Literature DB >> 19190968

Implementation of a critical pathway for distal pancreatectomy at an academic institution.

Eugene P Kennedy1, Tyler R Grenda, Patricia K Sauter, Ernest L Rosato, Karen A Chojnacki, Francis E Rosato, Bernadette C Profeta, Cataldo Doria, Adam C Berger, Charles J Yeo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to identify quantifiable parameters to track performance improvements brought about by the implementation of a critical pathway for complex alimentary tract surgery.
BACKGROUND: Distal pancreatectomy is among the more complex general surgical procedures. This is primarily due to the possibility of blood loss from visceral vessels, splenic injury, and significant postoperative complications. The introduction of the laparoscopic approach to the distal pancreas has introduced a further level of surgical expertise required to fully address the clinical needs of this diverse patient population. Critical pathways have been one of the key tools used to achieve consistently excellent outcomes at high-quality, high-volume institutions. It remains to be determined if implementation of a critical pathway at an academic institution with prior moderate experience with distal pancreatectomy will result in performance gains and improved outcomes.
METHODS: Between January 1, 2003 and August 15, 2007, 111 patients underwent distal pancreatectomy. Forty patients underwent resection during the 34-month period before the implementation of a critical pathway on October 15, 2005 and 71 during the 20 months after pathway implementation. Patients undergoing both open and laparoscopic procedures were included. Peri- and postoperative parameters were analyzed retrospectively to identify those that could be used to track performance improvement and outcomes.
RESULTS: The two groups were not significantly different with respect to age, sex, race, diagnosis, operative blood loss, or mean operative duration. Postoperative length of hospital stay was significantly shorter when comparing pre- to postpathway implementation (10.2 days versus 6.7 days, P < or = 0.037). The rate of readmission to the hospital after discharge was significantly lower post pathway (25% versus 7%, P < or = 0.027). Hospital costs were also reduced.
CONCLUSION: Implementation of a critical pathway for a complex procedure can be demonstrated to improve short-term outcomes at an academic institution. This improvement can be quantified and tracked and has implications for better utilization of resources and overall cost containment while maintaining or improving upon an already high level of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19190968     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-009-0803-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  20 in total

1.  Are critical pathways effective for reducing postoperative length of stay?

Authors:  Sydney Morss Dy; Pushkal P Garg; Dorothy Nyberg; Patricia B Dawson; Peter J Pronovost; Laura Morlock; Haya R Rubin; Marie Diener-West; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Critical pathway effectiveness: assessing the impact of patient, hospital care, and pathway characteristics using qualitative comparative analysis.

Authors:  Sydney M Dy; Pushkal Garg; Dorothy Nyberg; Patricia B Dawson; Peter J Pronovost; Laura Morlock; Haya Rubin; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Initiation of a critical pathway for pancreaticoduodenectomy at an academic institution--the first step in multidisciplinary team building.

Authors:  Eugene P Kennedy; Ernest L Rosato; Patricia K Sauter; Laura M Rosenberg; Cataldo Doria; Ignazio R Marino; Karen A Chojnacki; Adam C Berger; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 4.  Integrated care pathways.

Authors:  H Campbell; R Hotchkiss; N Bradshaw; M Porteous
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-01-10

5.  Impact of a clinical pathway for elective infrarenal aortic reconstructions.

Authors:  T S Huber; L M Carlton; T R Harward; M M Russin; P T Phillips; B J Nalli; T C Flynn; J M Seeger
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; S Kaushal; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; H A Pitt; C J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Implementation of a clinical pathway decreases length of stay and cost for bowel resection.

Authors:  T A Pritts; M S Nussbaum; L V Flesch; E J Fegelman; A A Parikh; J E Fischer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  The effect of clinical pathway implementation on total hospital costs for thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy patients.

Authors:  D W Markey; J McGowan; J B Hanks
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  Cost and utilization impact of a clinical pathway for patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  G A Porter; P W Pisters; C Mansyur; A Bisanz; K Reyna; P Stanford; J E Lee; D B Evans
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Indwelling urinary catheter use in the postoperative period: analysis of the national surgical infection prevention project data.

Authors:  Heidi L Wald; Allen Ma; Dale W Bratzler; Andrew M Kramer
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2008-06
View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Fast-track programmes for hepatopancreatic resections: where do we stand?

Authors:  Lidewij Spelt; Daniel Ansari; Christian Sturesson; Bobby Tingstedt; Roland Andersson
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Academic Pancreas Centers of Excellence: Guidance from a multidisciplinary chronic pancreatitis working group at PancreasFest.

Authors:  Sunil G Sheth; Darwin L Conwell; David C Whitcomb; Matthew Alsante; Michelle A Anderson; Jamie Barkin; Randall Brand; Gregory A Cote; Steven D Freedman; Andres Gelrud; Fred Gorelick; Linda S Lee; Katherine Morgan; Stephen Pandol; Vikesh K Singh; Dhiraj Yadav; C Mel Wilcox; Phil A Hart
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 3.  Fast-track surgery: procedure-specific aspects and future direction.

Authors:  Daniel Ansari; Luca Gianotti; Jörg Schröder; Roland Andersson
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations.

Authors:  Kristoffer Lassen; Marielle M E Coolsen; Karem Slim; Francesco Carli; José E de Aguilar-Nascimento; Markus Schäfer; Rowan W Parks; Kenneth C H Fearon; Dileep N Lobo; Nicolas Demartines; Marco Braga; Olle Ljungqvist; Cornelis H C Dejong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery with particular emphasis on pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Authors:  M M E Coolsen; R M van Dam; A A van der Wilt; K Slim; K Lassen; C H C Dejong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Can pancreaticoduodenectomy performed at a comprehensive community cancer center have comparable results as major tertiary center?

Authors:  Charles Cheng; David Duppler; Boguslawa Koczon Jaremko
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2011-09

Review 7.  Enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Daniel J Kagedan; Mahrosh Ahmed; Katharine S Devitt; Alice C Wei
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Adherence to ERAS elements in major visceral surgery-an observational pilot study.

Authors:  Steffen Wolk; Marius Distler; Benjamin Müssle; Susanne Söthje; Jürgen Weitz; Thilo Welsch
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 9.  Enhanced recovery pathways in pancreatic surgery: State of the art.

Authors:  Nicolò Pecorelli; Sara Nobile; Stefano Partelli; Luca Cardinali; Stefano Crippa; Gianpaolo Balzano; Luigi Beretta; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Multi-institutional practice patterns and outcomes in uncomplicated gastroschisis: a report from the University of California Fetal Consortium (UCfC).

Authors:  Leslie A Lusk; Erin G Brown; Rachael T Overcash; Tristan R Grogan; Roberta L Keller; Jae H Kim; Francis R Poulain; Steve B Shew; Cherry Uy; Daniel A DeUgarte
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.545

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.