AIMS: Impulsivity is common in bipolar disorder, especially during mania. Understanding the functional neuroanatomy of response inhibition, one component of impulsivity, might clarify the neural substrate of bipolar disorder. METHODS: Sixteen DSM-IV first-episode, manic bipolar patients and 16 matched healthy subjects were examined during a first manic episode using functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing a response inhibition task. All subjects were studied using a 4.0 Tesla Varian Unity INOVA Whole Body MRI/MRS system. The response inhibition task was presented using non-ferromagnetic goggles, and task performance was recorded during scan acquisition. Imaging data were analysed using analysis of functional neuroimages. Group contrasts were made for the specific response inhibition measure. RESULTS: The groups performed the task similarly, although both demonstrated relatively poor rates of target response, but high rates of successful 'stops'. Despite similar behavioural results, the groups showed significantly different patterns of functional magnetic resonance imaging brain activation. Specifically, during response inhibition, the healthy subjects exhibited significantly greater activation in anterior and posterior cingulate, medial dorsal thalamus, middle temporal gyrus, and precuneus. The bipolar patients exhibited prefrontal activation (BA 10) that was not observed in healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar and healthy subjects exhibit different patterns of brain activation to response inhibition; these differences may reflect different functional neuroanatomic approaches to response inhibition between the two groups.
AIMS: Impulsivity is common in bipolar disorder, especially during mania. Understanding the functional neuroanatomy of response inhibition, one component of impulsivity, might clarify the neural substrate of bipolar disorder. METHODS: Sixteen DSM-IV first-episode, manic bipolarpatients and 16 matched healthy subjects were examined during a first manic episode using functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing a response inhibition task. All subjects were studied using a 4.0 Tesla Varian Unity INOVA Whole Body MRI/MRS system. The response inhibition task was presented using non-ferromagnetic goggles, and task performance was recorded during scan acquisition. Imaging data were analysed using analysis of functional neuroimages. Group contrasts were made for the specific response inhibition measure. RESULTS: The groups performed the task similarly, although both demonstrated relatively poor rates of target response, but high rates of successful 'stops'. Despite similar behavioural results, the groups showed significantly different patterns of functional magnetic resonance imaging brain activation. Specifically, during response inhibition, the healthy subjects exhibited significantly greater activation in anterior and posterior cingulate, medial dorsal thalamus, middle temporal gyrus, and precuneus. The bipolarpatients exhibited prefrontal activation (BA 10) that was not observed in healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS:Bipolar and healthy subjects exhibit different patterns of brain activation to response inhibition; these differences may reflect different functional neuroanatomic approaches to response inhibition between the two groups.
Authors: Stephen M Strakowski; Melissa P DelBello; David E Fleck; Caleb M Adler; Robert M Anthenelli; Paul E Keck; Lesley M Arnold; Jennifer Amicone Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2005-08
Authors: Stephen M Strakowski; Caleb M Adler; Scott K Holland; Neil Mills; Melissa P DelBello Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Caleb M Adler; Scott K Holland; Vince Schmithorst; Michael J Tuchfarber; Stephen M Strakowski Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: R D Rogers; A M Owen; H C Middleton; E J Williams; J D Pickard; B J Sahakian; T W Robbins Journal: J Neurosci Date: 1999-10-15 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Michael A Cerullo; Caleb M Adler; Martine Lamy; James C Eliassen; David E Fleck; Stephen M Strakowski; Melissa P DelBello Journal: Early Interv Psychiatry Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 2.732
Authors: Tom A Hummer; Leslie A Hulvershorn; Harish S Karne; Abigail D Gunn; Yang Wang; Amit Anand Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2012-08-04 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Stephen M Strakowski; James C Eliassen; Martine Lamy; Michael A Cerullo; Jane B Allendorfer; Michelle Madore; Jing-Huei Lee; Jeffrey A Welge; Melissa P DelBello; David E Fleck; Caleb M Adler Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2010-11-03 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Stephen M Strakowski; David E Fleck; Jeffrey Welge; James C Eliassen; Matthew Norris; Michelle Durling; Richard A Komoroski; Wen-Jang Chu; Wade Weber; Jonathan A Dudley; Thomas J Blom; Amanda Stover; Christina Klein; Jeffrey R Strawn; Melissa P DelBello; Jing-Huei Lee; Caleb M Adler Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2016-09-19 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Judah Weathers; Melissa A Brotman; Christen M Deveney; Pilyoung Kim; Carlos Zarate; Stephen Fromm; Daniel Pine; Ellen Leibenluft Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2013-08-17 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Samantha M Bitter; Neil P Mills; Caleb M Adler; Stephen M Strakowski; Melissa P DelBello Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2011-08-10 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Lara C Foland-Ross; Susan Y Bookheimer; Matthew D Lieberman; Catherine A Sugar; Jennifer D Townsend; Jeffrey Fischer; Salvatore Torrisi; Conor Penfold; Sarah K Madsen; Paul M Thompson; Lori L Altshuler Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-08-10 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Kristen R Hamilton; Andrew K Littlefield; Noelle C Anastasio; Kathryn A Cunningham; Latham H L Fink; Victoria C Wing; Charles W Mathias; Scott D Lane; Christian G Schütz; Alan C Swann; C W Lejuez; Luke Clark; F Gerard Moeller; Marc N Potenza Journal: Personal Disord Date: 2015-04
Authors: Martin J Lan; Binod Thapa Chhetry; Maria A Oquendo; M Elizabeth Sublette; Gregory Sullivan; J John Mann; Ramin V Parsey Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 6.744