OBJECTIVES: Bipolar disorder (BD) is a psychiatric disorder with high morbidity and mortality that cannot be distinguished from major depressive disorder (MDD) until the first manic episode. A biomarker able to differentiate BD and MDD could help clinicians avoid risks of treating BD with antidepressants without mood stabilizers. METHODS: Cortical thickness differences were assessed using magnetic resonance imaging in BD depressed patients (n = 18), MDD depressed patients (n = 56), and healthy volunteers (HVs) (n = 54). A general linear model identified clusters of cortical thickness difference between diagnostic groups. RESULTS: Compared to the HV group, the BD group had decreased cortical thickness in six regions, after controlling for age and sex, located within the frontal and parietal lobes, and the posterior cingulate cortex. Mean cortical thickness changes in clusters ranged from 7.6 to 9.6% (cluster-wise p-values from 1.0 e-4 to 0.037). When compared to MDD, three clusters of lower cortical thickness in BD were identified that overlapped with clusters that differentiated the BD and HV groups. Mean cortical thickness changes in the clusters ranged from 7.5 to 8.2% (cluster-wise p-values from 1.0 e-4 to 0.023). The difference in cortical thickness was more pronounced when the subgroup of subjects with bipolar I disorder (BD-I) was compared to the MDD group. CONCLUSIONS: Cortical thickness patterns were distinct between BD and MDD. These results are a step toward developing an imaging test to differentiate the two disorders.
OBJECTIVES:Bipolar disorder (BD) is a psychiatric disorder with high morbidity and mortality that cannot be distinguished from major depressive disorder (MDD) until the first manic episode. A biomarker able to differentiate BD and MDD could help clinicians avoid risks of treating BD with antidepressants without mood stabilizers. METHODS: Cortical thickness differences were assessed using magnetic resonance imaging in BD depressedpatients (n = 18), MDD depressedpatients (n = 56), and healthy volunteers (HVs) (n = 54). A general linear model identified clusters of cortical thickness difference between diagnostic groups. RESULTS: Compared to the HV group, the BD group had decreased cortical thickness in six regions, after controlling for age and sex, located within the frontal and parietal lobes, and the posterior cingulate cortex. Mean cortical thickness changes in clusters ranged from 7.6 to 9.6% (cluster-wise p-values from 1.0 e-4 to 0.037). When compared to MDD, three clusters of lower cortical thickness in BD were identified that overlapped with clusters that differentiated the BD and HV groups. Mean cortical thickness changes in the clusters ranged from 7.5 to 8.2% (cluster-wise p-values from 1.0 e-4 to 0.023). The difference in cortical thickness was more pronounced when the subgroup of subjects with bipolar I disorder (BD-I) was compared to the MDD group. CONCLUSIONS: Cortical thickness patterns were distinct between BD and MDD. These results are a step toward developing an imaging test to differentiate the two disorders.
Authors: Nathalie Vizueta; Jeffrey D Rudie; Jennifer D Townsend; Salvatore Torrisi; Teena D Moody; Susan Y Bookheimer; Lori L Altshuler Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: C B Hartberg; K Sundet; L M Rimol; U K Haukvik; E H Lange; R Nesvåg; A M Dale; I Melle; O A Andreassen; I Agartz Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Fabiano G Nery; Koji Matsuo; Mark A Nicoletti; E Serap Monkul; Giovana B Zunta-Soares; John P Hatch; Beny Lafer; Jair C Soares Journal: Neurosci Lett Date: 2011-08-22 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Catherine B Fortier; Elizabeth C Leritz; David H Salat; Jonathan R Venne; Arkadiy L Maksimovskiy; Victoria Williams; William P Milberg; Regina E McGlinchey Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2011-09-15 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Sudhakar Selvaraj; Danilo Arnone; Dominic Job; Andrew Stanfield; Tom Fd Farrow; Allison C Nugent; Harald Scherk; Oliver Gruber; Xiaohua Chen; Perminder S Sachdev; Daniel P Dickstein; Gin S Malhi; Tae H Ha; Kyooseob Ha; Mary L Phillips; Andrew M McIntosh Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Benjamin C Mullin; Susan B Perlman; Amelia Versace; Jorge R C de Almeida; Edmund J Labarbara; Crystal Klein; Cecile D Ladouceur; Mary L Phillips Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2012-04-16 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Ayal Schaffer; Erkki T Isometsä; Leonardo Tondo; Doris H Moreno; Mark Sinyor; Lars Vedel Kessing; Gustavo Turecki; Abraham Weizman; Jean-Michel Azorin; Kyooseob Ha; Catherine Reis; Frederick Cassidy; Tina Goldstein; Zoltán Rihmer; Annette Beautrais; Yuan-Hwa Chou; Nancy Diazgranados; Anthony J Levitt; Carlos A Zarate; Lakshmi Yatham Journal: Aust N Z J Psychiatry Date: 2015-07-16 Impact factor: 5.744
Authors: Wenjing Zhang; Yuan Xiao; Huaiqiang Sun; L Rodrigo Patino; Maxwell J Tallman; Wade A Weber; Caleb M Adler; Christina Klein; Jeffrey R Strawn; Fabiano G Nery; Qiyong Gong; John A Sweeney; Su Lui; Melissa P DelBello Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Annabel Vreeker; Lucija Abramovic; Marco P M Boks; Sanne Verkooijen; Annet H van Bergen; Roel A Ophoff; René S Kahn; Neeltje E M van Haren Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2017-07-06 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Harry Rubin-Falcone; Francesca Zanderigo; Binod Thapa-Chhetry; Martin Lan; Jeffrey M Miller; M Elizabeth Sublette; Maria A Oquendo; David J Hellerstein; Patrick J McGrath; Johnathan W Stewart; J John Mann Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Germaine Fung; Yi Deng; Qing Zhao; Zhi Li; Miao Qu; Ke Li; Ya-Wei Zeng; Zhen Jin; Yan-Tao Ma; Xin Yu; Zhi-Ren Wang; David H K Shum; Raymond C K Chan Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2015-11-21 Impact factor: 3.630