Twelve general practices in Amsterdam and 12 nurses from a mental healthcare institution. METHOD: A sample of patients aged >or=18 years were screened for mental health problems with the general health questionnaire (GHQ-12) in the waiting room of the general practices, and were randomised. Patients receiving the problem-solving treatment were required to complete four to six treatment sessions, while patients in the control group were treated as usual by the GP. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of improved psychopathology or a decrease in attendance rate. Post-hoc analyses showed a sub-group of patients with more severe pathology who may benefit from problem-solving treatment. CONCLUSION: The main results show that problem-solving treatment provided by a nurse adds little to the usual care from the GP for frequent attenders with mental health problems. Post-hoc analyses show that there may be a sub-group of more severely depressedpatients who could benefit from problem-solving treatment.
Authors: Jan Spijker; Ron de Graaf; Rob V Bijl; Aartjan T F Beekman; Johan Ormel; Willem A Nolen Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Digna J F van Schaik; Alexandra F J Klijn; Hein P J van Hout; Harm W J van Marwijk; Aartjan T F Beekman; Marten de Haan; Richard van Dyck Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2004 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Elizabeth H B Lin; Wayne Katon; Michael Von Korff; Lingqi Tang; John W Williams; Kurt Kroenke; Enid Hunkeler; Linda Harpole; Mark Hegel; Patricia Arean; Marc Hoffing; Richard Della Penna; Chris Langston; Jürgen Unützer Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-11-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Spyros Kolovos; Judith E Bosmans; Johanna M van Dongen; Birre van Esveld; Dorcas Magai; Annemieke van Straten; Christina van der Feltz-Cornelis; Kirsten M van Steenbergen-Weijenburg; Klaas M Huijbregts; Harm van Marwijk; Heleen Riper; Maurits W van Tulder Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2017-03-04 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Frans ThM Smits; Henk J Brouwer; Henk C P van Weert; Aart H Schene; Gerben ter Riet Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Andrea C Tricco; Jesmin Antony; Noah M Ivers; Huda M Ashoor; Paul A Khan; Erik Blondal; Marco Ghassemi; Heather MacDonald; Maggie H Chen; Lianne Kark Ezer; Sharon E Straus Journal: CMAJ Date: 2014-09-15 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Judith E Bosmans; Bettine Schreuders; Harm W J van Marwijk; Jan H Smit; Patricia van Oppen; Maurits W van Tulder Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2012-10-10 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Annemarie M J Braamse; Berno van Meijel; Otto Visser; Patricia van Oppen; Annette D Boenink; Corien Eeltink; Pim Cuijpers; Peter C Huijgens; Aartjan T F Beekman; Joost Dekker Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2010-07-07 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Trijntje Y G van der Voort; Berno van Meijel; Peter J J Goossens; Janwillem Renes; Aartjan T F Beekman; Ralph W Kupka Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2011-08-17 Impact factor: 3.630